week 9 Flashcards

1
Q

is emotion inborn?

A

Trait emotionality is moderately heritable (40-60%) (Bouchard & Loehlin, 2001).
Genetic variants associated with trait emotionality have small effect sizes (Sen et al., 2004).
Brain metabolic measures related to emotionality show no heritability (Glahn et al., 2007).
Specific genetic variants are linked to reward and threat processing in the brain (Nikolova et al., 2016).
Associations between genetics and emotionality may result from gene-environment interactions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the limbic system

A

identified by early emotion scientists for emotion.
Collection of subcortical structures beneath cerebral cortex and above brain stem.
Components include thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, basal ganglia.
Cortical structures like cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex may be part of the limbic system.
Disagreement exists on the exact components of the limbic structure (Gazzaniga et al.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the amygdala

A

-linked to emotions; injuries lead to reduced emotional responses.
Human studies confirm
- key role in fear conditioning.
-Amygdala functions in fear circuits: detects threat unconsciously, regulates responses, and signals cognitive systems for conscious fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the low and high roads to fear

A

LeDoux (1996) identifies two pathways to the amygdala: “quick and dirty” low road, and “slow but accurate” high road.
The low road bypasses cortical processing, activating the amygdala in 12 ms.
Dual process allows rapid, unconscious reactions before conscious fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the amygdala and HPA axis

A

detects threat, activating HPA axis.
Indirectly stimulates hypothalamus to release CRF.
CRF prompts pituitary to release ACTH into bloodstream.
ACTH triggers adrenal gland to produce cortisol.
Elevated blood cortisol levels respond to threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the survival circuits

A

LeDoux (2012): Renames amygdala circuits as “survival circuits.”
Acknowledges amygdala’s role in physiological threat responses, deeming it less crucial for subjective feelings.
Evidence: Amygdala stimulation elicits physiological, not subjective, responses.
Amygdala lesion patients can consciously report emotional experiences, including fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the amygdala and mental disorders

A

Anxiety disorders linked to heightened amygdala reactivity (Janak & Tye, 2015).
Applies to panic disorder, social phobias, PTSD, and GAD.
Increased amygdala activity triggers hormone elevation.
Anxious individuals need more PFC activity to suppress unpleasant emotions.
Similar amygdala hyperreactivity and reduced PFC activity seen in depressive disorders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what about pleasure and reward

A

Brain’s reward system has three components: Liking, Wanting, Learning.
Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system, VTA, NAc, and OFC, is the primary reward circuit (Wanting).
crucial for the brain’s reward processes (Berridge & Kringelbach, 2015).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the role of amygdala in reward processing

A

Amygdala lesions impair reward-based behavior, affecting responses to changing cues (Janak & Tye, 2015).
encodes stimulus valence, with neurons responding to fear, reward, or both, proportionate to ANS activation (Sangha et al., 2013).
Orbitofrontal cortex tightly linked to amygdala, integrates inner and outer worlds (Adolphs, 2002).
Recent studies show orbitofrontal cortex represents reward value; lesions impair decision making when rewards cease (Rolls et al., 2020).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

brain network perspective on emotion

A

Recent neuroscientific evidence favors a network perspective over a modular view of brain function.
Pessoa (2014) highlights pluripotency and degeneracy—regions participate in many functions and vice versa.
Brain processes are distributed and parallel, not sequential and hierarchical (Goldman-Rakic, 1988).
Extensive connectivity exists between cortical areas, subcortical-cortical areas, and subcortical regions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

features of brain networks

A

overlapping regions, with specific areas belonging to multiple networks.
Processes in a brain region aren’t fixed to a particular mental function.
McIntosh (2000) suggests a region’s network affiliation is dynamically determined by interactions at a given time, known as neural context.
Example: Cue indicating reward possibility increases cortical-subcortical functional connections (Kinnison et al., 2012).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

emotion-related brain network features

A

Neuroimaging data shows emotion-associated neural systems spanning cortical and subcortical regions (Kragel & LaBar, 2016).
Emotional processing increases overall functional connections.
In the cortex, reward enhances connectivity, while threat decreases it (Pessoa & McMenamin, 2017).
Stronger signal correlations in the salience network link to stronger negative affect (Hermans et al., 2011).
Intensively studied networks: Salience (attention orientation), Executive control (goal-oriented), Default (task-negative, associated with memory and internal thought).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

changes in network organisation over time

A

Study (McMenamin et al., 2014): Participants anticipated threat or safety for 60 seconds.
Threat initially increased salience network communication, reduced executive control network facilitation.
Intermediate period: Threat decreased salience network efficiency, increased amygdala involvement in inter-network communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evidence of cultural effects on emotion

A

Boiger (2013) cross-cultural study on anger and shame appraisals, action tendencies, and intensity.
Japanese anger type (55%): Nodding, smiling, rumination; American type (43%): Blaming, direct expression.
Uchida et al. (2009): Japanese emotions between people, American emotions within people.
Olympic athlete interviews: Japanese use more emotion words; Japanese infer more emotion in team context, Americans in solitary.
Chentsova-Dutton and Tsai (2010): Priming with individual or family self influences emotion intensity.
European Americans link emotions to individual self; Asian Americans link emotions to family and relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

differences in neurobiological substrates

A

fMRI study (Immordino-Yang et al., 2014): Chinese linked feeling strength to ventral anterior insula, European Americans to dorsal anterior insula.
Bicultural East-Asian Americans showed an intermediate pattern with equal ventral and dorsal anterior insula activation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

emotions as relationship engagements

A

Emotions primarily happen in social contexts and relationships.
Nonsocial emotions are less common and brief.
Boiger & Mesquita (2012): Emotions are socially constructed, influenced by interactions, relationships, and sociocultural contexts.

17
Q

the cultural logic to emotion

A

De Leersnyder et al. (2021): Cultural logic to emotion.
Emotions reflect self-definition and social relationships.
Valued emotions vary across cultures.
Culturally encouraged emotions align with achieving self and relationship goals, leading to more frequent and intense experiences.

18
Q

reading

A

1980s: Emotion crucial in human behavior studies.
Emotion holds “privileged status” in the brain, influenced by psychological mechanisms.
Conceptual precision challenging; diverse definitions reflect different theories.
Major theories: James-Lange, Cannon-Bard, Schachter’s two-factor.
Basic emotions propose adaptive responses; criticisms exist.
Feldman-Barrett advocates dimensional approach, challenges emotional categories.
Russell’s circumplex model represents emotions based on valence and arousal.
Appraisal theories focus on cognitive processing; criticisms include excessive cognitivism.
Conclusion: Progress in understanding emotions, emphasizing role of emotional modeling in contemporary studies.