Class 4 Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

In general, qual design is:

A

•Flexible: Adjusting to new information during the course of data collection
•Holistic: Understanding of the whole
Triangulating: Merging of various data collection strategies
•Immersing: Researchers become intensely involved
•Iterative: Data analysis is ongoing to formulate subsequent strategies and to determine
when data collection is done

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Design: Time

A

Cross sectional: Snapshot in time
Longitudinal: Multiple data collection points over time to observe the evolution of some
phenomenon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Methods (examples)

A

Participant observation: A method of collecting data through the participation in and observation of a group or culture

In depth Interviews: Key informants: Persons knowledgeable about a focal phenomenon and who are willing to share information and insights with the researcher

Focus group discussions: An interview with a small group assembled to provide feedback on a given topic, usually guided by a moderator using a semi structured topic guide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Traditions

A

ethnography,
phenomenology,
grounded theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethnography: a branch of

A

anthropology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Perspectives: emic or etic

A
emic, from within the social group (from the perspective of the subject) and etic,
from outside (from the perspective of the observer).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ethnography

A

understand how people live their lives, tacit knowledge about culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Phenomenology: roots in

A

psych

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Phenomenology

A

understand people’s everyday life experiences, essence that can be understood, style of thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 main schools of thought in phenomenology

A

descriptive and interpretive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Grounded Theory: roots in

A

sociology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Grounded Theory:

A

the construction of theory through methodic gathering and analysis of data. involved. seek to understand actions by
focusing on the main concern or problem that the individuals’ behavior is designed to address. conceptual categories. Data collection, data analysis, and sampling of participants occur simultaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Critical approaches

A

critical theory, feminist research, PAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

critical theory

A

An approach to viewing the world that involves a critique of society, with the the goal of envisioning new possibilities and effecting social change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

feminist research

A

Research that seeks to understand, typically through qualitative approaches, how gender and a gendered social order shape women’s lives and their consciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PAR

A

A research approach based on the premise that the use and production of knowledge can be political and used to exert power

17
Q

Selection methods:

A

Convenience sampling
Snowball sampling
Purposive sampling

18
Q

Maximum variation sampling

A

Most widely used method of purposive sampling. It involves purposefully selecting persons (or settings) with
variation on dimensions of interest.

19
Q

Homogeneous sampling

A

Deliberately reduces variation and permits a more focused inquiry.

20
Q

Extreme (deviant) case sampling

A

opportunities for learning from the most unusual and extreme informants cases that at least on the surface
seem like “exceptions to the rule” (e.g., outstanding successes and notable failures).

21
Q

Intensity sampling

A

Information rich cases that manifest the phenomenon of interest intensely but not as extreme or potentially
distorting manifestations: to select rich cases that offer strong examples of the phenomenon.

22
Q

Reputational case sampling

A

cases recommended by an expert or key informant. Useful when researchers have little information about
how best to proceed with sampling and must rely on recommendations from others.

23
Q

Critical case sampling

A

Selecting important cases regarding the phenomenon of interest. With this approach, researchers look for the particularly good story that illuminates critical aspects of the phenomenon and then intensely explore that story.

24
Q

Criterion sampling

A

Selecting cases that meet a predetermined criterion of importance.

25
Revelatory case sampling
Identifying and gaining access to a single case representing a phenomenon that was previously inaccessible to research scrutiny.
26
Opportunistic sampling
Adding new cases to a sample based on changes in research circumstances as data are being collected, or in response to new leads and opportunities that may develop in the field.
27
Disconfirming cases
Examples that do not fit and serve to challenge researchers’ interpretations. These negative cases may simply be “exceptions that prove the rule,” but they may be exceptions that disconfirm earlier insights and suggest rival explanations about the phenomenon.
28
Theoretical or theory | based sampling
grounded theory. “the process of data collection for generating theory whereby the analyst jointly collects, codes, and analyzes his data and decides what data to collect next and where to find them, in order to develop his theory as it emerges”
29
Data saturation
Sampling to the point at which no new information is obtained and redundancy is achieved.
30
sample size, can be affected by
the purpose of the inquiry, the quality of the informants, and the type of sampling strategy used.
31
data saturation - problematic
can't critique an article based on the number. have to see how they decided that it was a sufficient sample.