Autism Flashcards

(20 cards)

1
Q

What is autism?

A

Impairments in social, communication and imaginative behaviours with presence of repetitive and repeated activity and interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The autistics triad

A
  1. Socialisation.
  2. Communication.
  3. Imagination.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DSM-5 autism criteria

A

Deficits in social communication and interaction + RRBIs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Simonoff et al. (2008) co-occurence of autism with other conditions

A
  1. 71% had at least one co-occurring disorder.
  2. 41% had 2+.
    Most commonly co-morbid with social anxiety, ADHD, and oppositional defiant disorder.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bailey et al. (1995) comparing MZ and DZ twins and autism

A

60% of MZ twins both had autism and 90% had the ‘broader phenotype’ (compared with 5% and 10% in DZ).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elsabbagh and Johnson (2010) rate of autism in siblings of autistic children

A

3-4% but higher than general population risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 main theories of autism

A
  1. ToM deficit.
  2. Executive dysfunction.
  3. Weak central coherence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) on autistic children and ToM Sally-Ann

A

80% of autistic children fail Sally-Anne task, but 85% controls pass. Conclude that autistic people are ‘mindblind’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 problems with ToM account

A
  1. Does not easily account for unusual strengths and weaknesses.
  2. Lacks sensitivity and specificity (some non-autistic children fail the task; some autistic children pass the task).
  3. Autistic people may struggle to understand the minds of non-autistic people, but the converse may also be true.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Baron-Cohen et al. (1997) reading the mind in the eyes task

A

Autistic adults less skilled at inferring
mental state from the eye region compared to Tourette’s and controls (evidence for subtle mindreading deficits in HFA?).

But varies according to a
person’s intelligence, education level,
race and ethnicity (Dodell-Feder et al.,
2019) and this task might also target
emotion processing rather than ToM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Senju et al. (2009) implicit and explicit mentalising in autism

A

Autistic people don’t show implicit, automatic mentalising. No difference between autistic and controls in standard tasks of FB or ToM, but autistic adults did not spontaneously anticipate others’ actions. Compensatory learning strategy (verbally-mediated reasoning)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Executive dysfunction theory

A

Autism associated with a similar profile to patients with executive disorder (associated with frontal damage) and elements of overlap with ADHD (-lanning, inhibition, flexibility).

EF could be a protective factor. Allows individuals at risk for developmental conditions to compensate for atypicalities in other brain systems early in life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Russell et al. (1991) windows task in autistic children

A

Like 3-year-olds, autistic children are often baited. Inhibition difficulties?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ozonoff and Jensen (1999) WCST and tower of Hanoi

A

Autistic people perform less well than controls. Difficulties in planning and flexibility?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Problem for executive dysfunction account of autism

A

Evidence for difficulties in EF, but not specific to autism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Central coherence account

A

Typical processing is characterised by desire for central coherence (gist or gestalt processing preferred - strive for overall meaning). Autism characterised by weak central coherence (local processing preferred over global processing).

17
Q

4 pieces of evidence for central coherence account

A
  1. Embedded figures (finding a shape in a complex object).
  2. Block construction (creating a cube from a sheet of paper).
  3. Less susceptible to illusions.
  4. Pronunciation of homographs in and out of context.
18
Q

Problems with central coherence account

A

Difficult to pin down experimentally and conceptually. How to define ‘global’ and ‘local’?

19
Q

Multiple risk account

A

Rather than trying to discover the cognitive cause of autism, is it more appropriate to consider autism as
comprising multiple cognitive differences, the manifestation of which depends on complex interactions between different patterns of strength and weaknesses across development. Autism is heterogeneous.