Chapter 10 Flashcards
(11 cards)
Standard form of IBE (Inferences to the Best explanation) (4):
- Observation
- Explanation
- Comparison
- Conclusion
Inferences to the Best Explanation Definition:
Form of _______ argument.
Definition: A claim or hypothesis gains support if it enables us to explain something we cannot.
*Inductive
If Explanation can account for _________, this makes it ______
phenomenon, best.
Why if explanations can account for phenomena, it makes it good? (2)
- Justifies our belief in a conclusion via IBE (Derive explanation from observation. If x explains for something, then it is defeasible evidence for explanation to be true.)
- Compared to possible alternatives, or absence of explanations.
What does account for mean, in “Explanation can account for phenomena (IBE).” ? (2)
- Increase ability to understand observations or other knowledge.
- Increase ability to make reliable predictions.
Which Explanations are the best? Why Choose one over a competing alternative? Virtues of STRONG IBEs? (6)
- IBE needs to “actually” explain. (need to make sense and account for all relevant phenomena).
- Must be DEEP (shallow explanation raise more questions)
- Should be Powerful. (Wide range of explanations).
- Should be Modest (Modest conclusions are more easily supported, if explains too much, then trivial.)
- Ought to be simple (ideal of simplicity). (ease of understanding)
- Should be conservative (should not force us to give up beliefs).
IBEs can conflict and come in degrees (3): These axes of evaluation would help:
- must strike the right balance
- Determine ranking, strength of evidence needed
- Diff. contexts entail different standards of evidence.
To detmine whether IBE is “best: Compare & Contras axes: (3)
- fact that IBE is best does not mean it is true. (best among bad not that good)
- Object of explanation might be illusionary (not real).
- If defeaters are absent, then IBE is Strong, Inductive Argument.
Whether or not IVE is good explanation is a _________ affair, we test _________ against whole systems of belief, not ________.
-So what to give up and what to keep is not obvious.cn
holistic (a. Emphasizing the importance of the whole and the interdependence of its parts.), proposition, individually
Analogy arguments definition:
Conclusion drawn based on similarities between at least 2 things.
Ex. a, b, c all have E, Y : a , have , therefore c prob has Z.
Strengths of Analogy rests on:
- Number (variety): more analogies and variety increase strength.
- Similarities
- Relevance: Depend on background beliefs
- More modest hypothesis is stronger: weaker conc = stronger arg. (So people can’t criticize it).