JVD 2015 #4 - Comparison of Dorsal and Buccal Approaches for Surgical Extraction of the Mandibular Canine Tooth in Cat specimens Using Radiographic and Computed Tomographic Analysis Flashcards
According to “Comparison of dorsal and buccal approaches for surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in cat specimens using radiographic and CT analysis” by Somrak, Marretta, Matheson, et al
what are the mentioned risks of traditional buccal approach mandibular canine extraction?
iatrogenic mandibular fracture or symphyseal separation (big ones), hemorrhage, tissue trauma, root fractures or retained root tips, iatrogenic nerve injury, trauma to frenulum, to middle mental
According to “Comparison of dorsal and buccal approaches for surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in cat specimens using radiographic and CT analysis” by Somrak, Marretta, Matheson, et al,
What approaches have been previously described?
buccal, lingual, this study looked at dorsal approach
According to “Comparison of dorsal and buccal approaches for surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in cat specimens using radiographic and CT analysis” by Somrak, Marretta, Matheson, et al,
how was the study designed and what was measured?
12 cadaver specimens, one side buccal one side dorsal approach;
measured extraction time, closure time, volume of bone lost during alveolectomy (CT),
occurence of iatrogenic jaw fracture or symphyseal separation
According to “Comparison of dorsal and buccal approaches for surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in cat specimens using radiographic and CT analysis” by Somrak, Marretta, Matheson, et al,
was there significant difference between:
mean extraction times,
closure times, total times,
bone loss,
iatrogenic complications
no sig btwn mean extraction times,
statistically sig slower buccal closure times,
overall times no statistical sig diff,
greater bone loss with dorsal but no sig diff,
no complications were noted
