attachment Flashcards
(125 cards)
Summarise the findings of Hazen and Shaver’s love quiz
- 620 responses to newspaper articles (205m/415f)
- Secure - balance between closeness and independence (56%)
- Avoidant - avoiding closeness (25%)
- Anxious - Clingy, not coping well with independence (19%)
- questions that looked at childhood attachment types
What are some issues with Hazen and Shaver’s love quiz?
- self report methods may lead to social desirability etc
- volunteer sample, not the average person
- correlational research, is there actually a link…kagan again
What is the continuity hypothesis?
future relationships are based off of past ones + attachment styles
What study should you use to criticise influence on later realtionships?
Mccarthy (1999) - 40 women (who were assessed as children) and their children and grandparents
secure had higher self esteem and long lasting adult relationships, while insecure avoidant had poor romantic relationships and friends. Both insecure groups were more likely to have a deviant partner.
Avoids self- report issues of hazen and shaver
What are the pros/cons of research into later adult relationships?
- changing children’s internal working model
- most research is correlation, could be temperament…kagan
- this is deterministic
- this takes a nomothetic approach to relationships
- again self report methods
What is the AAI - adult attachment interview?Who?
Maine et al
- 20 qs one hour semi-structured interview looking at IWM
- coded based on the quality of the conversation
- Types = dissmissing…insecure/defensive
- autonomous…secure
- preoccupied…insecure
- unresolved…childhood trauma
What is Bowlby’s definition of attachment?
”
“The formation of a strong, reciprocal emotional bond between an infant and a primary caregiver that endures over time”
”
How did Bowlby disagree with learning theory?
”
Bowlby did not agree with learning theory as an explanation for attachment. Instead he looked at evolutionary reasons inspired by both Lorenz and Harlow’s work to find that innate system for attachment that lead to increased survival rates. He thought that by imprinting these animals were more likely to be protected from potential hazards.
”
What is Bowlby’s Monotropic theory? + 2 conditions?
”
Bowlby (1958, 1969) is monotropic because he focused on the care given by the main caring figure in the child’s life which he believed is more important than any other relationship. He had two conditons for this:
- The Law of Continuity states that the more constant and the more predictable the care for the child the better.
- The Law of Accumulation Seperation stated that the more seperation over time had an effect and therefore ‘the safest dose is a zero dose’.
“
What are social releasers?
”
He believed that babies were formed with a set of characteristics that made the parents give them more attention and defined these as social releasers. These social releasers would trigger the attachement between the child and the adult and would act as a reciprocal process.
”
What is the critical period?
”
The connection between child and adult attachment processes will strengthen this bond over time. This time period Bowlby called the critical period or a ‘sensative period’ which after the age of 2 ( if an attachment is not formed) will make it hard for the child to form relationships. ( Later Bowlby recognised this was not the be all and end all of attachment)
”
What is the internal working model?
”
The child, according to Bowlby forms a mental image of the relationship with their adult caregiver which he called the internal working model.This model will then form a model from which the child can work out how to form other relationships and therefore has large impact on future attachments. This can even extend to future parental sttachments when they have their own children.
”
What is the problem with mixed evidence for monotropy?
”
Mixed Evidence for Monotropy - Bowlby’s theory is not supported by Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) as they found that most babies did form a single attachment but a significant minority was also able to form multiple attachments at the same time. It is also unclear as to whther the Primary attachment figure is unique in how it is developed. A study by Suess et al(1992) showed that the mother’s attachment was significantly more important than that of the father’s. However this may just have shown that it was stronger, not exactly of a different quality. Therefore it is still not clear whether monotropy is a valid architype for developing attachments.
”
What is a support for social releasers?
”
Support for Social Releasers - There is evidence given by Brazelton et al (1975) that the ‘cute’ motions of a baby are linked to initiating an important social interaction. In this study they were able to observe interactional synchrony and then extended these observations into an experiment. Here primary carers were asked to not repond to the social releasers which lead to the baby feeling distress and then falling motionless. Therefore the strength of this response support’s Bowlby’s ideas about the significance of infant soicial behaviour and elicit caregiving.
”
What is the support for the IWM?
”
Support for Internal Working Models - With the IWM being testable this allows a prediction of patterns to be passed through generations. Bailey et al (2007) assessed 99 mothers and their attachment to their 1 year old babies using a standard interview procedure as well as observation. Those who stated they had poor relationships with their parents were more likely to be classed as having a poor attachment to their own child in observation. Therefore this shows that the IWM is passed through generations, forming the model for these future parental relationships.
”
How is monotropy a socially sensatice issue?
”
Monotropy is a Socially Sensative Idea - This theory could and does have a major effect on how mother’s choose to live when their child is in its early stages of development and attachment. Feminists such as Erica Burman have pointed out that this places a burden on mothers and sets them up to take the blame if their child has difficulty in later life. bowlby stated this was not his intention - he only wanted to emphasise the importance of the maternal role. Therefore, despite not being a direct attack, Bowlby’s theory could have unethical repercussions.
”
How may temperment be just as important?
”
Temperament may be as Important as Attachment - Kagan (1982) found that some children were more social or anxious, for example, due to their genetic make-up. This goes against Bowlby’s idea that attachment is key to a child’s social development. Therefore this research limits Bowlby’s explanation for attachment with these researchers accusing him of overemphasising the early stages in life.
”
How can the role differ?
”
- Not likely to be the primary caregiver
This can be supported by Schaffer and Emmerson - found that in the first 7 months children formed their main attahcments and saw that for only 3% of the children had this primar attachment to the father figure. 27% were found to share this first atatchment figure role. But by 18 months this had changed to an equal attachment between both carers as the father became the secondary attachment figure (proved by seperation protest when left the room).
Temporal validity is therefore a problem with this, at the time Glasgow benefitted form working with oil which menat that fathers were spending a lot more time away form their children.
”
How do we define the ‘father’ figure?
”
There does not need ot be a biological link. It is just the main male figure providing care in the child’s life. This definition can aslo be challenged by cultural norms of the time as this can shift (temporal validity) for example in the recent pandemic many fathers have been spending more time caring for their children.
”
What other role can the fathers fill (stduy)?
”
Grossman et al (2002) looked at the attachment of fathers ot their children up till they were teenagers. They found that there wa no significant effect on the other relationships that the child formed later on due to the father’s role in the relationship. Therefore they are no tpart of the IWM like the mothers.
”
What other role can the fathers fill?
”
- Foung that the father effected the interpersonal skills of the child (as adolecents)
- They determined that the fathers filled the role of the ‘primary socialiser’which the effect of is not seen until later on.
But this restricts the potential to have a ‘primary scoialiser’ within a single parenting or a lesbian environment. This sticks to the heterosexual norms that were formed as sociaetal norms. It then suggests that a lack of this influence will have a negative effect on the child. McCallum and Golombock (2004)’s research showed that children with thesse parenting methods do not have negative effects.Therefore Grossman’s theory overstates the importance of the ‘primary socialisier’ being the father.
And yet lesbian couples tend to take on a paternal-like role and a maternal role. This goes against M&G and shows how it is how the role is carried out rather than the gender that is performing that role. Therefore this is a limitation of M&G’s criticism.
”
What is the study by Tiffany Feilds?
”
In 1978 there was a study that used a method of emotional reactions when having 4 month year old children sit face to face with carer figures.
- Mothers who were the primary caregiver.
- Fathers who were the primary caregivers.
- Fathers who were the secondary caregivers.
Group 1 & 2 spent more time interacting and imitating each other demonstrating interactional synchrony and reciprocity.
Males have the same ability to be the primary caregiver as women however it did show that babies will only act in this way when a female figure is not there to care in the place of the father. Both tend to express similar levels of emotions.
THis is supported by the practivality of reassuring families with male caregivers in real life. It is effective practivle application.
However this form of research can be seen as steryotyping the heteronormative roles of males and females. Due to the study taking place in the first place it implies this bias is present.
”
What was BF Skinner’s reasoning behind Operant conditoning?
”
BF Skinner realised that people and animals can both learn though the same process, reinforcement or punishment, which he called operant conditioning.
If they carry out an action and are reward in some way ( positive reinforcement) or avoid something unpleasant ( negative reinforcement) then you will repeat it in the future.
If you are punished or the reinforcement stop happening, you will stop doing the behaviour.
”
What are the three key terms for opperant conditioning?
”
Positive Reinforcement - receiving something nice for doing an action.
Negative Reinforcement - avoiding something unpleasant for doing an action
Punishment – getting punished for doing something. When we receive something pleasant or avoid something unpleasant we find it rewarding and so repeat the action. When an action leads to something unpleasant we don’t repeat it.
”


