Genetics and Environment Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

2 contrasting approaches to cognitive development and influence of genes

A
  1. Constructivist: cognitive abilities emerge as a product of complex dynamic interactions between GxE.
  2. Nativist: genetic influences determine cognitive abilities (impaired specific modules).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fragile X prevalence and carriers

A
  1. Full mutation: 1/4000 males and 1/6000 females.
  2. Premutation carriers: 1/800 males and 1/260 females.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FXS genotype

A
  1. X-linked gene (FMR-1 gene silenced).
  2. FMR protein (FMRP) not expressed. Involved in regulating glutamatergic and GABAergic balance.

Affects dendritic morphology and neurotransmitter regulation (eg. dopamine).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FXS neuroscience

A

Decreased cerebellar vermis volume and hypoactivation across multiple cognitive control networks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FXS and rate of neurodiversity

A

By middle/late childhood:
1. 70% fulfill ADHD diagnosis.
2. 33-67% fulfill ASD diagnosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FXS strengths and weaknesses

A

Strengths: face recognition, LTM, receptive language.
Weaknesses: attention and EF, WM, social cognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cornish et al. (2013) big fish sustained attention and WM task FXS

A

Cross-sectional: TD children showed improvement in accuracy with age; FXS children showed flatter trajectories (developmental freeze in attention and memory?).

Longitudinal: unlike cross-sectional results suggested, there were also clear improvements in FXS children as they developed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 potential explanations of variability across individuals with same monogenic disorder

A
  1. Differences in environmental input over developmental time.
  2. Gene-gene interactions. How other genes involved in (eg. glutamate or GABA neurotransmission) interact.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ASD and ADHD symptoms related

A

ADHD symptoms may predict ASD symptoms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FXS and language ability

A

Verbal abilities of FXS better than visuo-spatial cognition.

Delayed early expressive and receptive vocabulary: expressive vocab at 1/3 normal rate, receptive vocab at 1/2 normal rate, poor syntax, poor pragmatics, highly repetitive speech.

Related to executive and attentional dysfunctions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FXS and attention and language

A

Early attention measures predict later language development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Other syndromes with genetic high risk for ADHD

A

Down syndrome and Williams syndome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Biological, cognitive, and behavioural differences of FXS

A
  1. Biological: dopamine-related genes, prefrontal and other differences.
  2. Cognitive: attention and social differences.
  3. Behavioural: inattention/hyperactivity, social anxiety, social interests.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 diagnostic criteria of foetal alcohol syndrome

A

Environmentally caused.
1. Specific patterns of facial features.
2. Pre- and postnatal growth anomalies.
3. Neurological dysfunction (microencephaly - small head - and developmental delay).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

5 discriminating features of foetal alcohol syndrome

A
  1. Short palpebral fissures (small horizontal eye openings).
  2. Flat midface.
  3. Short nose.
  4. Indistinct philtrum.
  5. Thin upper lip.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Foetal alcohol syndrome change in brain size and structure

A

Lower volume of cerebrum and cerebellum. Difference in corpus callosum.

17
Q

4 associated features of foetal alcohol syndrome

A
  1. Epicanthal folds (eye folds).
  2. Low nasal bridge.
  3. Minor ear anomalies.
  4. Micrognathia (small/receding lower jaw).
18
Q

IQ in foetal alcohol syndrome

A

Lower than controls.

19
Q

Foetal alcohol syndrome and EF and tower of london

A

Poor EF. Much more rule violations than controls.

20
Q

Which condition is foetal alcohol syndrome comorbid for?

21
Q

Foetal alcohol syndrome and language

A

A range of language difficulties.

22
Q

Dowstream consequences of foetal alcohol syndrome

A

MH problems, trouble with law, low educational achievement, high unemployment….

Protective role of environment too.

23
Q

Genie discovery

A

Discovered at 13;7. Had experienced extreme physical and psychological deprivation from 0;20.

24
Q

Genie progress

A

Good progress, but never acquired linguistic competence or normal social adjustment.

25
Skuse (1984) reviewing cases of deprivation
Children are likely to recover well from deprivation if there are not any major genetic problems, birth defects, or severe malnutrition.
26
3 strengths of English Romanian adoption study
1. Large N with longitudinal data into adulthood. 2. Early deprivation did not depend on parents (so genes random). 3. Child's age-at-adoption determined by fall of regime (time-in-care not related to child factors).
27
Physical catch-up of Romanian adopted children by 4 years of age
UK children heavier, taller, with larger heads. Difference most marked for late-adopted (>6months) children.
28
What determines physical and cognitive catch-up
Age at entry to UK: <6months cut-off. IQ for <6months comparable to UK sample.
29
Romanian and autism rate
6% showed autistic-like behaviour at 4 years; 6% showed milder autistic features. Higher than general population risk.
30
Romanian vs. UK children on autism distribution
Most Romanian adoptees scored similarly to UK adoptees on the ASQ. Most Romanian adoptees were not autistic.
31
Romanian follow-up autism
Most children no longer met autism criteria by age 11–12.
32
Romanian and ADHD
Much higher rate of ADHD in high deprivation compared to low deprivation group throughout life.
33
Outcomes associated with high deprivation
1. ADHD. 2. (Quasi) autism. 3. Low educational achievement and high unemployment 4. Higher rate of emotional and MH problems.
34
Institutional deprivation syndrome
1. Core difficulties are disinhibited social engagement and quasi-autism. 2. Associated difficulties are cognitive impairment and deprivation-specific ADHD. 3. Dose-related effect (>6 months) 4. Highly persistent over time, despite long-term strong environment support.