Chapter 11 Slides Flashcards
(9 cards)
Systematic Reviews
The summation and assessment of multiple research studies found in the literature based on a clearly focused question or topic
- Meta-Analysis (Quantitative studies)
- Integrative Review (Quantitative and Qualitative)
- Meta-Summary (Qualitative studies)
- Meta-Synthesis (Qualitative studies)
Systematic Review Process
Uses explicit methods to :
1.) Identify & Select articles using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria
Critically appraise, & Analyze relevant data
2.) Assesses the strength and quality of the evidence provided by the chosen studies in relation to
Sampling issues
Internal validity
External validity
Data analysis
Meta Analysis
Systematic review using statistical techniques to assess and combine studies of the same design to obtain a precise estimate of the cause-and-effect relationship
Statistically analyzes and integrates the results of many studies
Provides Level I evidence, the highest level of evidence
Effect Size
Effect sizes are calculated using the difference in the averages scores between the intervention and control groups from each study.
Thus, the effect size is an estimate of how large of a difference there is between intervention and control groups in the summarized studies.
Integrative Review
Critical review of an area of research without a statistical analysis or a theory synthesis
Broadest category of review
Can include theoretical literature, research literature, or both
Can include both quantitative & qualitative research studies
PRISMA
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses)
Authors must include information of how they identified, screened, determined eligibility and inclusion for the articles used in their review
Cochrane Library
Largest repository of meta-analyses.
Cochrane Library is an international organization that prepares and maintains a body of systematic reviews that focus on health care interventions.
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Systematically developed statements or recommendations that link research and practice and serve as a guide for practitioners.
Developed by professional organizations, government agencies, institutions, or convened expert panels.
Provide clinicians with an algorithm for clinical management, or decision making for specific diseases.
Types of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Evidence-based practice guidelines are developed using a scientific process of grading the evidence.
Risk / Benefit
Quality of supporting evidence
Expert-based guidelines: agreement of a group of nationally known experts in the field
use opinions of experts along with whatever research evidence is developed to date.