Chapter 2 Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Prefrontal Lobotomy

A

Surgical procedure that severs fibres connecting the frontal lobes of the brain from the thalamus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Heuristic

A

A mental shortcut, Rule of Thumb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Naturalistic Observation

A

Watching behaviour in real-world settings without trying to manipulate people’s behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Internal Validity

A

The extent to which we can draw cause-and-effect inferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

External Validity

A

The extent to which we can generalize findings to real-world settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case Study

A

Researchers examine one person or a small number of people, oftenover an extended period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Existence Proofs

A

Demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Random Selection

A

Every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reliability

A

Consistency of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Validity

A

Extent to which a measure assesses what it claims to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Correlational Design

A

Examine the extent to which two variables are associated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Illusory Correlation

A

The perception of a statistical association between two variables where none exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Experiment

A

Research design characterized with random assignment of participants to conditions and manipulation of an IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Random Assignment

A

Randomly sorting participants into groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Exprimental Group

A

The group of participants in an experiment that receives manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Control Group

A

The group of participants in an experiment that doesn’t receive manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Operational Definition

A

A working definition of what a researcher is measuring

18
Q

Placebo

A

Improvement resulting from the mere expectation of improvement

19
Q

Blind

A

Unaware of whether one is in the experimental or control group

20
Q

Experimenter Expectancy Effect

A

Phenomenon where researchers’ hypotheses lead them to unintentionally bias theoutcome of a study

21
Q

Double-Blind

A

Neither researchers nor participants are aware of who’s in the experimental or control group

22
Q

Demand Characteristics

A

Cues that participants pick up that allow them to generate a guess on the researcher’s hypothesis

23
Q

Informed Consent

A

Informing research participants of what is involved in a study before asking them to participate

24
Q

Central Tendency

A

Measure of the central scores in a data set

25
Mean
Average
26
Median
Middle score in a data set
27
Mode
Most frequent score
28
Variability
How loosely or tightly bunched scores are
29
Range
Difference between the highest and lowest scores
30
Standard Deviation
Measure of variability that takes into account how far each data point is from the mean
31
Inferential Statistics
Methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalize findings from our sample to the full population
32
Base Rate
How common a characteristic or behaviour is in the general population
33
Naturalistic Observation
high in external validity
34
Naturalistic Observation
low in internal validity. Doesn't allow us to infer causation
35
case studies
can provide existence proofs. Allows us to study rare or unusual phenomena. Can offer insights for later systemic testing
36
case studies
are typically anecdotal. Don't allow us to infer causation
37
Correlational Design
can help us to predict behavious
38
Correlational Design
don't allow us to infer causation
39
experimental designs
allow us to infer causation. High in internal validity
40
experimental designs
can sometimes be low in external validity