Chapter 8 Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

The ability to manipulate the IV, control the extraneous variables and affect the DV

A

experimental control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

More experimental control means we can.

A
  1. Establish temporal order
  2. Remove plausible alternative explanations
  3. Create covariation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A factor that is not the focus of the experiment, but can affect the results if not controlled

A

extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A variable that can affect the temporal order or change the DV that is not the IV

A

confounding variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When an experiment consistently alters their behaviour towards participants depending on what condition the participant is in

A

systemic bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Different participants are randomly assigned to each condition

A

between-subject design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Each participant engages with more then one condition

A

within-subject design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Changing the order of conditions that participants participate in

A

counterbalancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Experiment with only one IV, but the IV must have two levels (conditions)

A

single-factor design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The group that gets the change or active level of the IV

A

experimental condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The group that does not receive treatment

A

control condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Advantages of between-subjects design

A
  1. the results are only caused by the condition they are in
  2. Some questions only work in a between-subject design
  3. it’s harder for participants to guess the hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

disadvantages of between-subjects designs

A
  1. not always effective in creating equivalent groups
  2. need more participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A type of between-subject design where participants are randomly assigned to various conditions of the experiment

A

independent-groups design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The conditions are randomly assigned at every level and every possible point

A

Block randomization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A characteristic on which we match sets of individuals as closely as possible

A

matching variable

17
Q

A set of participants is matched based on attributes and then is randomly assigned to conditions

A

matched-groups designs

18
Q

Selecting participants and groups based on personal characteristics

A

natural-groups design

19
Q

A personal characteristic that we want to study

A

subject variable

20
Q

A procedure in which each member of a poluation has an equal probablitity of being selected into the sample

A

random sampling

21
Q

participants are randomly selected to a condition and has an equal probablility of being in any condition

A

random assignment

21
Q

participants are randomly selected to a condition and has an equal probablility of being in any condition

A

random assignment

22
Q

Advantages of within-subject designs

A
  1. fewer participants
    2.Good for experiments with many condtions
  2. Collect more data per conditition
    4.More reliable findings
  3. Can only be used for certain types of questions
23
Q

Disadvantages of within-subject designs

A
  1. Order effects and progressive effects
  2. practice effects
  3. fatigue effect
  4. carryover effects
24
Disadvantages of within-subject designs
1. Order effects and progressive effects 2. practice effects 3. fatigue effect 4. carryover effects
25
Participants responses are effected by the order of conditions
order effects
26
Refelcts changes in participants responses due to exposure to prior conditions
progressive effects
27
When imporvement comes from doing the ask multiple times
practice effects
28
Participants responses in one condition are uniquely influenced by another particular condition
carryover effects
29
exposure to multiple conditions increases participants awarenss of hypothesis
sensitization
30
Exposing participants to each condition once in all possible orders
complete counterbalancing
31
A type of counterbalancing that can only be done with multiples of 4 numbers where each condition only appears once in each collum and row
latin square
32
From the set of all possible orders, a subset of orders is randomly selected and each order is administered to one participant
random-selected-orders design
33
Why expose participants to each condition more than once?
1. a smaller amount of participants 2. examine reliability of participant responses 3. extend generalizability of results
34
Every participant is exposed to multiple blocks of trials with each block for each participant containing a newly randomized order of all the conditions
block-randomization design
35
Each participant receives a random order of all the conditions and then receives a random order of all the conditions and then receives them again in the reverse order.
reverse-counterbalancing design
36
Help researchers determine whether the differences between the mean scores of two conditions is significantly significant
T-test
37
Help researchers determine whether the overall pattern of differences among the mean scores of the conditions is statistically significant
ANOVA