ADHD Flashcards
(33 cards)
Diagnosis of ADHD DSM-4 5 criteria
Criterion A - E.
3 parts of criterion A
- Split into 2 categories (inattention and hyperactivity).
- Children must exhibit 6+ symptoms in either category.
- Symptoms persisted for at least 6 months that is inconsistent for developmental level.
Rate of school children with ADHD
3-5%
Examples of inattention
Difficulty sustaining attention, giving close attention to details, does not seem to listen when spoken to, forgetful, distractible.
Hyperactivity/impulsivity examples
Fidgets with hands/feet/squirms in seat, leaves seat when sitting is expected, talks excessively/blurts out answers, interrupts or intrudes on others.
Criterion B
Symptoms present before age 7 (12 in DSM-5).
Criterion C
Symptoms exhibited in 2+ settings
Criterion D
Clear evidence of clinically significant impairment in social/school functioning
Criterion E
Cannot be better accounted for by another disorder (changed in DSM-V).
Proportion of children with ADHD having inattentive/combined/hyperactive type
- Inattentive: 27%.
- Combined: 55%.
- Hyperactive: 18%.
Durston et al. (2003) ADHD brain function in go/nogo Pokemon task
ADHD children had greater difficulties on all nogo trials. ADHD children had lower levels of activity for control-related circuits (frontostriatal/frontoparietal).
Cortese et al. (2012) meta-analysis of networks in ADHD
Multiple networks in addition to the classic frontostriatal and fronto parietal network.
For adults: hypofunction in frontoparietal and somatomotor networks; hyperfunction in default, ventral attention, and dorsal attention networks.
Gene x environment interaction
High-risk COMT gene more susceptible to adverse effects of low birth weight.
2 single-risk accounts of ADHD
- Executive difficulties.
- Attention difficulties.
Which specific executive dysfunction in ADHD and 2 tasks?
Inhibition deficit.
- Go/nogo task: impact on ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
- Stop-signal task: impact on ability to inhibit an already inhibited response.
Inhibition in stop-signal task when signal appears immediately after go stimulus vs. after a long time.
Inhibition is easy when immediately after (way before response about to occur). Inhibition much harder when just about to respond.
2 measures of performance in stop-signal task
- Probability of inhibition at each stop-signal delay.
- Stop-signal reaction time.
Schachar et al. (2000) stop-signal task in ADHD
Probability of inhibiting accurately is lower in ADHD than in controls at all lengths of stop-signal delays (period between go and stop).
Development of ADHD
Children rarely remain in the hyperactive type classification over time. Mostly shift to combined type.
Development disorder - suggests not a single, underlying core deficit.
Martinussen et al. (2005) meta-analysis on WM in ADHD
Effect sizes for spatial storage/central executive WM greater than verbal storage/central executive WM.
Sounga-Barke et al. (2003) study on executive dysfunction and delay aversion in ADHD
Executive dysfunction and delay aversion make significant independent contributions to predictions
of ADHD symptoms.
Are all EFs affected in ADHD?
Shifting does not always seem to be affected. WM/maintenance seems to be affected (alongside inhibition).
4 problems with EF account
- Developmental nature of ADHD.
- Not all EFs are affected.
- Sensitivity (some children with ADHD do well on EF tasks).
- Specificity (the profile of executive difficulties in ADHD and autism overlaps).
Attention difficulties account
More basic aspects of attention (compared to higher-order executive aspects of attention that overlap with EF).