Chapter 14 Flashcards

1
Q

3 key components of the best practices/open science

A

transparency
reproducibility
replicability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reproducibility

A

reproducing identical results from the same data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

replicability

A

replicating results generated from older data by collecting new data through similar procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does replication give to a study

A

credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 types of replication

A

direct replication
conceptual replication
replication-plus-extension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

direct replication

A

the original study is repeated as similarly as possible to determine whether the original effect is found in the new data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

conceptual replication

A

the same research question and same conceptual variables but different operationalizations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in replication plus extension in what 2 ways can you replicate the original study

A
  1. add another level to an existing IV
  2. add another variable (makes it a factorial design)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what does a meta-analysis yield?

A

a quantitative summary of a scientific literature/ an average of the effects from all studies (published and unpublished( on the same variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

scientific literature

A

series of related studies conducted by different researchers who have tested similar variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

limitations to meta-analyses

A

null and opposite effects are rarely published so a meta analysis might overestimate the true effect size (file drawer problem)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

solution to the file drawer problem of meta-analyses

A

actively seek unpublished data and use social media forums

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

origin of the replication crisis

A

only 39% of a random sample of 100 studies published in journals had been replicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

recommended rxns to the replication crisis

A
  1. ask why replication studies might fail
  2. ask what the best practices are to improve reproducibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why might a study fail to replicate?

A

-if direct replication was used when it doesn’t make sense to use it
-if the researchers relied on only 1 replication study
-questionable research practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

best known QRPs

A

underreporting null fx
p-hacking
HARKing
using small samples

17
Q

how does underreporting null fx influence readers?

A

makes people think that the effects are stronger than they actually are

18
Q

p-hacking

A

when researchers try running different statistical analyses or computing their data differently than they originally intended (in hopes of obtaining a significant p value, it’s not done intentionally but they can become biased and not be aware they’re doing it)

19
Q

HARKing

A

hypothesizing after the results are known; misleads readers about the strength of the evidence

20
Q

why can a small sample size be problematic

A

the study’s estimate is usually imprecise and not replicable because it doesn’t take many extreme variables to greatly influence the data set

21
Q

best practices for scientific studies

A

pre-registration
power analysis
report all analyses
report all variables measured
report all conditions

22
Q

pre-registration

A

preregister the study’s methods, hypotheses and statistical analyses online BEFORE DATA COLLECTION

23
Q

power analysis

A

determines the adequate sample size according to the design; done before submission to ethics committee

24
Q

what 2 factors are considered in external validity

A

-how well the results can generalize to a population of interest
-how the sample was selected (random?)

25
Q

is a study fundamentally flawed if it does not use a representative sample?

A

NO

26
Q

is a large sample more representative than a small sample?

A

NO

27
Q

ecological validity

A

the extent to which a study’s tasks and manipulations are similar to what people experience in real life

28
Q

mundane realism

A

replicating what people experience in real life

29
Q

theory-testing mode

A

testing association or causal claims to support a theory, and external validity is NOT a priority

30
Q

famous example of theory-testing mode theory

A

contact comfort theory

31
Q

generalization mode

A

generalizing findings from the sample to other populations or contexts, external validity IS a priority

32
Q

cultural psychology

A

a special area of generalization mode, some cultures see things differently than other cultures (ex: Muller-Lyer illusion)

33
Q

WEIRD sample

A

western educated industrialized rich and democratic samples. be aware of studies that are primarily based on these

34
Q

experimental realism

A

the extent to which participants experience authentic emotions and behaviors

35
Q

how is the importance of a study not solely determined by external validity and mundane realism

A

when a study is capable of allowing participants to experience authentic emotions (experimental realism)