Conformity, compliance and obedience Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

what are conformity, compliance and obedience classed as

A

3 forms of social influence that vary in degree of pressure exerted on individual

  • less pressure in conformity and most in obedience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is conformity

A

The tendency to change our perceptions, opinions or behaviour in ways that are consistent with group norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is majority v minority influence

A

2 types of influence

majority; majority change minority

minority; minority change majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the Asch study? 1951

A

line conformity study; found that even with an obvious answers S would agree w group even if the group was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain the conditions in the study

A

control; 7pp in group of 7 gave answers individually and aloud across 18 trials

unanimous condition; 1 pp and 6 confederates. 6 confederates gave correct answers during 6 trials and same incorrect answer during 12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did Asch find

A

control condition; no-one made any mistakes across 18 trials

experimental condition; 35% were wrong answers due to conforming to majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is informational influence and what does it lead to

A

change of beliefs that occur when a person privately accepts the position of others, leads ti private conformity

e.g they are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is normative influence and what does it lead to

A

superficial change in overt behaviour, with no corresponding change of opinion, produced by real or imagined group pressure; lead to public conformity

e.g they are wrong but I don’t want to disagree with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why do people conform

A

informational influence; desire to be right

normative; fear consequence of rejection that follows deviance e.g desire of acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was asch study an example of

A

normative infleunce

  • no-one got it wrong when did task individually. they conformed with everyone else even if they knew it was wrong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what of the two influences is more powerful

A

informational (private)

  • opinions likely to remain same when others are absent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in aschs study what was the support condition

A

6 confederates gave correct answers during 6 trials. during remaining 12 trials, 5 confederates gave the same incorrect answer 1 but the 6th confederate gave the correct answer 2. when one gies right answer, pp gave right answer (only 2% gave wrong)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what about the deviate condition

A

during the 12 trials, 5 conned gave incorrect answer 1 and 6th gave incorrect answer 3. only 10% of pp gave the wrong answer. less pressure due to support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

incorrect majority can infleuence minority as long as what

A

majority are unanimous in opinion. ALL say the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were the implications of Asch

A

voting pattern on US supreme court

  • 35% of decisions are 9 v 0 . 8 v 1 only 10%. unlikely to be used
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what did moscivici say about minority influence

A

minority influence is effective as long as there is consistency over time.

between diff people and within a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what was moscivici study 1976

A

pp saw 36 slides, all blue

control; 6 pp gave answers individually

consistent minority; 2 confer and 4 pp. confer say green 36 times

inconsistent minority; 2 conned say green 24 times and blue 12 times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what did they find

A

control; no wrong answer

inconsistent; 1% incorrect answer given

consistent; 8% gave wrong asnwers

consistency causes it

19
Q

Nemeth 1982 studied minority influence

A

pp saw 36 blue slides all diff intensity

control; all said correct

pattern minority; 2 confed and 4 pp. confed said green blue 18 times to darker and green 18 times to lighter

no pattern minority, said 18 and 18 randomly

20
Q

what were the findings

A

control and no pattern had no effect. pattern caused 21% to say wrong answers.

patterns influence answers

21
Q

what factors influence minority influence

A
  • personal benifit; influenced when benefit of giving wrong answer
  • uncertainty; more uncertainty of right answer causes more conformity to majority
  • likeability; the more they like the minority, the more likely to be influenced
  • snowball effect; one will start getting along with minority. cause other to follow
22
Q

Snowball effect

A

one small event can make proceeding events seem more damaging than they actually are

e.g suffragettes

23
Q

conformity and culture- explain

A

individualistic; autonomy and interdependence are valued eg us and uk

collectivist; harmony and fitting in are valued e.g china and Colombia

24
Q

where are conformity rates higher

A

collectivist cultures

pakistan, peru etc

25
what is compliance
changes in behaviour that are elicited by direct request
26
what is disrupting mindlessness
making an unusual request that triggers a persons interest e.g saying the 3 pounds is 300 pennies. sounds better
27
what is the norm of reciprocity
treating others as they have treated us
28
what is Regans study
confederate took a call in front of pp in either pleasant or rude way. he then left and bought back two cokes (for himself and pp) or nothing. he then asked pp to buy raffle tickets. - more tickets bought when given a coke.
29
what is the foot in the door theory - cialdini 2009
make people comply with a small initial request. they are more likely to comply with a second, bigger request e.g freedman and fraser study; control; can I asked to come to ur house and check household products. 22% compliance. experimental; can I ask questions about products. then 3 days later ask to go over 53% compliance
30
what is lowballing
obtaining an agreement and then raising request e.g control; do u want to take part in my study at 7am 31% agree. experimental; do u want to take part? after agreeing tell them the time 56% agree
31
what is the door in the face
making a large initial request that will be rejected followed by a reasonable request . work through reciprocal concession (both parities compromise) e.g control; can u go on zoo trip with kids 17% agree exp; do u want to work with juveniles. then do u want to go zoo 50% agree
32
what is the that's not all technique
start with an inflated request then decrease the size offering a discount e.g customers approached with cupcakes to buy. control; 75 cents 44% purchased. exp; price reduced from 1 to 75cents 73% purchased
33
what is obedience
behaviour change produced by commands of authority
34
explain Milgrams study of obedience 1965
study the effects of shocks on memory. in ap air the pp was always teacher and confed always learner. learner put on electric chair where the teacher experienced 45v of shock . the teacher could hear the learner and the task increased the shock 15v every time they gave incorrect response. they encouraged the pp with you must continue, essential to continue etc.
35
what did Milgram find
the learner began to grunt at 75v and screaming by 300 v. people believed people would go to 300 volts. all went to 120v. 80% to 280v. 62% went to 450v
36
situation factors influence obedience 1. proximity of victim
when they could see the victim, 40% gave 450v whereas when only hearing 62% did
37
authority of experimenter
when the experimenter was in the room, 62% went to 420 v. when on the phone, only 20% went to 450v same as with no experimenter
38
peer pressure
teacher had helped (confed) who refused to continue. when there was no helper, 62% went to 450v. a disobeying helper only 10% and an obeying helper, 90%.
39
what is fundamental attribution error
under estimation of situational factors on behaviour
40
burger repeated milgram experiment
max voltage was only 150v due to ethics. 82% went to 150 on milligrams. only 70% on burger
41
when dolinski repeated to 450 v what did he find
milgram -82% and dolinski- 90%
42
what is Latane social impact theory
strength of source; authoritative source has more impact immediacy; closer the source is to target, the stronger the impact number; as number of sources increases, the impact increases to a point
43
why do people resist social pressure
if target us strong and far from source if target accompanied by others
44