04 Behavioral Assessment / 04.08 Analyze Functional Analysis Data Flashcards
Which function do the data support?
automatic reinforcement or undeterminable
automatic reinforcement, attention, demand
demand, automatic reinforcement, attention, play
attention and demand
automatic reinforcement or undeterminable
Note that the rate of self-injury is similar across all conditions. This suggests either an automatic reinforcement function or the function cannot be determined. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 258-261; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function do the data support?
attention and demand
(undeterminable)
automatic reinforcement
attention
attention
The rate of self-injury is consistently highest in the attention condition. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 258-261; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function(s) do the data support?
food
attention
toy
attention and access to toy
attention and access to toy
Note that the rate of self-injury is consistently highest in the attention and toy conditions. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 261-262; Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007, pp. 505-506; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function do the data support?
automatic reinforcement and attention
attention
(undeterminable)
escape
escape
The rate of self-injury is consistently highest in the demand condition. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 258-261; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function(s) do the data support?
attention and escape
escape and automatic reinforcement
(undeterminable)
automatic reinforcement
attention and escape
Which function(s) can you be most confident that the data support (given that a person delivers the food and toy)?
attention, toy, and food
attention
attention and access to toy
food and toy
attention
There is a confound if a person is providing the food and toy, and if you have a high rate in the attention, food, and toy conditions. That is, you don’t know whether the high rate in the food and toy conditions is a function of receiving those items or receiving attention. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 261-262; Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007, pp. 505-506; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function(s) do the data support?
tangible
attention
automatic reinforcement
demand
automatic reinforcement
In addition to a possible attention function, which functions do the data support?
escape and automatic reinforcement
(undeterminable)
automatic reinforcement only
(none of the others)
escape and automatic
Note that the rate of self-injury is consistently highest in the demand and alone conditions. The moderate rate in the attention condition may indicate an attention function, as well. An alternative explanation for the attention function is that it is high relative to the play condition because competing (play) behavior is occasioned in the play condition. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 261-262; Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007, pp. 505-506; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function(s) do the data support?
(undeterminable)
automatic reinforcement and attention
escape
attention
escape
Which function(s) do the data support?
automatic reinforcement or undeterminable
attention
demand
attention and demand
automatic reinforcement or undeterminable
The relatively low rate in the demand condition, supports an automatic reinforcement function. Why?
Automatic reinforcement is equally available in all conditions.
The only alternative hypothesis is that there is no function, which is unacceptable.
Behavior requested in the demand condition competes with behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Behavior requested in the alone condition competes with behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Behavior requested in the demand condition competes with behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
In the demand condition-the lowest data series-the individual is prompted to engage in behavior that is often incompatible with the behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement. For example, you can’t usually hand mouth and work on an academic assignment at the same time. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 261-262; Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007, pp. 505-506; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function(s) do the data support? escape and automatic reinforcement exclusively attention automatic reinforcement only escape, automatic reinforcement, and attention
escape, automatic reinforcement, and attention
Note that the rate of self-injury is consistently highest in the demand and alone conditions. However, the moderate rate in the attention condition may indicate an attention function, as well. An alternative explanation for the attention function is that the play condition is lower than demand and attention because play behavior competes with the behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 261-262; Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007, pp. 505-506; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Which function do the data support?
(undeterminable)
tangible
attention
demand
(undeterminable)
Which function(s) do the data support?
(undeterminable)
tangible
demand
attention
(undeterminable)
Note that the rate of self-injury is undifferentiated among conditions, which indicates an automatic reinforcement function or that a function could not be determined. (Alberto & Troutman, 2003, pp. 261-262; Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007, pp. 505-506; Iwata et al, 2000, pp. 68-69)
Aside from the data being largely undifferentiated, why is an automatic reinforcement function the best hypothesis?
Behavior in the alone condition competes with behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Automatic reinforcement is equally available in all conditions.
The only alternative hypothesis is that there is no function, which is unacceptable.
Behavior prompted in demand condition competes with behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, resulting in a reduced rate.
Behavior prompted in demand condition competes with behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, resulting in a reduced rate.
The behavior that is prompted in the demand condition is probably incompatible with the behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, thus rendering the target behavior less available.