Ch. 10: Key Additional Notes and Capstone Flashcards
(34 cards)
What are the 4 key challenges of multiparty negotiations?
- Development and management of coalitions
- Complexity of information management
- Voting Rules
- Communication Breakdowns
__________ negotiations require all of the pie-slicing and pie-expanding skills of two-party negotiations.
Multiparty
What are the 5 different levels of analysis involved in multiparty negotiations?
- Coalition management
- Principle-agent relationships
- Team negotiation
- Intergroup negotiation
- Dealing with constituencies
__________ rule is time consuming, and it encourages group members to consider creative alternatives to expand the size of the pie.
Unanimity
(hard and challenging, but reaches more efficient outcomes than majority rule)
A result of group voting that demonstrates that the winners of majority rule elections change as a function of the order in which alternatives are voted upon
Condorcet paradox
(choosing where to eat with friends example)
T or F: In most principal-agent relationships, an agent’s authority is limited with respect to making concessions or agreements.
True
Negotiators who are accountable to constituents are (more/less) likely to make higher demands as compared to negotiators who are NOT accountable to a constituent.
more
________ ______ bias holds even when a new coalition structure forms that offers greater gain to members, coalition members often experience a strong pull to stay with their current coalition
Status quo
Multi-party negotiation is formed when a group of _______ or more individuals, each representing their own interests, attempts to resolve perceived differences of interest.
three
T or F: Coalition members compete with each other within the coalition itself during distribution of resources gained.
True
One of the benefits of using an agent is _________ _______.
emotional detachment
At some point conformity pressures increase with group size, peaking at about _______.
five (test question)
What theorem states that there is not a best way to derive a group’s preference from combining individual preferences?
Impossibility theorem
a group of two or more individuals who combine their resources to affect the decision outcome of a mixed-motive situation involving at least three parties.
coalition
One of the most effective strategies for enhancing coalitional effectiveness is to obtain _______ _________, as people often feel obligated to follow through with promises they make with others.
verbal commitments
When negotiators focus on reaching common ground with the other party and are reluctant to accept differences of interest, even when such acceptance might create options for joint gain.
agreement bias
In group negotiation, trade-offs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue, while receiving a concession from yet another group on a different issue.
circular logrolling
Represents peripheral player in a negotiation that is on the “same side” as a principle, but exerts independent influence on the outcome through their relationship with the principle.
constituent
A psychological bias in which agreement becomes more important than the contents of the agreement.
getting to yes bias
Unilateral conciliatory actions designed to de-escalate a conflict
GRIT model (also known as the graduated and reciprocal initiative in tension reduction model)
A theorem stating that the derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate if certain conditions prevail.
The impossibility theorem
Positive evaluations of one’s own group relative to an out-group
in-group bias
A voting principle providing that a majority (usually constituted by 50 percent plus one) of an organized group will have the power to make decisions binding on the whole group
majority rule
A negotiating strategy based on the principle that greater contact among members of diverse groups increases cooperation among group members.
mere contact strategy