Chapter 7 & 8 Slides Flashcards
(34 cards)
Elements not found in qualitative research
No hypothesis
No dependent and independent variables
No large, random samples
No complex statistical procedures
No scaled measurement tools
Contribution of qualitative research to practice
Can lead to development of measurement tools/ instruments (survey)
Creditability
Have the participants validated the themes? Do they recognize the experience as their own?
Auditability
Does the researcher document the research process?
Fittingness
Are the results meaningful to nursing?
Consider the study’s Trustworthiness
Measured by Rigor (creditability, auditability, fittingness)
Mimics the concept of Validity in Quantitative studies
Research Design
Provides the plan or blueprint for conducting the study
Is the strategy for systematically testing research questions or hypotheses
Provides the structure for maintaining the control in the study
True Experimental/Randomized control trial
There is an intervention
There is an experimental and control group
The participants were randomized
Quasi-Experimental
may not have an equivalent control group or may be not randomized, or both (but there is an intervention)
Non-Experimental (Descriptive or Correlational)
no intervention
Considerations in Quantitative Research Design
Objectivity of the research question or hypothesis
Is it framed within the
literature and theory?
Type of design chosen
Accuracy: Does it flow from the research question?
Feasibility: Can the question be answered by this design?
Control and Intervention fidelity
Validity: internal and external
Objectivity
The researcher can demonstrate objectivity of the research question or hypothesis by providing a thorough review of the literature and the identifying a theoretical framework in the article.
Design Accuracy
Accuracy of the research design is demonstrated if:
All aspects of the study design flow logically from the research question or hypothesis and offer the maximum amount of control
Design Feasibility
Can the question be answered with this design?
Assessment of the practicality of the study, consider:
Time
Participant availability
Facility and equipment
Money
Ethics
Designs Control
Steps taken by the researcher to
Avoid or decrease the effect of extraneous variables on the dependent variable or outcome
Keep the conditions of the study uniform
Avoids bias or threats to the internal validity of the study
Independent variable
influence the dependent variable (outcome)
- manipulated
Dependent variable
Variable the researcher is interested in explaining,
- Not manipulated
Extraneous Variables
Characteristics of the participants or conditions in the study that are not controlled
Compete with the independent variables as an explanation for a study’s outcome
Homogenous sample
Participants in the study have similar extraneous variables that might affect the dependent variable.
- Limits generalizability
- Increases application to similar population
Consistent Data Collection
Environmental conditions, timing of data collection, data-collection instruments, and data-collection procedures used to collect the data are the same for each subject.
Fidelity
Fidelity—trustworthiness or faithfulness
The researcher standardized the intervention and planned how to administer the intervention to each subject in the same manner under the same conditions.
Randomization
Random assignment of intervention
Each subject in the study has an equal chance of being assigned to the control group or the experimental group.
Validity
Internal validity: how well the study is conducted (structure)
External validity: how applicable the findings are to the real world
Internal validity
Adresses whether the independent variable really made the difference or the change in the dependent variable (the outcome)
Established by ruling out other factors or threats as rival explanations