1.4 Pollution control: targets Flashcards
(17 cards)
flow pollution
Occcurs when damage results from the flow of residuals
how much that is emitted at a certain point in time
noise pollution, light pollution, heat pollution
stock pollution
Damages are depended only on the stock of pollutant in the relevant environmental system at any point in time
How much has accumulated in the past years
GHG in atmosphere, nuclear wastes, N & P in rivers, …
point source pollution
The source of the pollution is well-delineated
diffuse source pollution
There are so many points sources that it’s less easy to clearly identify one single spot of pollution
- makes it more difficult to set targets
uniformly mixing pollution
The pollution spreads quickly (air & water) and spatial concentrations don’t vary that much
- carbon, GHG, …
- uniform spatial distribution
- quick dispersion
- location of the source is irrelevant
- the total amount of emissions matter
non-uniformly mixing pollution
spatial concentrations vary a lot
- location of the source is important
- ozone accumulation, oxides, N, S, particulate pollutant, trace metal emissions
- mostly water and ground pollutants
trade-off
there are costs and benefits to pollution which need to be evaluated
Weighing strict versus less restrictive targets
benefit: without pollution the production would not be possible
optimization: marginal benefits (reduced pollution damage) = marginal benefits (avoided control costs)
damages
the costs that come with emissions
externality; pollution is an unintended negative side effect (negative adverse externality)
The total damage will rise at an increasing rate with the size of pollution
net benefits of pollution
the pollution benefits - pollution damages (B(m) - D(m))
The net benefit will increase at a decreasing rate with the size of pollution
abatement cost
the economic sacrifice that comes with reducing the cost for the environment (pollution costs/damages)
CDW
critical deposition value
= amount of N-depos that a specific ecosystem can tolerate WO loss of biodiversity
(Natura 2000)
luchtbeleidsplan
mainly targets transportation emissions (like N)
2019
nitrogen agreement
mainly target on livestock sector; but still negotiations
- area-based approach
- emission threshold NH3 and NOX (licensing framework)
- generic emission reduction obligations (barn-level by 2030)
- buying out peak-loaders; they receive a compensation for closing (red list -> obliged by 2025, medium -> voluntary)
- manure stop in valuable nature ares from 2028
- monetary compensation for farmers (the sooner the action, the higher the compensation)
FARMERS
- unfeasable to farm under such strict regulations (mainly red-list companies)
shadow price
The economic value/ opportunity cost of emitting one extra unit of pollution in an optima efficient system
How much society should be willing to pay to avoid one more unit of pollution OR
How much value is lost (in terms of damage/regulation) when one more unit is emitted.
Theoretical price for taxes/ trade-system to ensure efficient pollution control
intertemportal models
dB/dM = dD/dA [1 /(r+alpha)]
double dividend hypothesis
Two types of benefits that come at the same time by raising environmental taxes
Joint benefits result in enhancing welfare impacts substantially.
Reduces the marginal rates of other taxes in the economy
Improving enviorenment AND efficiency gains accur in the economy as a whole
pollution policy
Economic efficiency isn’t the only or main objective
- sustainability & economic goals
- human health protection
- public preferences