Bocciaro's study Flashcards
(45 cards)
What is a research paradigm?
a new method of testing to look at whistle blowing
What is a whistle blower?
Someone who makes public disclosure of corruption or wrong dooing
What was the aim of Bocchiaro’s study?
To see if disobedient participants and whistle blowers have different personality characteristics to those who obey
What is a pilot study?
a small-scale preliminary study designed to evaluate the feasibility of a full-scale study
What was the sample of Bocchiaro’s study?
149 undergraduate students
96 female, 53 male
average age =20.8
How did Bocchiaro obtain his sample?
He recruited by flyers in the campus cafeteria at the VU university in Amsterdam
They were given 5% course credit or 7 Euros
What are two strengths of Bocchiaro’s sample?
Big sample so allows a consistent effect to be show
Large range of students studying different courses
What is a weakness of Bocchiaro’s study?
Not representative of target population - 20.8 average age
What is a weakness of Bocchiaro’s sampling method?
may have felt obliged to take part so may have been more obedient in actual study
Outline the pilot tests of Bocchiaro’s study?
there were a series of 8 pilot tests
post experimental interviews revealed that participants believed the cover story and felt that the entire study was appropriate from an ethical standpoint
A total of 92 undergraduate students from the VU uni of Amsterdam participated in this preliminary research stage
What are the two strengths of researchers carrying out pilot studies?
Can make it more credible, more morally and ethically acceptable
It can also make it more standardised so that the authority figure would be the same to each participant
What are the two weaknesses of researchers carrying out pilot studies?
costly and time consuming
could end up with some if the same participants
What were the four hypotheses of Bocchiaro’s study?
A higher percentage of participants will obey the experimenter than in Milgram’s study
A lower level of whistle blowing than disobedience
A substantial overestimation of the tendency to disobey and blow the whistle
Weak effects for various personality variables
In Bocchiaro’s study, who met the participants and in what manner did they do this?
The researcher greeted the participant in a laboratory at the university, they were formally dressed and had a stern demeanor
What were participants asked to do after hearing the cover story?
Give the names of a few fellow students and convince them in s statement to take part in this study (without mentioning the negative effects
to fill in a research committee ethics form stating that this study is ethical
How long did the researcher leave the room for in Bocchiaro’s study?
7 minutes
What words were participants asked to use in their supportive statement in Bocchiaro’s study?
Exciting, great, incredible, superb
What were the two personality tests carried out in Bocchiaro’s study?
HEXACO-PI-R
social value orientation
What were the six dimensions of personality measured in the HEXACO-PI-R?
Honest-humility Emotionality Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Openness to experience
What were the three orientations that could emerge in the social value orientation test?
Pro-social
Individualistic’
competitive
What were the conclusions of Bocchiaro’s study?
The experiment casts doubt on the use of imagined scenario research. With people being so poor at accurately predicting their behaviour should such research ever be used?
Lends support to the better than average phenomenon (the idea that anyone believes themselves to be better than the average person on various attributes)
Situational pressures have a profound and powerful effect on individuals
What percentage of participants were obedient, disobedient or or whistle blowers (open and anonymous) in Bocchiaro’s study?
Obedient = 76.5% Disobedient = 14.1% Whistle blower = 9.4% Open whistle blower = 3.4% anonymous whistle blower = 6%
What percentage of participants said they would be obedient, disobedient or whistle blowers in Bocchiaro’s comparison study?
Obedient = 3.6% Disobedient = 31.9% Whistle-blower = 64.5%
What percentage of participants said they would be obedient, disobedient or whistle blowers in Bocchiaro’s comparison study?
Obedient = 18.8% Disobedient = 43.9% Whistle-blower = 37.3%