Chapter 7 Flashcards

(18 cards)

0
Q

Parts of Proposition:

A

Subject & predicate (logical sense, not grammatical), quantity term, copula (tob be in present tense).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Categorical Propositions

A

Relation of inclusion/exclusion (whole or partial) between classes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quantity:

A

all, none, some (at least one)
Affirmative or negative
some=at least one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Standard form propositions: A E I O

A
A= universal affirmative
E= universal negative
I= Particular affirmative
O= Particular negative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Translating English into standard form:

A

Conditionals as A or E propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Venn Diagrams

A
  • Way to represent relations between classes: Left circle = subject, Right circle = Predicate
  • For universal propositions shaded out areas signify classes with no members (there is no “x”)
  • For particular propositions (I and O), an “x” signifies where there is at least one member (there is no shading).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Immediate inferences definition

A

Single premise arguments that are deductively invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Immediate Inferences:

A

-Modern Square of Opposition - Universal propositions on top, particular on bottom, propositions of same quality on same side.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contradiction (between A & O or Between E and I):

A

If one true, other false and vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conversion:

A

Switch subject for predicate - “I and E valid inference, otherwise not valid”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Existential Import definition:

A

Certain propositions assert the existence of an object (ex. some being equivalent to “there is at least one…”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Existential Import:

A

so: Interpret universal propositions to not have existential import - can refer to empty classes in this fashion.
- Particular propositions retain their existential import.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Categorical Syllogism definition:

A

Argument containing two premises and one conclusion: all premises and conclusion are categorical propositions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In a categorical proposition, there are …

A

3 terms, each used twice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 Terms in a categorical proposition: major, minor, middle

A

major term: is the predicate of the conclusion
minor term: subject of the conclusion
middle term: appearing only in the premises

Major premise is the premise where major term appears
Minor premise is the premise where minor term appears
Major premise is written first, the minor second.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To determine validity for categorical syllogisms, we use:

A

Venn Diagrams

16
Q

Venn Diagrams to determine validity of categorical syllogisms require:

A

Drawing three intersecting circles (S on left, P on right and M in the middle) - Diagram only the premises (if one premise is universal, then that is to be diagrammed first.

17
Q

Once you have diagrammed the premises for the Venn diagram, if the conclusion is thereby already unequivocally diagrammed across __ and __ circles, then argument is ____. Otherwise the argument is _____

A

S , P , Valid, Invalid.