5 main categories of risk to which insurer is exposed
Market
Credit
Insurance UW
Operational
Strategic
Market Risk
risk to firm’s current investments from changes in market variables (equity indices, interest rates, foreign exchange, etc)
Credit Risk
-risk of loss due to credit events
(counterparty default, changes in counterparty rating etc)
market securities/derivatives/swap positions credit risk
firm’s investments in these securities may lose value from credit events
insured’s contingent premiums & deductibles receivable credit risk
insurer is exposed to risk that insured may not pay balance that it owes
reinsurance recoveries: most difficult to estimate due to 3 unique aspects:
Insurance Underwriting Risk
3 categories
operational & strategic risk & issue
Operational risks: failure of people/systems/processes
Strategic risks: related to competitors
-hard to quantify these
UW risk
-risk that losses and expenses from the NB including renewals written and/or earned during risk horizon period exceeds the premiums collected
reinsurance recoverables credit risk also includes
partial default (settling at less than full recovery due to disputes with reinsurer)
methods to quantify UW eisk
-several methods can be used to quantify this risk
Loss ratio distribution model
Frequency and severity model
Inference from reserve risk models
Property-Catastrophe Risk - why historical experience is not best indication of future losses
Events are rare
Exposures change over time
Severities change over time due to changes in building materials and designs
-catastrophe models are therefore used
catastrophe models often have several modules
once insurer has derived the individual distributions of risks
it will then need to aggregate them
-in order to do this, dependency between risks need to be considered
dependency is different to correlation
correlation looks at linear relationship
3 methods to quantify the dependency:
empirical analysis of historical data disadvantage
usually there is insufficient data to calculate the historical dependency, there is little insight as to how the dependencies will change during tail events
subjective estimates adv & disadv
advantage: can account for tail events, reflects the user’s intuition
disadvantage: as number of risk categories increases, number of dependency parameters that need to be estimated increases exponentially
explicit factor models
these link the variability of risks to common factors
once dependency has been estimated, insurer can aggregate the distributions using one of several available techniques