CHAPTER 12: PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT METHODS Flashcards

(75 cards)

1
Q

It pertains to structured techniques of personality assessment that are typically administered using paper-and-pencil or computer formats. They contain short-answer items in which the examinee selects one response from two or more given options. These formats may include multiple-choice, true–false, or matching types. Scoring is conducted according to fixed procedures and involves little to no subjective judgment from the scorer.

A

Objective Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

It is a personality assessment technique in which individuals respond to unstructured or ambiguous stimuli (such as inkblots, pictures, or drawings). The assessee supplies structure to these stimuli, and the assessor interprets the responses to draw inferences about the individual’s personality. The method is indirect—assessees are not asked directly about themselves, which minimizes the ability to fake responses and reduces language and cultural barriers. It aims to reveal both conscious and unconscious aspects of personality.

A

Projective Methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

This posits that when presented with ambiguous stimuli, individuals project their own internal experiences, such as needs, fears, desires, and conflicts, onto the stimuli. Their responses reflect their unique ways of perceiving and responding, thereby revealing aspects of their personality.

A

Projective Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

It is a projective psychological assessment tool consisting of 10 bilaterally symmetrical inkblot cards. It lacks a built-in manual or standard administration and scoring system, leading to the development of several scoring systems over time. The most widely adopted and researched is Exner’s Comprehensive System.

A

Rorschach Inkblot Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who developed the Rorschach Inkblot Test?

A

Hermann Rorschach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The image or object that the test taker reports seeing in the inkblot.

A

Percept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The phase where the examiner asks for clarification on how/why responses were made.

A

Inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It refers to the optional structured questioning to further assess response potential.

A

Testing the Limits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A standardized approach developed by John Exner to unify administration, scoring, and interpretation of the Rorschach.

A

Comprehensive System

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

It refers to which part of the inkblot (whole, large, small, detail, white space) was used in forming the response

A

Location

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The feature(s) of the blot (e.g., shape, color, shading, movement) that caused the perception.

A

Determinants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The subject matter of the response (e.g., animals, humans, objects, anatomical parts, sexual imagery).

A

Content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Whether the response is commonly given by others for that particular blot (popular vs. rare responses).

A

Popularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How well the percept fits the actual inkblot (e.g., good form = close match, poor form = distorted or unrealistic match).

A

Form or Form Quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Projective test using story creation to assess motives, concerns, and worldview

A

Thematic Apperception Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who developed the TAT?

A

Henry A. Murray and Christiana D. Morgan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Perceiving current experience via past experiences

A

Apperception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Internal motivational force (e.g., need for love, success)

A

Need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Environmental factor influencing behavior (e.g., danger, support)

A

Press

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Recurring theme from the interaction of needs and press

A

Thema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Overt content in the image that suggests a certain type of story

A

Manifest Stimulus Demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Hidden, subtle cues that elicit deeper projection

A

Latent Stimulus Demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How structured/ambiguous the image is; influences story direction

A

Form Demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Common themes or storylines typically elicited by a card

A

Frequent Plots

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Deviations from common themes; potentially revealing
Significant Variations
26
Unconscious motivational influence revealed through stories
Implicit Motive
27
Developed by Erwin H. Wagner in 1983, is a projective psychological assessment designed to evaluate an individual’s interpersonal tendencies and behavioral patterns. It consists of nine cards, each depicting a picture of a hand, and a tenth blank card. The test-taker is asked to describe what the hands on each card might be doing. For the blank card, the individual is instructed to imagine a pair of hands and then describe their actions. Test-takers may provide multiple responses per card, and all responses are recorded. These responses are then interpreted based on 24 behavioral categories, including but not limited to affection, dependence, aggression, communication, and exhibition. The test aims to reveal underlying emotional functioning and personality characteristics through the projection of imagined hand actions.
Hand Test
28
It is a projective test, developed by Joseph Rosenzweig, that uses cartoon illustrations to depict various frustrating social situations. The test taker is instructed to fill in the dialogue or response of the character who is being frustrated in each cartoon. The underlying assumption is that the individual will psychologically identify with the person experiencing frustration, thus revealing aspects of their own personality and coping mechanisms. Versions of the test are tailored to different age groups—children respond orally, while adolescents and adults may respond orally or in writing. After all responses are collected, an inquiry period is often conducted to gain further clarification of the test taker's interpretations.
Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study
29
What are the three directions of aggression in the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study? ?: Directed inward ?: Directed outward ?: Avoided or deflected
Intropunitive: Directed inward Extrapunitive: Directed outward Inpunitive: Avoided or deflected
30
What are the three thematic categories for analyzing reactions in the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study? ?: Focus on the frustrating barrier itself ?: Emphasizing protection of the self ?: Focus on overcoming the frustrating problem
Obstacle dominance: Focus on the frustrating barrier itself Ego defense: Emphasizing protection of the self Need persistence: Focus on overcoming the frustrating problem
31
It is calculated to assess how closely a person’s responses align with those typical of the standardization group. While the test has inspired considerable interest and use in research, its validity in predicting real-life reactions to frustration remains a subject of debate.
Group Conformity Rating (GCR)
32
It was developed by Arthur A. Karp and colleagues in 1990, and was designed to improve upon the limitations of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) by incorporating greater objectivity in both content and scoring. The test consists of eight stimulus cards that depict identifiable people in realistic, everyday scenarios. These include diverse representations across age, gender, and minority status—an improvement over the TAT, which has been criticized for its often unrealistic or emotionally bleak imagery. One of the key distinctions of the test is its effort to evoke a wider range of affective responses by avoiding the gloomy tone commonly associated with TAT cards.
Apperceptive Personality Test (APT)
33
It may be defined as a semistructured, individually administered, projective technique of personality assessment that involves the presentation of a list of stimulus words, to each of which an assessee responds verbally or in writing with whatever comes immediately to mind first upon first exposure to the stimulus word.
Word Association Test
34
It is a task that may be used in personality assessment in which an assessee verbalizes the first word that comes to mind in response to a stimulus word.
Word Association
35
It refers to the technique of having subjects relate all their thoughts as they are occurring and is most frequently used in psychoanalysis; the only structure imposed is provided by the subjects themselves.
Free Association
36
It refers to a task in which the assessee is asked to finish an incomplete sentence or phrase.
Sentence Completion
37
It is a semistructured projective technique of personality assessment that involves the presentation of a list of words that begin a sentence, and the assessee’s task is to respond by finishing each sentence with whatever word or words come to mind.
Sentence Completion Test
38
(the part of the sentence completion item that is not blank, but must be created by the test taker) may be developed for use in specific types of settings (such as school or business) or for specific purposes.
Sentence Completion Stems
39
Skinner’s auditory projective device using indistinct speech sounds.
Verbal Summator
40
Renamed version of the verbal summator by Rosenzweig and Shakow.
Tautophone
41
Tests using sound as projective stimuli.
Auditory Projective Techniques
42
Subject responds to sounds by creating stories.
Auditory Apperception Test
43
A similar method developed by Wilmer & Husni (1951).
Auditory Sound Association Test
44
Murray’s test using spoken paragraphs, named after a Melville character.
Azzageddi Test
45
It is defined as a projective method of personality assessment whereby the assessee produces a drawing that is analyzed on the basis of its content and related variables.
Figure Drawing Test
46
A projective personality test where individuals are asked to draw a person, then a person of the opposite sex. It is used to assess self-concept, emotional functioning, interpersonal attitudes, and underlying conflicts. The drawings are thought to reflect aspects of the individual’s personality, psychological state, and self-perception.
Draw-A-Person (DAP) Test
47
This test asks individuals to draw a house, a tree, and a person, each symbolizing different aspects of the self, used to explore emotional disturbances, personality structure, and coping patterns, particularly in children and adolescents.
House-Tree-Person (HTP) Test
48
In this test, the examinee (typically a child) is asked to draw their family members “doing something”. The drawing reveals perceived family dynamics, emotional roles, and interpersonal tensions within the family system.
Kinetic Family Drawing (KFD)
49
An adaptation of KFD designed for school settings. The examinee draws themselves and others doing something in school. Useful for assessing peer relationships, teacher-student dynamics, and attitudes toward school.
Kinetic School Drawing (KSD)
50
A combination of KFD and KSD designed to evaluate the individual’s behavior and emotional functioning across home and school contexts. It allows for a more integrated understanding of functioning across environments.
Kinetic Drawing System (KDS)
51
Used primarily in family therapy settings, this technique asks family members to draw together on a single picture. It evaluates communication, cooperation, boundary issues, and power dynamics within the family.
Collaborative Drawing Technique
52
It is a psychological evaluation approach that focuses on directly observing and measuring an individual’s behavior within specific contexts, emphasizing what a person does rather than inferring underlying traits or psychological constructs. Unlike traditional "sign" approaches that interpret behavior as clues to internal states, the behavioral method uses a "sample" approach, viewing behaviors themselves as meaningful samples of functioning. It centers on identifying antecedents, consequences, and patterns of behavior to guide intervention strategies, with an emphasis on empirical observation, situational variables, and ongoing assessment throughout therapy.
Behavioral Assessment Method
53
A retrospective method where individuals recall and report behavior (e.g., alcohol use) over a defined calendar period.
Timeline Followback (TLFB)
54
Real-time data collection using handheld devices or mobile apps. Allows in-the-moment recording of behaviors like smoking or drinking. Effective for studying the immediate antecedents of behavior in natural settings.
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
55
This technique involves watching the activities of targeted clients or research subjects and, typically, maintaining some kind of record of those activities.
Behavioral Observation
56
A preprinted sheet on which the observer notes the presence or intensity of targeted behaviors, usually by checking boxes or filling in coded terms.
Behavior Rating Scale
57
Tools designed to measure a wide variety of behaviors or abilities across different domains.
Broad-band Instruments
58
Tools designed to measure specific behaviors or abilities related to a single, focused construct.
Narrow-band Instruments
59
It is the act of systematically observing and recording aspects of one’s own behavior and/or events related to that behavior.
Self-monitoring
60
It refers to the possible changes in an assessee’s behavior, thinking, or performance that may arise in response to being observed, assessed, or evaluated.
Reactivity
61
It is a research investigation in which one or more variables are similar or analogous to the real variable that the investigator wishes to examine.
Analogue Study
62
A process to convey the process of identifying the dependent and independent variables with respect to the presenting problem.
Functional Analysis of Behavior
63
It is a procedure that allows for observation and evaluation of an individual under a standard set of circumstances.
Situational Performance Measure
64
It is a situational assessment procedure wherein several people are organized into a group for the purpose of carrying out a task, as an observer records information related to individual group members’ initiative, cooperation, leadership, and related variables.
Leaderless Group Technique
65
It is an improvised or partially improvised part in a simulated situation, and can be used in teaching, therapy, and assessment.
Role Play (or acting)
66
These are techniques that assess physiological responses (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure) influenced by psychological factors.
Psychophysiological Methods
67
A method that monitors and provides feedback on physiological processes (e.g., pulse, muscle tone, brain waves) to help individuals gain control over them.
Biofeedback
68
It is a biofeedback instrument that records changes in the volume of a part of the body arising from variations in blood supply.
Plethysmograph
69
A tool that measures blood flow to the penis to assess sexual arousal patterns, especially in sexual offender assessments.
Penile Plethysmograph (Phallometric Testing)
70
These are used to assess sexual arousal patterns in offenders. This data can encourage offenders to be more honest about their behaviors, and help evaluate progress in treatment by measuring changes in arousal responses to normal vs. deviant stimuli.
Phallometric Data
71
A device that records physiological changes (e.g., respiration, skin response, heart rate) to assess truthfulness during questioning.
Polygraph (Lie Detector)
72
It is a telling physical trace or record. These are nonreactive methods of assessment that do not require direct interaction with or awareness from the subject. They involve observing physical traces or indirect evidence of behavior (e.g., worn floors, trash contents, or photographs) to gather data without influencing the behavior being studied.
Unobtrusive Measures
73
It refers to the averaging of multiple observers’ ratings to reduce individual biases or errors. This technique helps increase inter-rater reliability and minimizes the impact of any single rater’s subjectivity or error.
Composite Judgment
74
It is a type of rating error in behavioral assessment. It occurs when the evaluation of one behavior is influenced by the evaluation of a previous behavior, leading to a rating that is either more favorable or unfavorable than it should be.
Contrast Effect
75
It occurs when an observer’s subjective views, expectations, or prior knowledge influence how they perceive, interpret, or record the behavior they are observing.
Observer Bias