02_Different Cultural Models Flashcards
Definition
Cultural Models
Fyberg & Markus, 2007
Cultural models consist of ideas and habits, which are derived from culture and are present in everyday life
5 Cultural Models
and # of cultural Dimensions
- Hofstede [1970?80/2010]: 6 Dimensions
- Hall&Hall [1976/90]: 4 Dimensions
- Trompenaars [1993]: 7 Dimensions
- Schwartz [1994]: 3 Dimensions
- Globe Study [2004]: 9 Dimensions
Cultural Dimensions
Definition
- show similarities and differences between national cultures
Hofstede’s
Cultural Model
6 Dimensions to distinguish culture
- Power Distance [PDI]
- Uncertainty Avoidance [UAI]
- Indivualism vs. Collectivism [IDV]
- Masculinity vs. Femininity [MAS]
- Long vs. Short term orientation [LTO]
- Indulgence vs. Restraint [IND]
Hofstede’s Approach
Cultural Model
- measuring of work-related values
- surveyed over 116.000 employees of IBM in many countries
- identification of 4 cultural dimensions) in 1980 [power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity]
- amendment of a 5th dimension [long-term orientation] in 1991
- amendment of 6th dimension [indulgence] in 2010
Power Distance
Hofstede’s 1st cultural dimension
Simple Definition
- examines the extent to which a culture accepts unequal power distribution.
Cultures with Lower Power distance…
- power differences in institutions and organizations are not tolerated and not accepted
- low income equality
- larger middle class, smaller lower class
- use of power is legitimate
- systems change by evolution
- **younger (business) executives **
- spontaneous innovations
Cultures with High Power Distnace
- power differences in institutions and organizations are tolerated and accepted
- high income inequality
- smaller middle class, larger lower class
- oligarchy
- revolution to change system
- older (business) executives
- innovations only when supported by hiearchy
Uncertainty Avoidance
Hofstede’s 2nd cultural dimension
Simple Definition
- can be defined as the extent to which members of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations
- shows to what extent unclear and ambiguous situations create feelings of insecurity and anxiety in a culture [Layes 2010]
Cultures with strong Uncertainty avoidance
- rules to regulate private and public life are binding
- unclear circumstances lead to disorientation
- uncertainty is avoided
- more stress and anxiety
- feeling of “what is different is dangerous’
- a need for rules
- low adoptance of innovations
- people tend to stay in the same jobs
- less tolerance towards people whoch are different to oneself
Cultures with weak uncertainty avoidance
- rules to regulate private and public life are not binding
- unclear or chaotic circumsatnces are handled quite easily
- uncertainty is normal
- less stress and anxiety
- feeling of “what is different is curious”
- don’t like rules
- faster adoptance of innovations
- change of job is easier done
- more tolerance twoards people who are different to oneself
Individualism
Hofstede’s 3rd cultural dimension
Simple definition
- shows the extent the members of a culture define themselves as part of a social network and how commiteted they are to this network [Layes 2010]
Members of individualistic cultures
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions
- perceive themselves as autonomous individuals
- personal goals must not be aligned and reached in accordance with the group
- e.g. US, Australia, UK, Netherlands, Canada
Members of Collectivist cultures
Hofstede’s 3rd cultural dimension
- perceive themselves as members of a group, relationship-oriented
- personal goals should be aligned and reached in accordance with the group
- e.g. Ecuador, Venezuela, Pakistan, Indonesia, China
Masculinity
Hofstede’s 4th cultural dimensions
Simple Definition
- shows the extent gender roles are delineated and predefined [Layes 2010]
Masculine cultures…
- preference in society for achievement, heroism, assertiveness, and material rewards for success
- society at large is more competitive
- gender roles clearly defined
- e.g. Japan, Austria, Italy, Venezuela
Feminine cultures
Hofstede’s cultural dimension
- preference in society for cooperation, modesty, caring for the weak and quality of life
- society at large is more consensus-oriented
- both, men and women, can assume almost all roles in society
- gender roles are not limited to clearly defined characteristics
- e.g. Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, Angola
How is the Masculinity Index measured
- 100 for most masculine
- 0 for most feminine
Long-Term Orientation
Hofstede’s 5th cultural dimension
Simple Definition
- shows to what extent long-term thinking is valued [Layes 2010]
Long-Term oriented cultures..
Hofstede’s 5th cultural dimension
- present influenced by long-standing traditions
- today’s actions are binding for the future
- stable and binding social structures over generations
- e.g. South Korea, Japan, Chinea, Germany
Short-Term oriented cultures
Hofstede’s 5th cultural dimension
- traditions have nostalgic value
- social change easily mobilized
- unstable and non-commercial social conditions
- e.g. Egypt, Ghana, Iran, Morocco, Nigeria
Indulgence
Hofstede’s 6th cultural dimension
Simple Definition
- tendency to allow relatively free gratification of basic and natural human desires related to enjoying life and having fun
- its opposite pole, restraint reflects a conviction that such gratification needs to be curbed and regulated by strict social norms
Critiques of Hofstede model
3 items
-
Appropriateness of the Sample
- conducted at 1 company (IBM)
- employees may not be representative sample of general population -
Labeling of Terms
- Hofstede studied business cultures and manager’s attitudes
- insight may not shed light on core societal culture and values that are prevalent in given society or on a society’s behaviour patterns -
Other Biases
- survey based on questionnare and scales that were developed for western societies
- terms used in questionnaire may not be exactly translated accross culture (may have entirely different meanings in other cultures)
Hall’s approach to study cultural dimensions
2 items
- identification of fundamental dimensions of human co-existence which are relevant to all cultures
- identification of 4 cultural dimension
- Context, space, time, information flow in 1985 and 1990
Hall’s 4 Dimension model
4 items to distinguish types of cultures
1. Context: Low context vs. high context
2. Space: Low personal distance vs. High personal distance
3. Time: Monochronic time vs. Polychronic time
4. Information FLow: Low information flow vs. high information flow
Context
Hall’s 1st cultural dimension
Simple definition
Context
Low context cultures
Hall’s 1st cultural dimension
Explicit manner to transmit a message
- most of the information is in the coded, explicit, transmitted part of the message
- very little of the information is in the person who transmitters the message
- low non-linguistic context (explicit information transfer with as little space for interpretation as possible)
- separate personal relationships, work and other aspects of day-to day life
- need detailed background infromation
e.g. US, Central and North European cultures
High Context Cultures
Halls 1st cultural dimension
Implicit manner to transmit a message
- most of the information is in the person who transmitters the message
- high non-linguistic ocntext (e.g. suing nonverbal signs, metaphors)
- very little of the information is in the coded, explicit, transmitted part of the message
- have extensive information networks among family, friends ,colleagues and lcients
- do not need detailed background information
e.g. Asian, Arabian, Mediterranea cultures
Hall’s 2nd cultural dimension
Space
Hall’s 2nd cultural dimension
Space
Definitiont
Layes (2020)
- concept of space, for instance, applies to cultural differenes in terms of personal distance and the way in which it is automatically applied in interactions with friends or business partners
Depending on culture, people determine their intimate personal, social and public spae differently