HealthPsyc1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is health?

A

WHO (1948) definition of health as a:
“State of complete physical, mental and social well-being…not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”

• Bircher (2005) defines health as
“a dynamic state of well-being characterised by a physical and mental potential, which satisfies the demands of life commensurate with age, culture, and personal responsibility”

• Indigenous Australian people define health as
“not just the physical well-being of the individual but refers to the social, emotional, spiritual and cultural well-being of the whole community. This is a whole of life view and includes the cyclical concept of life-death life”

No one single definition- complex multifaceted concept extending beyond biological aspects of individual functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

• Biomedical model of illness

A
  • Symptoms of illness considered to have underlying pathology
  • Removal of pathology&raquo_space; restored health
  • May be mechanistic, too reductionist- ignores the fact that different people respond in different ways to illness because of differences (e.g. personality, social support, cultural beliefs).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

• Biopsychosocial model of illness

A
  • Psychological and social factors can add to biological or biomedical explanations and understanding of health and illness
  • Diseases and symptoms can be explained by a combination of physical, social, cultural, and psychological factors
  • Employed in health psychology, allied health professionals, and increasingly in medicine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Health psychology

A

Health psychology is an interdisciplinary field concerned with the application of psychological knowledge and techniques to health, illness, and health care.
• Devoted to understanding psychological influences on how people:
• Stay healthy
• Why they become ill
• How they respond if they do become ill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Health enhancing behaviours

A
Healthy eating
• Exercise
• Safe sex
• Screening
• Vaccination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Health Risk Behaviours

A
  • Sedentary lifestyle
  • Smoking
  • Alcohol
  • Salt consumption
  • Fat consumption
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why are we looking at models of health behaviour?

A

Theoretical models have been proposed and tested in terms of their ability to explain and predict why people engage in health risk or health enhancing behaviours.

  • Why do individuals smoke? What factors predict whether or not someone engages in smoking?
  • The models we will describe have identified many modifiable influences upon health behaviour that offer potential targets for health intervention- promotion and education
  • Using models of health behaviour- we can design interventions to address the modifiable influences on a behaviour such as smoking (e.g. overcoming barriers, highlighting benefits, increasing confidence to quit).
  • We want to underpin our research and interventions with evidence based theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Transtheoretical model

A

Stage model of behaviour change- individuals can be at ‘discrete ordered stages’, each one denoting a greater inclination to change
• Transtheoretical model (Prochaska, 1979 Prochaska and DiClemente, 1984) provides a framework for explaining how behaviour change occurs as individuals move through stages of motivational readiness
• Makes 2 broad assumptions:
• People move through stages of change
• Processes involved at each stage differ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Transtheoretical Model 5/7 Stages of Change

A

Precontemplation
• Has no intention of taking action within the next 6 months

  • Contemplation
  • Intends to take action within the next 6 months.
  • Preparation
  • Intends to take action within the next 30 days and has taken some steps in this direction.
  • Action
  • Has changed overt behaviour for less than 6 months
  • Maintenance
  • Has changed overt behaviour for more than 6 months.
  • Termination
  • Behaviour change has been maintained for an adequate time for the person to feel no temptation to lapse
  • Relapse
  • Where a person lapses into their former behavioural pattern and returns to a previous stage (common, can occur at any stage)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Transtheoretical Model Implications

A

The model is not linear
• People can enter and exit at any point and some people may repeat a stage several times

  • It implies that different interventions are appropriate at different stages of health behaviour change
  • Implications for interventions&raquo_space; little point in trying to show how to achieve change if in precontemplation; that type of intervention may be more beneficial if individual in planning or action stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Transtheoretical model- tailoring intervention

A

Implies that different interventions are appropriate at different stages of health behaviour change

  • Precontemplation
  • Individuals more likely to be using denial, may report lower self efficacy and more barriers to change
  • Contemplation
  • More likely to seek information and may report reduced barriers and increased benefits- although may still underestimate their susceptibility
  • Preparation
  • People start to set their goals and priorities, and some will make concrete plans. Motivation and self efficacy are crucial if action is to be elicited
  • Action
  • Realistic goal setting is crucial if action is to be maintained. Use of social support is important to receive reinforcement of change
  • Maintenance
  • Can be enhanced by self monitoring and reinforcement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Transtheoretical model- criticisms

A
  • An individual may be in several stages of change at one time (Budd & Rollnick, 1996 heavy drinking study)
  • Perhaps too much focus on motivation and intention- past behaviour is a more powerful predictor of future behaviour (Sutton, 1996)
  • Participants stage of change may not be predictive of success of intervention (Carlson et al., 2003 smoking intervention study)
  • Doesn’t consider social aspects of health behaviour, severity of illness/disease/outcome, characteristics of the individual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Health Belief Model (HBM)

A

The HBM is a social cognitive model that attempts to
explain and predict health behaviours
• This is done by focusing on the attitudes and beliefs of individuals
• The HBM was first developed in the 1950s by social
psychologists Hochbaum, Rosenstock and Kegels
• Since then, the HBM has been adapted to explore a variety of long- and short-term health behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Four Main Factors of HBM

A

According to the model, a person’s readiness to take a health action (e.g. quit smoking, start exercising, practice safe sex) is determined by four main factors:

  • Perceived severity or seriousness of the disease: I believe coronary heart disease is a serious illness contributed to by being overweight
  • Perceived susceptibility of the disease: I believe I am susceptible to heart disease because I am overweight
  • Perceived benefits of the health action: If I lose weight my health will improve, my risk of heart disease will decrease, and I’ll feel good
  • Perceived barriers to performing the action: Finding the time to exercise and eat well in my current lifestyle will be difficult and possibly more expensive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Health Belief Model: Revisions/Extensions

A
  • Becker and Mainman (1975) included general health motivation as a 5th factor.
  • Revisions of the theory (Becker and Rosenstock, 1984) have also included further factors in the HBM
  • Demographic variables
  • Psychosocial variables
  • Cues to action has been added as an additional explanatory variable (e.g. the recent advertisement on TV about the health risks of obesity worried me)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

HBM- criticisms

A

Static model- does not allow for staged or dynamic process
of change in beliefs which later models show
• Assumption that individuals are rational information
processors and decision-makers, which is not always the case
• Limited account of social influences on behaviour

17
Q

The Theory of Planned Behaviour

A
  • Behaviour is thought to be proximally determined by intention
  • Intention is influenced by a person’s attitude towards the behaviour (outcome expectancy, outcome value) and their perception of social pressure regarding the behaviour (subjective norm).
  • Perceived behavioural control (a persons belief that they have control over their own behaviour in certain situations- similar to self efficacy) can directly or indirectly influence health behaviour.
18
Q

The Theory of Planned Behaviour- Attitude

A

• Attitude is made up of two components: outcome
expectancies and outcome evaluations

  • Outcome expectancies: the expected consequences of the health behaviour (e.g. smoking cessation, healthy eating). Can be +/-
  • Outcome evaluation: your evaluation of the favourableness of expected consequences of a behaviour
  • e.g. If I eat breakfast I will gain weight (outcome expectancy), which would be bad (outcome evaluation)
  • e.g. If I eat breakfast I will have more energy and vitality (outcome expectancy), which will be great (outcome evaluation)
19
Q

The Theory of Planned Behaviour- Subjective Norm

A
  • Subjective norm is made up of two components: normative beliefs and motivation to comply
  • Normative beliefs your perception of how other people regard your performance of a behaviour
  • Motivation to comply your desire to comply with the wishes of others
  • e.g. My friends think I should binge drink alcohol more often (normative belief), I want to do what my friends think is cool (motivation to comply)
  • e.g. My “friends” think I should binge drink alcohol more often (normative belief), I think my friends are idiots and I don’t really care if they think I’m cool (motivation to comply
20
Q

The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Perceived

Behavioural Control

A
  • Perceived behavioural control is quite similar to concept of self-efficacy
  • Perceived behavioural control- your beliefs about the extent of your control over your behaviour (especially in the face of barriers)
  • e.g. I believe it will be difficult for me to eat low fat food because my boyfriend will want to eat hot chips
  • e.g. I believe that I can correctly and consistently use a condom, even if its ‘in the heat of the moment’
21
Q

The Theory of Planned Behaviour- Intention

A
  • Intention is thought to be the most proximal predictor of behaviour - with attitude and subjective norm (and most of perceived behavioural control) influencing behaviour through their effect on intention.
  • Intention- your readiness (or plans) to perform a behaviour
  • e.g. I intend to eat 2 pieces of fruit every day from now on
  • e.g. I intend to stop smoking socially when drinking with my friends
22
Q

Theory of Planned Behaviour- Strengths and Criticisms

A
  • The theory of planned behaviour addresses many of the criticisms of the health belief model
  • The relationship between variables is well defined
  • Includes consideration of the social influences on behaviour
  • Considers whether the individual feels able to perform the behaviour
  • However….. Prediction of behaviour from TPB variables is significantly lower than the prediction of intention
23
Q

Intention-behaviour gap

A

Although intentions are an important part of predicting future behaviour— not all intentions are translated into behaviour (Abraham, Sheeran, Norman, Conner, de Vries, & Otten, 1999).
• The inconsistency between strong behavioural intentions and subsequent behaviour has resulted in a theoretical ‘intention behaviour’ gap
• There are two main approaches to addressing the intention behaviour gap
• Adding extra variables (e.g. to the theory of planned
behaviour- moral norm, self regulation, habit)
• Developing new models to explain post-intentional behaviour

24
Q

Post-intentional models

A

Some researchers have developed new models to explain what happens after you form an intention to perform a behaviour
• Focus on post intentional behaviour
• Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)
• Temporal Self Regulation Theory

25
Q

The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)

A
  • HAPA attempts to fill the ‘intention-behavior gap’ by highlighting the role of self-efficacy and action plans (Schwarzer, 1992).
  • It is particularly influential because it suggests that the adoption, initiation and maintenance of health behaviours must be explicitly viewed as a process that consists of at least
  • A pre-intentional motivation phase
  • A post-intentional volition phase
  • It emphasises the importance of self efficacy
26
Q

HAPA 2 Processes

A

• Requires two separate processes
• Motivation (intention)
• Volition (action)
• First, an intention to change is developed, in part on the basis of self-beliefs
• Second, the change must be planned, initiated, and
maintained, and relapses must be managed

27
Q

HAPA- Motivation phase

A

• The HAPA proposes that self-efficacy and outcome
expectancies are important predictors of goal intention (as found in studies with the TPB and perceived behavioural control).
• Perceptions of threat severity and personal susceptibility (perceived risk) are considered a distal influence on actual behaviour, playing a role only in the motivation phase.

28
Q

HAPA- Volition phase

A
  • HAPA proposes that in order to turn intention into action- planning has to take place
  • Gollwitzer’s (1999) concept of implementation intentions- when, where, how plans to turn goal intention into specific plan of action
  • Self efficacy also involved
  • Initiative self efficacy: individual believes they are able to take initiative when planned circumstances arise
  • Coping/maintenance self efficacy: Belief in ones ability to overcome barriers and temptations
  • Recovery self efficacy: Important to get individual back ontrack if they suffer a setback
29
Q

The Health Action Process Approach- Criticisms

A

The body of literature applying HAPA to behaviour is still
limited
• Too rational? - emotion may be neglected
• The social and environmental influences are not considered as directly affecting behaviour, but rather as cognitions

30
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory

A
  • Temporal self-regulation theory (TST) addresses criticisms of the theory of planned behaviour
  • Adds variables to explain the intention-behaviour gap
  • It is novel in that it incorporates behavioural pre-potency (habits), and individual differences in self-regulatory capacity
31
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory 3 Proximal Factors

A

TST posits that health behaviour is proximally determined by three factors:
• Intention strength
• Behavioural pre-potency
• Self regulatory capacity
• The latter two constructs are theorised to have direct influences on behaviour and also to moderate the intention-behavior link.

32
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory- Intention

A
  • Intention strength is a function of:
  • Connectedness beliefs: anticipated connections between one’s behaviour and salient outcomes (i.e., connectedness beliefs); the valence of outcomes can range from negative (costs) to positive (benefits).
  • Temporal proximity: beliefs are weighted by temporal valuations.

• E.g. a health behaviour might include eventual benefits (e.g. improved appearance, better health status), but more temporally proximal – therefore more heavily influential-immediate costs (e.g. inconvenience, monetary costs, time costs).

33
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory- Temporal valuations

A

TPB and other social-cognitive models (HBM, PMT) may not predict adequate intention-behaviour consistency because they have no temporal (immediate vs distal) weighting of anticipated outcomes
• Differing relationship between the proximity and valence characteristics

Health risk behaviours: immediate benefits and delayed costs
Health protective behaviours: largely delayed benefits but immediate costs

34
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory- Self regulation

A

In addition to intention, two important moderating and direct effects on health behaviour performance are:

(1) self-regulatory capacity
(2) behavioral prepotency

Self regulatory capacity
• Self regulation includes impulse control/management of short term desires. Composed primarily of executive functioning resources through the prefrontal cortex.
• Executive functioning refers to the ability of an individual to exert control over cognition, emotion, behaviour, and physiology.

35
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory- Behavioural Prepotency

A

Behavioural pre-potency
• Behavioural pre-potency examines the strength of past performance in similar contexts.
• It is thought to represent a quantifiable value reflecting frequency of past performance and/or presence of cues to action in the environment
• The combination of self regulation and behavioural prepotency determines the likelihood that intentions will be translated into behaviour, and each also has direct influences on behaviour itself regardless of intention.

36
Q

Temporal Self Regulation Theory- Criticisms

A

The body of research using temporal self-regulation theory is
small (but growing!)
• We are still trying to find good ways to measure self-regulation and behavioural pre-potency
• It is unclear whether the model is better than the theory of planned behaviour (but it seems likely)

37
Q

Take home messages

A
  • Models of behaviour provide a useful way of understanding (and hopefully changing) health behaviours
  • The major models have significant overlap in terms of the variables included
  • These models face similar problems in the challenge of understanding behaviour
  • Additional variables might help explain the intention-behaviour gap
  • New research suggests that new models like HAPA and the temporal self-regulation theory might help explain postintentional processes