paper one participation and democracy Flashcards
(127 cards)
what is direct democracy?
the direct unhampered involvement of the people in political life, a system where people make all the key decisions themselves.
what is the referendum?
when people vote on a single issue usually framed as a yes or no question. it is a popular vote on public policy
are there any other forms of direct democracy?
e-petitions have made it easier for people to express public opinions, however this does not automatically torgger a parliamentary vote.
eg: pro-brexit pro-romanian petitions failed after 2016
Recall of MPs
what is a pro and a con of direct democracy?
Direct democracy allows citizens to make decisions directly through referendums but this can lead to poor decision making due to lack of expertise and knowledge.
why can democracies be unstable?
Democracies can be unstable as the government may lose support from ‘the people’ leading to instability or collapse.
‘The people’ are not always united they have different opinions on what is best
what role does the media have in politics?
The media has an important role in shaping public opinion and influencing political outcomes.
Representative Democracy
a form of democracy in which most decisions are made by elected representatives. citizens pass authority to their representatives after voting them in, to make decisions on their behlafs.
Advantages Of A Representative Democracy
the person chosen is usually someone who is educated on political matters, and likely to be rational/professional and not swayed by emotion
Democratically held accountable per elections
it is the only form of practical democracy in a large modern society, where representatives who are politically informed make decisions so ordinary citizens can go about their daily lives without researching politically complex topics
Arguments against a representative democracy
no guarantee that they will act on behalf of the people
Uk electoral system is unrepresentative due to FPTP
the social backgrounds of MPS is narrow so minorities feel excluded and marginalised under this system
why should we reform UK democractic system?
PARTICIPATION CRISIS, where citizens are unengaged with political topics.
turnouts have been declining
>59% in 2001.
>local election turnouts lower 2021, 36%
this feeds into democratic deficit
what is democratic deficit?
(also reasons why the system should be reformed)
a political insitution is not as democratic as it may appear, therefore people lose trust in it.
> ex: the hereditary peers and appointed peers in HOL, 1999 act reduced only to 92 hereditary peer but this did not increase democratic representation in England.
> ex: judges and ministers are also chosen in the UK. we directly vote for MPS, yet we have no say what position or rank they are in parliament. Though we may be able to hold them accountable, this still is undemocratic, as it is not at the will of the people.
Positives of elections
all over 18 can vote
held every 5 years so they are regular and hold gov and electives accountable
we can vote a gov the people mostly agree with on the whole.
Why should we reform the system?
(Refer to unentrenched rights)
- we do not have an entrenched bill of rights so there is no universal rights for citizens. there is no fundamental law meaning the constitutional change can be easily made, so legislation can be passed quickly undermining rights in Britain. this is even when the gov does not have the mandate to make such fundamental democratic choices
ex: Police, crime and sentencing act 2022, placed significant restrictions on the right to peacefully protest, which is essential to liberal democracy
ex: Illegal Migration Act - passed despite gov acknowledging the breach of ECHR. a similar statement acknowledging breach also appeared on the front page of the safety of Rwanda bill.
Negatives Of Elections
FPTP is unfair so some votes are wasted
FPTP is unfair so some votes are wasted
fptp is also unrepresentative and discriminates against minority parties
ex 2024 election 55% of votes were for other parties.
Positives of parliament
House of Commons can hold the government accountable
when passing new laws, many different parties have a say
Negatives of Parliament
House of Lords is unelected, with 92 heridatry peers.
ministers are also unelected, so its undemocratic as it not the will of the people.
Positives of pressure grouts
people are free to join
enhance democracy because they explore a range of issues that are often overlooked by parliament
Negatives of pressure groups
elist and lack eternal democracy, many are forced and you have to be a aprt of it
parlaiment can ignore pressure groups willfully
often viewed as disruptive ex 2012 olympic strikes, as well as 2024 proposed strikes which upset many
what is direct action?
the public actively becoming involved in politics as opposed to dealing through a representative or just voting in elections. this could be legal or illegal direct action.
why do pressure groups use direct action?
as their non direct methods have failed or are unavailable and they are in need of media spotlight and direct action is the method to achieve this, often outsider pressure groups turn to this as they are not privileged to access gov unlike insiders. failure of legal direct action can result in illegal direct action
ex; 2000 fuel crisis where road hauliers and farmers blockaded oil refineries so there was a fuel shortage which upset Blair gov, there was some success, yet it was limited.
RMT CASE STUDY DIRECT ACTION
RMT: aimed to defend the rights of all employed members of transport industry
they used insider methods while labour was in power, for example Blair’s gov until 2004, and now 2024 keir starmers gov. they lobby politicians and use social media to gain media coverage.
successes in 2012, they lobbied politicians for a bonus for the Olympic games and were successful as they threatened strikes, which would disrupt tourism and travel across London, as well as negatively impact London as a tourist city for future years. £800 for workers £1K for train drivers
failures: 2015-16 there were ticket offices in the underground closed, they had many strikes and legal challenges to keep these jobs remaining claiming threat to safety and job security, yet by 2016 290 offices closed.
a reason why it failed was due to lack of public sympathy for the strikes, rendering public opinion as an important success factor for pressure groups.
GREENPEACE CASE STUDY
NGO- to protect forests oceans agriculture etc and protect climate change.
methods: originally outside p.g but have become more ‘wetsuit to business suit’
success: by 2014, their capmagin tfor sustainable tuna fishing was a success and many supermarkets adapted the use of sustainable fishing sources for their tuna cans.
failiure: 2015-16 failiure to stop cairn energy exploring gas reserves in greenland as many were isolated in the indigenous regions and saw this as a way to economically prosper and be more independant than denmark. due to lack of people support in the region and public support, they failed.
extinction rebellion
wants to reduce gas emissions to 0 by 2025 and bring about awareness for climate change and ecological justice.
blood of children demonstration outside downing street throwing blood to represent endangered children lives by climate change was direct action used, and this gained a lot of awareness. the media covered this story and it became popular fast. this successfully through this grotesque display. (publicity stunt)
they also use NON VIOLENT CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE like chaining themselves to road fixtures and gluing themselves to boats and the entrance of the londn stock exchange. as this was non-violent it lulled police into false sense of security while they where overwhelmed by the large number of protestors. this also gained media coverage and widescale public attention.
Positives of devolution
has spread power away from Westminster to national region/
Localised Decision-Making
where local leaders have a better understanding of the specific needs, preferences, and issues of their regions, enabling them to create policies that are more relevant and effective. policies and solutions tailored to their unique circumstances, leads to effective governance and the potential for successful policies to be adopted more widely.
ex:free school tuition and pharmacy prescriptions in Scotland or
ex: council tax etc
Increased Accountability
Elected representatives in regional governments are directly answerable to their local electorate, which can lead to greater transparency and responsiveness. This proximity can also foster greater political engagement and participation among citizens
Improved Public Services
Localised control over public services, such as education, health, and transportation, can result in better service delivery. Regional governments can allocate resources more efficiently based on local needs, leading to higher quality and more accessible services.
Conflict Reduction
In regions with distinct identities or historical grievances, devolution can reduce conflict by granting more autonomy and addressing local concerns. This can lead to greater political stability and unity within the nation.
ex:NI assembly devolved powers and Good friday agreement. there is now a coalition gov in place.
Democratic Strengthening
By spreading power more widely, devolution can strengthen democratic institutions and processes. It encourages a more pluralistic political environment and reduces the concentration of power in a central authority.