ADHD Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

Diagnosis of ADHD DSM-4 5 criteria

A

Criterion A - E.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 parts of criterion A

A
  1. Split into 2 categories (inattention and hyperactivity).
  2. Children must exhibit 6+ symptoms in either category.
  3. Symptoms persisted for at least 6 months that is inconsistent for developmental level.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rate of school children with ADHD

A

3-5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Examples of inattention

A

Difficulty sustaining attention, giving close attention to details, does not seem to listen when spoken to, forgetful, distractible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hyperactivity/impulsivity examples

A

Fidgets with hands/feet/squirms in seat, leaves seat when sitting is expected, talks excessively/blurts out answers, interrupts or intrudes on others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criterion B

A

Symptoms present before age 7 (12 in DSM-5).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Criterion C

A

Symptoms exhibited in 2+ settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Criterion D

A

Clear evidence of clinically significant impairment in social/school functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Criterion E

A

Cannot be better accounted for by another disorder (changed in DSM-V).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proportion of children with ADHD having inattentive/combined/hyperactive type

A
  1. Inattentive: 27%.
  2. Combined: 55%.
  3. Hyperactive: 18%.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Durston et al. (2003) ADHD brain function in go/nogo Pokemon task

A

ADHD children had greater difficulties on all nogo trials. ADHD children had lower levels of activity for control-related circuits (frontostriatal/frontoparietal).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cortese et al. (2012) meta-analysis of networks in ADHD

A

Multiple networks in addition to the classic frontostriatal and fronto parietal network.

For adults: hypofunction in frontoparietal and somatomotor networks; hyperfunction in default, ventral attention, and dorsal attention networks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gene x environment interaction

A

High-risk COMT gene more susceptible to adverse effects of low birth weight.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 single-risk accounts of ADHD

A
  1. Executive difficulties.
  2. Attention difficulties.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which specific executive dysfunction in ADHD and 2 tasks?

A

Inhibition deficit.

  1. Go/nogo task: impact on ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
  2. Stop-signal task: impact on ability to inhibit an already inhibited response.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Inhibition in stop-signal task when signal appears immediately after go stimulus vs. after a long time.

A

Inhibition is easy when immediately after (way before response about to occur). Inhibition much harder when just about to respond.

17
Q

2 measures of performance in stop-signal task

A
  1. Probability of inhibition at each stop-signal delay.
  2. Stop-signal reaction time.
18
Q

Schachar et al. (2000) stop-signal task in ADHD

A

Probability of inhibiting accurately is lower in ADHD than in controls at all lengths of stop-signal delays (period between go and stop).

19
Q

Development of ADHD

A

Children rarely remain in the hyperactive type classification over time. Mostly shift to combined type.

Development disorder - suggests not a single, underlying core deficit.

20
Q

Martinussen et al. (2005) meta-analysis on WM in ADHD

A

Effect sizes for spatial storage/central executive WM greater than verbal storage/central executive WM.

21
Q

Sounga-Barke et al. (2003) study on executive dysfunction and delay aversion in ADHD

A

Executive dysfunction and delay aversion make significant independent contributions to predictions
of ADHD symptoms.

21
Q

Are all EFs affected in ADHD?

A

Shifting does not always seem to be affected. WM/maintenance seems to be affected (alongside inhibition).

22
Q

4 problems with EF account

A
  1. Developmental nature of ADHD.
  2. Not all EFs are affected.
  3. Sensitivity (some children with ADHD do well on EF tasks).
  4. Specificity (the profile of executive difficulties in ADHD and autism overlaps).
23
Q

Attention difficulties account

A

More basic aspects of attention (compared to higher-order executive aspects of attention that overlap with EF).

24
Which aspects of attention are affected in ADHD?
1. Selective attention and spatial orienting are normal. 2. Difficulties in sustained attention (vigilance/arousal).
25
How does sustained attention to response task (SART) differ from classic no-go tasks?
Go/nogo involves repeating 'go' signals with infrequent 'stop' signals. SART uses a constant varied stream and needs continuous visual monitoring to detect the infrequent target letter.
26
Johnson et al. (2007) ADHD, HFA and NT controls on SART task
ADHD group made more omission errors (not responding when should have) than HFA and controls (both fixed and random SART). Both ADHD and HFA made more commision errors (responding when shouldn't have) than controls (in random SART).
27
Omission errors
Missed responses when should have responded (lapses in attention.
28
Commission errors
Responses when should have withheld (poor inhibition).
29
Attention in ADHD
Perhaps associated with both control and sustained attention skills. Impaired conflict and alerting networks in Attentional Network task.
30
Manly et al. (2001) test of everyday attention-children (TEA-Ch)
Robust difference between NT controls and children with ADHD. Selective attention, attentional control/switching/sustained attention seem to be related. Sustained attention most impaired, selective controls similar to controls.
31
Fair et al. (2012) on ADHD vs. control across multiple processes
ADHD differed from controls on all tasks, but different profiles occurred, with variable differences across profiles.
32