06- speech sound development norms Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

word initial

A

VOT and formant transitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

word final

A

stop gap & voicebar & formant transitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

/r/ primary acoustic cue

A

low F3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cross-sectional large-scale normative studies

A

track different kids at each age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

age of acquisition

A

not the same from study to study
does not reference when a child first starts to use a sound
age at which some fixed % of children in the sample used the sound correctly, with the sound’s position in the word typically taken into account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what kind of study is sander 1972

A

cross sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

methods of sander 1972

A

reinterpreted data from templin and wellman et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sander left edge of the bar

A

age at which 50% of kids from templin and wellman produced the sound correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

right edge of bar sander

A

age at which 90% of kids from templin and wellman produced the sound correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

which word positions were tracked in Sander (1972)

A

2/3 in customary production
2/3 in mastery production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Smit and Colleagues (1990) population and type of study

A

cross sectional; 500 children in Iowa and 465 children in Nebraska

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Smit and Colleagues (1990) purpose

A

reported what % of children in an age group were able to produce each sound correctly; initial and final reported separate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Smit an Colleagues (1990) findings

A

differences between male and female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a longitudinal study

A

one set of kids followed over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stoel-gammon (1985) methods and type

A

34 children; longitudinal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

primary interest of Stoel-Gammon

A

if children use the sound at all consistently but not looking for using them correctly

17
Q

reported in stoel-gammon

A

at least 50% of children use the sounds in 2+ different words
differences tracked between emerging initial and final consonants

18
Q

what is a relative study

A

depends on adult expectations in how to count data

19
Q

what is an independent analysis

A

does not depend on any adult expectations

20
Q

generalizations from stoel-gammon

A
  1. word-initial and word-final are different in acquisition
  2. voiced consonants emerge first- stops tend to emerge first
  3. in word-final, the voiceless stops occur first
  4. as kids get older, more sounds are acquired
21
Q

Robb & Bleile (1994) type and criteria

A

longitudinal study; @ least 605 of children in 2+ different words
all transcribiable productions were counted including babbling

22
Q

Robb & Bleile (1994) results

A

data suggests that kids want to start using sounds before their 1st words

23
Q

Paul and Jennings (1992) results

A

syllables indicate sounds produced which results in syllable structure levels

24
Q

Paul and Jennings (1992) level 1

A

CV syllables: C voiced syllabic, V voiced

25
Paul and Jennings (1992) level 2
CVC or VC (or CV not in level 1)
26
Paul and Jennings (1992) level 3
syllables with 2+ different consonant types with no regard to voicing differences
27
clinical implications of Paul and Jennings (1992)
20-50 child vocalization are needed to identify a child's level of syllable production
28
at what age should my client be producing their sound? instead ask
when could the child start to want to use the sound even in babbling?
29
Lof (2004) takeaways
normative data on consonant development should not be used for assessment or to diagnose Smit (1993): irregular errors are more likely to affect the overall intelligibility and more indicative of a disorder
30
what should be used to diagnose
norm-referenced assessments on all sounds (GFTA-3 and Con Lewis)
31
shriberg (1993)
developmental sound classes
32
developmental shriberg class early
m, b, j, n, w, d, p, h
33
developmental shriberg class middle
t, ŋ, k, g, f, v, tʃ, dʒ
34
developmental shriberg class late
ʃ, θ, ð, s, z, l, r, ʒ