different electoral systems Flashcards
(81 cards)
what is voter choice
how much choice is given to a voter
how many votes they ger and how many candidates or parties they can vote for
is their vote wasted
what are two things to consider when weighing how representative a voting systsem is
what are the votes vs outcome is there a close correlation
what is the constituency link like
what is fptp
-single vote cast by constituent for their constituency. there are 650 constituencies so 650 mps will be voted
-it causes a SIMPLE PLURALITY SYSTEM, where the candidate wins the largest amount of votes to win, does not have to be majority
-re-elected every 5 y
for a maj gov u need 326mps
what is a simple plurality system?
where the candidate wins the largest amount of votes to win, does not have to be majority
what are some advantages of fptp
-simple system to understand as voters cast one vote, ams referendum was rejected with low turnout 42% 68% no
-it is quick 1997 blair was elected under 24h and ams in scotland takes 2weeks to find out gov
-leads to a strong singular gov and clear 2 party system, so the party who wins has a strong mandate to carry out manifesto, and most gov have maj vote so they have more legitimacy
> like thatcher quick economic policies or blair constitutional reforms like hra
clear alternative forces voters to face a fundamental choice, especially when it comes to single issue politics. in 2019 the main issue was brexit and many cast votes on that
-excludes extremist parties making it hard for them to win seats since you need concentrated geographical support : like reform uk got 4m votes but 5 seats, ukip 10% but small seats
-there is a strong mp constituency link
ex: lizz truss ban on fracking was met with 33 mp rebelling due to their constituencies
what are some disadvantages of fptp?
-not proportionate ex reform uk won 5 seats with 4m of vote and 14% vote share but libdems won 72 with 12% a largely unfair disparity in seats even though in percentage it is trandlated fairly for libdems. in oakland and shetley they need 10k to win a seat in isle of wight they need 41k
-fptp discriminates against smaller parties creating a democratic deficit and wasted votes. this forces tactical voting so parliament is not representative. ex in 2015 libdems won 12% of vote and 2% of seats or UKIP won 13% of vote and one seat. in 2019 32 % of voters voted tactically
-votes are of different value due to different constituency sizes making it unfair.
what is an evaluating argument against fptp?
innefective as it does not always lead storng single gov with high legitmacy or strong mandates. 2010 coalition is proof of this, and 2017 gov had small legitimacy and a weak mandate. may’s gov caused a weak brexit deal with a SC rule against her as she had a weak mandate and small majority to see brexit through. FPTP can be seen to have survived due to its history of working and benefiting large parties. this can be seen in 2022 where lab voted to introduce a new proportional system but in 2024 when they were voted in they abandoned this system completely. it also has pupblic support due to simplicity ex av ref 2011
what was the AV referendum
2011
42% turnout
68% said no
what is ams
used in scottish parliament elections, welsh assembly and greater london assembly
you get 2 votes one for yur fptp constituency and one top up for a party
how does the second vote in AMS work
meant to correct the fptp system using the dhont formula giving parties that are underrepresented more representation in a list vote/top up member.
in Scotland 76 constituency members are voted and 56 list members
what are some advantages of ams?
-top up members introduce an element of proportionality and corrects disproporionality of fptp
ex: 199 cons won 0 constituency seats but had 18 top up members correcting the fptp disadvantage
-constituency element ensures strong mp constituency link remains which is important for electorate representation in parliament
-less liekly to waste votes as you have a wider voter choice with two votes for a party and constituent mp
ex: greens won 1% of consittuent vote and 8% of top up and had 8 members through top up. this also shows a close correlation between votes and seats
-coalition govs can be strong in governing
ex scot raised income tax by 2% so they do have effective governing to pass new policies
what are some disadvantages of ams?
creates 2 different types of members. one has an mp constituency link whereas one doesn’t, however there’s no evidence to prove that the top up has less legitimacy
-close party list for second vote this means voters do not know who they are voting for and the party chooses the candidate themselves. this disengages voter influence and preference as the [party leadership chooses the mp. this could cause underrepresentation in parliament. however, many voters in fptp do not know their candidate and vote rather for the party policies they embody not personal values so this is not alwyas evidence of ams being undemocratic.
-ams can lead to weak minority and coalition governments which make policy passing and governing competancy limited. this is counterproductive and can be seen as a major issue amongst people who want to adress constituency issues or national issues like scottish 2nd referendum for european membership as a single state. so far 3 scot gov have bee coalition, 2 minority and one majority
so overall, what does AMS do?
- corrects fptp underrepresentation with a close correlation of vote share and seat share, in the top up list element. it maintains constituency element while being proportional, it is not radical change like STV as it barely results in an overwhelming majority gov (? is this true )
what’s an issue with safe seat voters
happens in fptp in uk this means in safe seats voters do not have a choice in who will win as it is overwhelmingly obvious a lot of the time. however this can be seen as a weak argument due to red wall collpasing in 2019 with BJ.
how is the mayor of london voted
usually through SV but from 2024 itll be fptp
what is STV?
used in NI assembly and Scottish councils
creates multi member constituencies
voters rank choices preferentially and in roder for a candidate to be selected they have to meet a qouta which is calculated by the droop formula which is number of votes/ number of seats plus one. first preference votes are counted. if a candidate meets the qouta their surplus votes are transferred to second preferences. if no one meets the qouta then the candidate with the fewest votes is elimanted and redistributed. this is repeated until all seats filled.
what are some advantages of STV
- it is highly proportionate due to the close correlation between votes and seats, less wasted votes
-voter choice is high as they can rank candidates from the same and different parties
what are some disadvantage of STV?
in large constituencies the mp consituency link is weak
- it is a long complex process to count and results take a while to come out and it is long for the voter to rank they may give up
what is sv?
-used in london mayor election and police and crime
voters mark 1,2 choice and if the first gets over 50% automatically elected but if not then all but 2 get eleminated and their second prefrence votes are reallocated to the top two. whoever had the most after redistribution wins.
what are some advantages of SV?
-ensures broad support for the winner so they have the largest personal mandate of all candidates.
-it is simple and does not waste votes
what are some disadvantages of SV?
-a majority is not neccesary to be voted in
-some may still vote tactically
-not fully proportionate
what was the scottish independence referendum
2014
85% turnout
55% yes 45% no
what was the good friday agreement
1998
a devolved power sharing coalition gov in NI
what are marginal seats?
seats help by an mp with a small majority so it can easily switch to the opposition