Chapter 8 Flashcards
(38 cards)
The ability to manipulate the IV, control the extraneous variables and affect the DV
experimental control
More experimental control means we can.
- Establish temporal order
- Remove plausible alternative explanations
- Create covariation
A factor that is not the focus of the experiment, but can affect the results if not controlled
extraneous variables
A variable that can affect the temporal order or change the DV that is not the IV
confounding variable
When an experiment consistently alters their behaviour towards participants depending on what condition the participant is in
systemic bias
Different participants are randomly assigned to each condition
between-subject design
Each participant engages with more then one condition
within-subject design
Changing the order of conditions that participants participate in
counterbalancing
Experiment with only one IV, but the IV must have two levels (conditions)
single-factor design
The group that gets the change or active level of the IV
experimental condition
The group that does not receive treatment
control condition
Advantages of between-subjects design
- the results are only caused by the condition they are in
- Some questions only work in a between-subject design
- it’s harder for participants to guess the hypothesis
disadvantages of between-subjects designs
- not always effective in creating equivalent groups
- need more participants
A type of between-subject design where participants are randomly assigned to various conditions of the experiment
independent-groups design
The conditions are randomly assigned at every level and every possible point
Block randomization
A characteristic on which we match sets of individuals as closely as possible
matching variable
A set of participants is matched based on attributes and then is randomly assigned to conditions
matched-groups designs
Selecting participants and groups based on personal characteristics
natural-groups design
A personal characteristic that we want to study
subject variable
A procedure in which each member of a poluation has an equal probablitity of being selected into the sample
random sampling
participants are randomly selected to a condition and has an equal probablility of being in any condition
random assignment
participants are randomly selected to a condition and has an equal probablility of being in any condition
random assignment
Advantages of within-subject designs
- fewer participants
2.Good for experiments with many condtions - Collect more data per conditition
4.More reliable findings - Can only be used for certain types of questions
Disadvantages of within-subject designs
- Order effects and progressive effects
- practice effects
- fatigue effect
- carryover effects