C14) Voting Behaviour Flashcards

1
Q

what is psephology?

A

the study of elections & trends in voting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are long term/ social factors

A

refer to stable & usually unchanging differences between ppl, such as class, age, gender, ethnicity etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are short term factors?

A
  • volatile & changeable influences, such as rational decision making, reputations, the state of the economy, the media
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what classifications are w/c and m/c?

A
  • A & B- M/C
  • D & E - W/C
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what past evidence supports the notion of class alignment?

A
  • 1964:
  • lab- 64% of DEv
  • cons- 78% of ABv
  • peter pulzer - pol scientist- ‘class is the basis of british party politics; al else is embelllllishment & detail
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

wat are teh possible reasons behind class dealignment?

A
  • both maj Ps developed strong & deep roots within communities- culture for v for 1 P or other
  • selfish reasons- instrumental voting- voting for a P that beleive will do most for you eg lab policies to help w/c, cons thought to protect interests of m/c
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what evidence from recent elections shows that class alignment still exists?

A
  • 2017: lab 59% of DEv (up from 41% in 2015, 40% in 2010
  • bc of JC’s old lab ideas/ manifesto- to help w/c more & appeal
  • Ps still have a ‘core support’ from soc class bases- 2017 cons >10% ABv than lab, lab 9%>DEv than cons/ 2024 lab ahead in all classes but esp in ‘lower’ soc classes
  • advent of austerity= decline in incomes since 2008 crash- more class divisions & falling wages, dcrease in public services & impact & effect of Grenfel tower tragedy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what recent evidence supps notion o class dealignment?

A
  • 2019- lab 39% of DEv/ cons 41% DEv
  • 2024- lab 36% ABv, 34% DEv/ cons 27% ABv
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the possible reasons behind class dealignment?

A
  • ‘trad’ w/c- few working in heavy industry w harsh conditioins & a strong TU link, now >50% of workers in service industries- small units, relatively clean conditions, weal TU link& many women & parttime workers
  • so a ‘new’ w/c w increased standards of living \& increased home ownership- many C2 think of themselves as m/c or ‘aspiring’ w/c
  • ‘embourgeoisement’- adoption of m/c values & manners of groups trad w/c
  • so Ps, esp after 1980s, have policies centrist & consensual- appeal to a wider class base
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what recent evidence shows social class is no longer a predictable measure of voting behaviour?

A
  • lab 2017 evidence could be down to JC’s leadership
  • 2019 cons higher pop among all soc classes, incl w/c- positioned themselves as pro-brexit- maj of w/c vs shared desire to leave EU- so salient issues more ip
  • 2024 lab most pop in all- even A,B,C1- vs across soc held cons accountable for COLC & salient issue of ‘ec health’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

where was the traditional labour heartland?

A
  • north of eng- trad w/c- class alignment
  • ‘Red Wall’ of base supp
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how can the fall of lab’s ‘red wall’ at 2019 GE be explained?

A
  • many N const consdered w/c areas, were pro brexit, so supported Ts who they thought would ‘get brexit done’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does the fall of lab’s red wall show abt signif of voting behaviour & whether its predictable factor of v behav?

A
  • signif- clear geog pattern in way uk voted
  • but stances on brexit, the salient issue, were the real cause behind it
  • that n seats changed so quickly from lab to cons shows that region is not predictable factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is partisan alignment a significant long term factor in voting behaviour?

A
  • party loyalties historicaly strong- 1964- 48% ID strongly w a specific party, in 2019- 15%- partisan dealignment
  • declining membership of main Ps & decline in their vote share- 1970= 89%, 2024= 57%
  • has been cause dby class dealignment, better political educ, Ps producing similar policies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is rational choice theory?

A
  • idea that voters act like consumers and vote ofr party they beleive they’ll dervive most benefit from
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is salient issue/ issue voting?

A
  • part of rational choice theoru- idea that voters consider the salient issues most imp to themm when deciding how to vote/ judgement of Ps on this issue eg brexit or COLC
17
Q

what is instrumental voting?

A
  • part of rational choice- idea that rational voters will vote for the party they belive will bring them most benefit eg increasing their wages
18
Q

what is expressive voting?

A
  • part of RCT- idea that rational voters will v for which P they belive will bring most benefit to country as a whole, not just themselves eg best policy on environment
19
Q

what is positional voting?

A
  • part of RCT- idea that rational voters will vote for a P they believe shares their position/ perspective on salient issues
20
Q

valence voting

A
  • theory that voters decide who to vote for based on personal judgements of how far they trust the competing Ps to deliver ie to deliver effective leadership, deliver a strong ec, competent gov
21
Q

what are floating voters?

A
  • voters not strongly attatched to one P or another and can be persuaded to vote for any P; susceptible to infl of short-term factors on v behav
22
Q

what evidence suggests floating voters are on the rise/

A
  • stats on partisan dealignment eg 1964, 58% of vs said ID strongly w a party, 2019=15%
  • evidence shows 49% voters voted for dif parties across the 3 elections from 2010-17w
23
Q

what is ‘valence politics’?

A
  • known as competence voting; model of voting behav that emphasises that indivs vote based upon ppls judgements of the overall competence of the rival pol Ps
24
Q

what valence factors/ short term are there?

A
  • policies/ maifestos
  • conduct of campaigns
  • governing party competence
  • teh economy
25
arguements for opps winning GEs?
opps win: - battle of brands as gov runs out of ideas - lab against T's 'back to basics' slogan & trad values focus fails to produce visionary agenda, tb;s third way preffered by public - effective campaigns - win over media & so voters
26
arguements for governments losing GEs?
- imp of effectiveness of opps campaigns should not be exaggerated as tirig of Ps in gov & personalities in gov- largely predicted lab would win & callaghan remained the more popular leader - electorate known to punish failure & misconduct - opp winning the media- not always leaders eg callaghan more pop than MT, who was seen as condescending - gov's competence, handling of ec & ingteranal conflicts
27
how does age effect voting behav?
- every 10 years older u are, increased by 9% likeliness you'll vote tory - lab won 56% votes from 18-24 (21% T) - cons won 67% from 65+ (lab 14%) - younger ppl tend to be progressive & left-leaning - older- right wing & economically self-interested - so link to Ps, wholl offer for dif age groups, eg 2017 jc abolish tuition fees
28
how is ethnicity not v influential as a factor determining voting behav?
- explained as instrumental- BME vs tend to be from more w/c areas & white in affluent/ rural areas
29