Moray's study Flashcards

1
Q

What is the cocktail party effect?

A

The ability to focus your attention on one stimulus while filtering out a range of other stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is dichotic listening?

A

The situation we two messages are presented simultaneously to an individual, with one message in each ear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is shadowing?

A

When two messages are played to an individual, one in each ear, and the person reads out one of the messages while ignoring the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an affective instruction?

A

A message given to a participant with their name in it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a non-affective instruction?

A

A message given to a participant without their name in it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the two overall aims of Moray’s study?

A

To rigorously test Cherry’s findings on attention

To investigate what types of message would penetrate an attentional block and be paid attention to be the participant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What apparatus was used in Moray’s study?

A

Brenell mark IV reel to reel tape recorder with twin output
headphones
recorded Passages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the background to Moray’s study?

A

To help fix problems faced by air traffic controllers at the time.
Cherry defined the cocktail party effect in 1953 and moray was brought in to help progress the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the sample used in experiment 1 of Moray’s study?

A

Undergraduate students and research workers of both genders at Oxford university

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the two conclusions of Experiment 1 in Moray’s study?

A

Participants are much more able to recognise words from the shadowed passage
Almost none of the words from the rejected message were able to break the inattentional barrier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the results of experiment 1 of Moray’s study?

A

shadowed passage words: 4.9/7
rejected passage words: 1.9/7
similar words in neither: 2.6/7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure of experiment 1 of Moray’s study?

A

Participants had to shadow a piece of prose that they could hear in one ear. In the other ear, a list of simple words was repeated 35 times. At the end of the task participants completed a recognition task where they were shown a list of 21 words; 7 from the shadowed message, 7 from the rejected message and 7 which were in neither but similar to those.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the aim of experiment 2 of Moray’s study?

A

To find out what could break through the inattentional barrier - to see if a message with a strong enough meaning to the participant would make the participant pay attention to the rejected message.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the sample of experiment 2 of Moray’s study?

A

12 students/ research workers from Oxford university.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the IV of Experiment 2 of Moray’s study?

A

Whether an instruction within a rejected passage;
was preceded by the participant’s name
wasn’t preceded by the participant’s name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the DV of experiment 2 of Moray’s study?

A

Whether participants were more likely to hear an instruction in a message they’re not paying attention to if it is preceded by their name

17
Q

How was the DV operationalised in experiment 2 of Moray’s study?

A

By whether the participants reported hearing the instruction or whether they followed the instruction.

18
Q

Summarise the passages in Experiment 2 of Moray’s study

A

Two passages of light fiction, both passages contained an instruction at the start and another one within them. Both were read by a steady monotone voice at a pace of about 130 words per minute by a single male voice.

19
Q

Outline what each participant did in the procedure of experiment 2 of Moray’s study

A

They each shadowed 10 passages of light fiction. They experienced the same passages in the same order. They were told that the aim was for them to make as few errors as possible in their shadowing of the passages.

20
Q

What was the conclusions of experiment 2 of Moray’s study?

A

Participants were far more likely to hear instructions that were affective than non-affective

21
Q

What were the results of experiment 2 in Moray’s study?

A

Affective instruction heard 20/39 of the times, non-affective 4/36

22
Q

What was the effect of being given a warning at the start of the passage to expect instructions to change ears?

A

There was a slight increase in the frequency of rejected passage heard

23
Q

What was the aim of experiment 3 of Moray’s study?

A

He wanted to find out the effect of the order of the instructions on identifying material within a rejected message

24
Q

Describe the sample used in Experiment 3 of Moray’s study

A

two groups of 14 participants - undergraduate students an research workers from oxford

25
Q

What was the IV of experiment 3 of Moray’s study?

A

group 1 were told they would be asked questions about shadowed messages
group 2 were told specifically to remember as many digits as possible from rejected message

26
Q

What was the DV of experiment 3 of Moray’s study?

A

The number of digits they heard in the rejected message

27
Q

What were the results of experiment 3 of Moray’s study?

A

The results showed no difference in the mean scores of digits recalled correctly between the two set-conditions

28
Q

What was the conclusion of experiment 3 of Moray’s study?

A

Numbers are not important enough to break through the block on the rejected message

29
Q

What was the procedure of experiment 3 of Moray’s study?

A

Participants were asked to shadow dichotic messages. Sometimes numbers were put into either the shadowed message or rejected message or both or neither. The two groups were told different things about how they would need to use this information (asked questions about shadowed message/ told specifically to remember as many digits as possible from rejected message)

30
Q

In what ways did Moray’s study uphold ethical guidelines?

A

Confidentiality
debrief
right to withdraw

31
Q

In what ways did Moray’s study break ethical guidelines?

A

Protection from harm

deception - therefore informed consent

32
Q

Does Moray’s study have external reliability?

A

Not really, there weren’t enough participants

33
Q

Does Moray’s study have internal reliability?

A

Yes because almost everything was totally standardised.

34
Q

Does Moray’s study have external (ecological) validity?

A

Not really, participants would not really have to experience those conditions in day to day life. However, it was based off real life experience (cocktail party - air traffic controllers)

35
Q

Does Moray’s study have external (population) validity?

A
We don't really know as we don't have much info about participants
They were from oxford so might be a class bias - intelligent - male bias?
36
Q

Does Moray’s study have internal validity?

A

Study did successfully measure the effect of types of message and whether they would penetrate an attention block and be paid attention to by participant, however there could have been demand characteristics

37
Q

Is Moray’s study ethnocentric?

A

It can only really be applied to the UK and English speaking cultures, however it is partially a biological study so could be applied to everyone - species specific

38
Q

What Were the four overall conclusions from Moray’s study?

A

1) In a situation where a subject directs his attention to the reception of a message from one ear, them rejects a message from the other ear, almost none of the verbal constant of the rejected message is remembered
2) A short list of simple words presented as the rejected message shows no trace of being remembered even when presented many times
3) Important messages can penetrate the attention block
4) it is very difficult to make neutral material important enough to break through the block set up in dichotic shadowing