LAW P3 CONTRACT CASES (CRA 2015 goods))

Question 1

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S9)

Answer 1

Rodger v Parish, the vehicle did not have a quality that could render it merchantable

Question 2

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S10)

Answer 2

Baldry v Marshall, the car turned out to be unsuitable for the plaintiffs purposes so he rejected it.

Question 3

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S11)

Answer 3

Re Moore and Laundauer, the buyer could reject the consignment because of the breach of S11

Question 4

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S20)

Answer 4

Grant v Australian knitting mills, if the goods are defective the buyer is entitled to reject

Question 5

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S22)

Answer 5

Roger v Parish, if goods are not of satisfactory quality, it entitles the buyer to reject the goods within a reasonable time

Question 6

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S23)

Answer 6

Bernstein v Pamson motors, before rejecting goods the buyer may be entitled to have defective goods repaired or replaced

Question 7

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S24)

Answer 7

Jackson v Horizon holidays ltd, the claimant can recover damages or price reduction when goods or services fail to meet contractual terms

Question 8

What is the case for CRA 2015 goods (S31)

Answer 8

Karsales ltd v Wallis, fundamental terms of a contract cannot be excluded or limited by unfair clauses