Case study Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

What is the function of this building (ZCTC)

A

Research facility - into powering transport to accelerate disruptive propulsion solutions for heavy transport applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of frame did the building have (what were the main components)

A

Steel Frame
Columns, Beams and connections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the main design influences on the frame

A

Materials used, complexity of design, site constraints, sustainability targets etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How was the increased load accommodated in the design

A

Increased number of piles, and change from 2 pile caps to 3 pile caps in specific areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can you explain how the test cells were constructed

A

The test cells utilise a 100mm blockwork wall construction within the ground floor, no specific abnormal within this room (other than BMS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the key considerations of advising your client on a D&B route

A

I first assessed my clients key requirements, which was time and cost - the D&B route allows for design overlap (reducing overall programme) which was imperative for the grant spend deadlines, and an element of cost certainty. They also have a lot of experience with D&B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why was two stage tendering not considered

A

Due to budget constraints, we needed to ensure competition was driven into the process, and two stage tendering has a higher risk with price competition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was your advice around competitive procurement

A

Single stage tender will drive greater competition into the process, ensuring that all packages were 3-quoted to ensure VFM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was included in the tender docs?

A

Employer’s requirements, contract particulars, pricing documents, invitation to tender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was in the contract docs?

A

ER’s, CP’s, Contract, copy of ITT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did you advise your client on Open market contractor engagement?

A

I advised it would be opening-up for greater competition (at OH&P level which will be applied at an estimate level)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can you approach procurement to alleviate clients concerns about deviating from a framework contractor?

A

Ultimately, I cannot advise my client to stray away from their own procurement requirements, but I always endeavour to provide advise on all the available procurement routes and tendering strategy to ensure they can make an educated decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

You stated this was single sourced – how did you drive competition into this?

A

Ensuring that all packages were 3-quoted to ensure VFM, providing market testing where possible, and providing consultant level checks on all the package returns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did you analyse the tenders

A

Produce a tender report, which details the analysis undertaken, a comparison of the equalised submission, a rated score based on scoring mechanism defined in the ITT, and a recommendation for the preferred tenderer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

With hindsight, was there anything you would have changed about what you advised? With more time would you have done anything differently?

A

No, as the selected procurement route and strategy allowed for the project to start on site in time to drawdown against the first grant stream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

You mentioned early contractor engagement. What is a PCSA agreement and why would it be used?

A

Pre-Construction Services Agreement – allows for design activity prior to entering into contract (no obligation to enter into a contract)

17
Q

You have stated you advise your clients on value engineering. What is value engineering? Can costs increase when carrying out value engineering.

A

Systematic method to improve the value of something. Fundamentally, costs should not increase as the role of VE may be to improve the design, without detriment to the cost or vice-versa

18
Q

Difference between VM & VE

A

VM is the overall process of delivering optimum value from inception to completion
VE is a process specific to improving the balance of value of a particular element of a project

19
Q

Can you give me an example of the floor finishes you advised to be value engineered.

A

The test cells all had a polished screed, after further investigation, I suggested in a DTM that we collectively consider alternative solutions to improve costs; Painting straight to the concrete.

20
Q

What are employer’s requirements?

A

A detailed document outlining the client’s expectations for the project, including design, scope, and performance criteria.

21
Q

how did your approach to the Cost Plans differ from the early Order of Cost?

A

OfCE utilise higher level information, utilizing benchmark rates and GIFA’s to come to a measured works total, whereas a Cost Plan is broken down elementally with significant more design detail to build up a cost.

22
Q

Briefly what was the substantial design development in the MEP services to the tune of £0.5m?

A

Process heating and cooling requirements (provision of chillers and compressors) not previously highlighted as a requirement, driven by the research equipment

23
Q

How was the IT/AV budget reduced to achieve the saving?

A

VE Meeting, between client and key stakeholders – collectively rationalised the level of data points required

24
Q

You note your cost plan had design development contingency. What other risk allowances were included in the cost plan?

A

Construction Risk – included at 5%

25
What did you advise your client re design development contingency as you moved to the next phase of design.
I advised that it would be pragmatic to utilise the risk allowance, however not to fully drawdown against it due to only being between Stage 2/3. Agreed upon a 75% drawdown.
26
What is RIBA Stage 2
Concept Design
27
Who were the grant providers?
UKRPIF - UK Research Partnership Investment Fund EMF - East Midlands Freeport
28
Can you explain the external wall buildup of your project?
The external wall construction is rainscreen cladding over a blockwork cavity wall.
29
How did you future proof the void?
This was the role of the design team - Foundation capability was constructed for the full first floor (load requirements), Steelwork connections were left in to retrospectively adjust/connect