Chapter 2/3 (week 2) Flashcards

1
Q

Why should we not rely on personal experience over research?

A

Experience has no comparison group and is confounded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is a comparison group important when conducting research?

A

Because what if there is a better method/solution than the initial one used? Ex: radical mastectomies vs simple mastectomies. Radical were used for years but after a long time simple ones were found to do the exact same thing AND save the lymph nodes and chest wall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Confound

A

a potential alternative explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does it mean that experience is confounded?

A

We can be biased in what we think causes an outcome, but there’s usually confounds that we didn’t eliminate. Ex: a bath at bedtime is what helps my baby sleep better. Could it really be due to your interaction with the baby?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

6 points that make research better than personal experience

A

-comparison groups
-rules out confounds
-dig deeper
-looks at weight of evidence
-theory-data cycle
-publication/peer-review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Although we know research is better than personal experience what is one thing to keep in mind about research?

A

Scientific findings are not expected to explain 100% of cases. There are always exceptions and research is probabilistic!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4 things to consider before trusting authority figures

A

-source of their ideas?
-did they provide subjective/personal opinion?
-they may be biased
-different authorities may disagree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Halo effect

A

people who think that since they excel in their field they excel in all fields

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

consensus/common sense

A

accepting a conclusion because it’s accepted by the majority of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

famous example of a consensus that’s actually incorrect

A

“opposites attract” is widely believed but there’s actually research that supports the opposite.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

intuition (in research)

A

believing something based on a gut feeling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what’s the main limitation of relying on intuition?

A

it’s often biased and can lead to worse decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

4 non-scientific sources of knowledge

A

personal experience
authority
intuition
consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

5 forms of intuition bias

A

present/present bias
availability heuristic
being swayed by a good story
confirmation bias
bias blind spot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

being swayed by a good story

A

accepting something because it feels natural/”makes sense”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

availability heuristic

A

-incorrectly estimating the frequency of an event by relying on what comes to mind easiest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

example of availability heuristic

A

“im scared of planes because they crash often”
-do they crash often or are plane crashes just reported more frequently than successful plane travel?
-example of overestimation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

present/present bias

A

incorrectly estimating the relationship between event and outcome. we rely on what’s present and FAIL TO CONSIDER WHAT’S ABSENT

19
Q

confirmation bias

A

tendency to look only at info that agrees with our beliefs

20
Q

bias blind spot

A

denying/being unaware of biases in oneself

21
Q

why is there typically a group of researchers/hiring committee/etc. rather than just 1 person in charge?

A

bias blind spot.

22
Q

what 2 things are people with a bias blind spot less likely to do?

A

accept advice from others & learn from training that would help them make better decisions

23
Q

primary sources

A

report DIRECTLY from the results of an empirical study/ies

24
Q

secondary sources

A

summarize past findings or produce a new theory

25
Q

components of a journal article IN ORDER

A
  1. abstract
  2. introduction
  3. methods
  4. results
  5. discussion
  6. references
26
Q

3 parts of a research introduction

A

-background info/motivation for study
-review of past literature
-study’s purpose and hypotheses

27
Q

abstract

A

concise summary of the article

28
Q

research paper discussion

A

interpretation of the results WITH RESPECT TO THE HYPOTHESES

29
Q

in articles with multiple studies, each study can have its own what?

A

intro, methods, results and discussion

30
Q

disinformation

A

a news story, photo, video, etc. deliberately created to be false or misleading

31
Q

what may stay the same in one study but could vary in another?

A

a constant

32
Q

how many levels does a variable have?

A

at least 2

33
Q

measured vs manipulated variables

A

measured: levels are observed/recorded
manipulated: controlled by researchers

34
Q

in what type of study are variables manipulated?

A

causal/experiments.

35
Q

2 reasons why some variables can only be measured and not manipulated

A
  1. naturally occurring attributes (age, gender, etc.)
  2. ethics
36
Q

most of this type of variable can be both measured and manipulated

A

physiological

37
Q

4 types of “roles” of variables

A

subject variables (self-esteem)
context variables (privacy)
stimulus variables (something presented that provokes a response)
response variables (test performance)

38
Q

2 data types of variables

A

quantitative: levels differ in amount
qualitative: levels differ in quality/type

39
Q

where do categorical, ordinal and nominal variables belong to?

A

categorical and nominal - qualitative
ordinal - quantitative

40
Q

main difference between conceptual definition and operational definition of a variable

A

the operational definition defines the method that a variable is measured/manipulated; a conceptual definition is just an abstract/theoretical statement about a variable.
ex: hunger: number of hours of food deprivation (operational)
hunger: desire for food (conceptual)

41
Q

3 reasons why operational definition are important

A

-replication
-forces researchers to clarify ideas
-objectivity and public verification

42
Q

relation of variables in experimental studies vs non-experimental studies

A

experimental: IV is manipulated, DV is measured
non-experimental: predictor variable is assumed IV, criterion variable is assumed DV

43
Q

difference in IV in experimental vs non-experimental studies

A

experimental: manipulated
non-experimental: measured