attachment Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

attachment

A

infant and caregiver develop a deep and emotional bond, and both members seek closeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reciprocity

A

turn-taking form of interacting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

interractinal synchrony

A

is a simultaneous interaction between caregiver and indant matching each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Schaffer stages of attachment

A

stages 1 asocial 0-6 weeks
Babies display innate behaviors such as crying and smiling, and anyone can comfort them and do not prefer any individual caregiver

Stage 2 Indiscriminate attachment 6 weeks-7 months
develop the ability to tell the difference between familiar and unfamiliar smiling more do not yet show anxiety

stage 3 specific attachment 7- 9 months
from a strong attachment to a primary caregiver, most of their mother,r and separation and stranger anxiety develop

stage 4 multiple attachments 9/10 months
Infants start to form attachments with other caregivers such as father and grandparents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

lorenz prodecure

A

randomly divided a clutch of goose eggs half-hatched in an incubator, and the first ‘thing’ they saw was Lorenz half-hatched with their mother
* Once hatched, the two groups were mixed up, and Lorenz observed who/what they followed
* he varied the time between birth and seeing a moving object so he could measure the critical period
for imprinting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

lorenz findings

A

The incubator group followed lorenz everywhere where as the control group who hatched with the mother followed her everywhere, when the groups were mixed they still followed there caregiver

the critical period was 32 hours if it did not have a anything to imprint on in this time it would lose the ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

lorenz evulation

A

can’t generalize between animals and humans

Lorenz’s research is able to compare to humans’ critical period, but humans are sensitive not ciricital later care can help with recovery

practical applications for the studies

ethitcs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

harlow prodecudure

A

-Momkeys taken from biological mother
- monkey sat in a cage with two suggerate mothers
- a wire mother with milk and cloth one for comfort
and scared to see which one is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

harlow findings

A

baby monkeys were with the cloth mother and only visiting the food mother when they needed to eat and also returned to the cloth mother when scared

monkeys with only the food one showed sign of stress related illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

harlow evulation

A

can’t generalize between animals and human

harlow findings in contact comfort able to be transferred

bad ethical grounds caused harm to the monkeys such as mating behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explanations of attach,ement

A

Learning theory
bolwby theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Learning theory

A

cupaord love that infant liek the caregiver cos they provide food

Classical conditioning food is an unconditioned stimulus providing pleasure and unconditioned response the mother gives the food and she become associated with food and pleasure

operant conditioning positive reinforcement when a parents feeds a crying baby they are more likely to cry so negatively reinformcent may use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Learning theory evaluation

A
  • makes intuitive sense that babies learn when thet cry they get things
    -Harlow’s experiment on monkeys disproved cupoard love
    -many parents think there relationship with their kids is more complex and this is reductionist
  • backed up by Pavlov and skinner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

insecure avoidant

A

infants explore freely and do not use their mother as a secure base, has low stranger anxiety and separation anxiety

caregivers show little sensitive responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

secure

A

infants use their mother as a safe base, they have a moderate level of stranger anxiety and show separation anxiety

caregivers show sensitive responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

insecure resistant

A

Infants are clingy and have high stranger and separation anxiety when the mothers returns, they don’t know whether to crave attention but also reject attention

mothers incosnient with sensitive responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

strange siutations stages

A
  1. The child is encouraged to explore
  2. A stranger comes in and tries to interact with the child
  3. caregiver leaves strangers and child
  4. The caregiver returns and the stranger leaves
  5. The caregiver leaves the child alone
  6. The Stanger Returns
  7. The caregiver returns and is reunited with the club
18
Q

Strange situations evolutions

A
  • low egocigal validity
    -culture bound test as its in america
  • meta-analysis
    -demand characteristics mothers may show more sensitive responsive to look a good parent
19
Q

the role of the father

A

Schaffer found that 75% of infants formed an attachment with their father, showing separation anxiety and proving they played an important role

active play engages is more play activities to encourage risk taking behaviors

20
Q

bowlbys monotropic theory

A

He argues infants have an innate and instinctual drive to form a strong attachment to their other and stay in close proximity

Babies will use signals/social releases to attract the caregiver, mothers are biologically programmed to find this cute or distressing

21
Q

Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory Critical Period

A

Bowlby suggests a strong monotropic attachment must form in the first 30 months of birth, and a lack of this will result in permanent negative social, intellectual, and emotional consequences

Bowbly also claims the monotropic relationship makes a schema called an internal working model. This is a blueprint for future relationships

22
Q

Cultural variation study

A

A 1988 study by van L conducted a large-scale meta-analysis of 2000 infants in 32 studies from 8 countries classided the attachment types via the strange situation test

23
Q

boblwy maternal deprivation

A

if there is not a monotripic attachment during the critical period of 30 months due to prolonged separation, this is negative and irreversible and will also result in

delinquency and petty crime (social)
unable to care or show empathy (emotional)
low IQ and bad cognitive abilities
failure to form internal working model

24
Q

maternal deprivation evulation

A

44 thieves and 44 normal kids were tested for affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation and the thieves tested more

findings could be linked to a thrid factor

leads to positive change in polices related to child welfare

disregards role of the father

25
care giver and infant interactions evaluation
Meltzoff and Moore an experiment displayed gestures such as sticking tongue out to 12-21 day infants and they replicated through imitation condon and sander videotaped interactions between adults and infants and saw evidence of interactional synchrony - the infants cant provide thoughts or emotions saw its all infrence
26
Schaffer's stages of attachment evaluation
Schaffer and Emerson conducted an observation of 60 working-class babies from Glasgow and found separation anxiety occurred in25-32 week stranger anxiety a month later 18 months follow-up showed 87% had devolpled multiple attachments high mundane realism not generalizable due to it only being glasgow
27
Bowlby's monotropic theory evulation
helped with early child care, for example, immediate physical contact between mother and child The internal working model can be seen as deterministic temporal validity as only says mum can form a strong bond and disregards role of the father
28
sensitive response
adult caregiver correctly interperts the meaning of the infants communication and is motivated to respond
29
lorenz research suggestion
imprinting is a strong evolutionary biological feature of attachment and imprinting is with the first large object visually seen not other potential cues such as smell and sound
30
strange siutations findinga
three distiicive attachment types that collerated with the level of sensitive responsivenss 66% secure 22% insecure avoidant 12% incescure resistant
31
cultural variation findings
Secure attachment was the most common ( britian) Insecure resistant was the least common (Germany) Avoidance was more common in western cultures (iseral) china had the least secure infants
32
cultral varation study evulation
lack temporal validty due to change nature of family life in the modern world many of the countries such as china and britinan only had one study done so may not be represintve of the country population
33
romain oprhan studies background
in the 1990s, after the Romanian government, 170k children were found in extremely poor Romanian orphanages. They had very little emotional care, poor nutrition. British researchers, led by Michael Rutter, used this tragic situation as a "natural experiment" to study the effects of institutionalisation.
34
Roman orphan studies procedure
Sample: 165 Romanian orphans adopted by British families, compared to a control group of 52 British adoptees. Adoption ages: Group 1: Adopted before 6 months old Group 2: Adopted between 6 months and 2 years Group 3: Adopted after 2 years Follow-up: Assessed at ages 4, 6, 11, and 15 years. Data was gathered through interviews and cognitive/emotional assessments.
35
Romaina oprhan studies findings
Cognitive Development (IQ): Those adopted before 6 months had a mean IQ of 102 at age 11. 6 months–2 years: ~86 After 2 years: ~77 Attachment Styles: Children adopted after 6 months showed signs of disinhibited attachment: clingy, attention-seeking, affectionate with strangers. Those adopted earlier rarely showed this.
36
Romanina Orphanage Studies evaluation
pratical application such as crivital workers in care place have to giver higher level of care to infants - bias due to the parents picking the kids with the more socialable kids being picked for adoption at a younger age - natural test
37
hazen and shaver
argued an adult relationship type is a continuation of their infant attachment style The researchers placed a “Love Quiz” in a local American newspaper with three sections Participants chose which of 3 descriptions best matched their feelings and behaviour in close relationships: Questions about beliefs on love, e.g. “Do you believe in lasting love?”, and past relationship experiences. Retrospective questions about early attachment and upbringing.
38
39
hazen and shaver finding
Secure: 56% Avoidant: 25% Resistant: 19% Secure participants: Described their love experiences as trusting, happy, and long-lasting. They were more likely to believe in true love and lasting relationships. Avoidant participants: Were more doubtful about love, feared closeness and intimacy. Described love as unimportant or unlikely to last. Resistant participants: Were jealous, possessive, and had roller-coaster relationships. Worry about whether partners really love them.
40
internal working model affect on adult stuff
Proposed by John Bowlby. The first attachment relationship (usually with the mother) forms a template for future relationships. If the early attachment is secure, the child learns to trust and expect reliable, loving relationships. If the early attachment is insecure (avoidant or resistant), the child may struggle with intimacy, trust, or emotional regulation in adult relationships.