Format for Message Question:
m + evd + exp
What does the source tell you about Citizenships in B?
m + evd + exp
What is the message of Source B?
m + evd + exp
Format for Attitude Question:
2 Cases:
1) author approves of (issue) as (attitude) towards issue, telling us (m) + Evd + Exp
2) author is (attitude) towards issue, telling us (m) + Evd + Exp
Does the author approve of the government’s decision making?
1) author approves of (issue) as (attitude) towards issue, telling us (m) + Evd + Exp
Is the author a supporter of Germans in Singapore?
1) author is supportive of (issue) as (attitude) towards issue, telling us (m) + Evd + Exp
What does the source tell you about the attitude of the author?
2) author is (attitude) towards (issue), telling us (m) + Evd + Exp
Format of Purpose Question:
author made speech because he wanted to address (context) + Wants audience to know (m) + Evd + Exp + (o)
Why did the author make this speech?
author made speech because he wanted to address( context) + wants to let the audience know (m) + Evd + Exp + (o)
Why was this poster made?
author made poster because he wanted to address (Context) + Wants audience to know (m) + Evd + Exp + (o)
Format of Comparison Questions:
P1 -> Comparison to Content
P2 -> Comparison to Attitude
P3 -> Comparison to Purpose
Paragraph Format: BOC + m + Evd + Exp
How similar are the two sources in addressing Singapore’s food problem?
P1 -> Comparison of Content
P2 -> Comparison of Attitude
P3 -> Comparison of Purpose
Paragraph Format : BOC + m + Evd + Exp
How different are the two sources?
P1 -> Comparison of Content
P2 -> Comparison of Attitude
P3 -> Comparison of Purpose
Paragraph Format : BOC + m + Evd + Exp
Format of Reliability Question:
P1 -> m + evd + exp
P2 -> x-ref with another source [m + evd + exp] x2 + state whether m is similar or different, if similar then A supports B
P3-> CAP or analysis of provenence (As a … , expected vs actual, evd if diff from actual is (eee) rather than (bbb), + outcome
How reliable is the source in telling us whether Bangkok was a part of Singapore?
P1 -> m + evd + exp
P2 - > x-ref with another source [m + evd + exp] x2, if similar (m), A is supported by B and thus is reliable
P3 -> CAP or analysis of provenence (As a … expected vs actual, evd if diff must say (AAA) rather than (BBB) + outcome
Is Source G reliable in showing the use of fun?
P1 -> m + evd + exp
P2 - > x-ref with another source [m + evd + exp] x2, if similar (m), A is supported by B and thus is reliable
P3 -> CAP or analysis of provenence (As a … expected vs actual, evd if diff must say (AAA) rather than (BBB) + outcome
