learning theories Flashcards

1
Q

3 learning theories

A

classical conditioning
operant conditioning
social learning theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is classical conditioning ?

A

it explains how we can learn involuntary reflexes through associating stimuli and responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

unconditioned stimulus

A

anything that naturally has the power to produce a response in a human/animal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

unconditioned response

A

natural reflex response to an unconditioned stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

neutral stimulus

A

something in the environment which does not initially cause a response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conditioned stimulus

A

neutral stimulus becomes conditioned stimulus when it acquires the ability to produce a specific response to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

conditioned response

A

learnt response to something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

stimulus generalization

A

when stimuli similar to CS produce the CR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

extinction

A

when CR declines and disappears because the CS is repeatedly presented in the absence of the UCS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

spontaneous recovery

A

when the CR reappears in a weakened form in response to the CS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

discrimination

A

the CR is only produced in response to the CS and not to similar stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evidence for classical conditioning

A
  • watson and rainer
    little albert could be conditioned to become afraid of white rats by pairing the presentation of the rat with a loud noise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how good is the evidence for classical conditioning

A
  • watson and rayner :
  • controlled environment = highly scientific and would have reduced environmental variables which could affect results

however :
- lacks ecological validity so doesn’t show how conditioning occurs in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

comparisons and limitations to classical conditioning

A
  • explains involuntary reflexes which other theories don’t
  • reductionist - ignores influence of biology and focuses on nurture factors
  • suggests we don’t have a choice - determinist, when we are conditioned which may not be true as people choose to overcome fears
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

applications of classical conditioning

A
  • systematic desensitization
  • flooding
  • aversion therapy, associating an addiction with something unpleasant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is operant conditioning

A

voluntary behavior can be influenced through reinforcement and punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

reinforcement

A

encouraging behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

positive reinforcement

A

encouraging a behavior by giving someone something pleasant,
e.g chocolate for tidying up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

negative reinforcement

A

encouraging a behavior by taking away something unpleasant, e.g, taking away chores for doing well in a test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

punishment

A

discourages a behavior by doing something unpleasant to stop it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

positive punishment

A

discouraging behavior by giving someone something unpleasant e.g extra homework for messing around

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

negative punishment

A

discouraging a behavior by taking away something pleasant, e.g phone for being rude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

difference between reinforcement and punishment

A

reinforcement is used when desired behavior occurs and punishment is used when undesired behavior occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

contingency

A

reliability or predictability of the consequence following the behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
for learning to occur, what should contingency be ?
consequence must clearly be linked to the behavior and the individual must perceive that performing a specific behavior will lead to a specific outcome
26
contiguity
refers to timing between behavior and the consequence
27
how should contiguity be for learning to take place ?
consequences need to follow the behavior immediately after if there’s a delay association weakens
28
primary reinforcement
refers to a reinforcement which directly satisfies advice biological needs, e.g drink shelter food warmth comfort
29
secondary reinforcement
things that help to indirectly meet a biological need, eg getting money to buy food
30
4 schedules of reinforcement
fixed interval variable interval fixed ratio variable ratio
31
fixed interval
reinforcer is delivered after a set period of time as long as at least 1 behavior occurs during that time
32
variable interval
reinforcer is delivered after an unpredictable amount of time which averages to a certain level as long as 1 behavior occurs during that time
33
fixed ratio
a reinforcer is given after a specified number of behaviours
34
variable ratio
reinforcer is given after an unpredictable number of behaviors but it averages to a certain number
35
fixed interval example
getting a cup of tea at work every 2 hours if a good job was done
36
weakness of fixed interval
as there’s no suprise it may just be that just before the 2 hour interval good work would be produced, before that the work wouldn’t be as good
37
variable interval example
getting a cup of tea approximately every 2 hours but not being sure at what time period within the 2 hours the cup of tea would be given
38
strength of variable interval
you know a cup of tea is coming for working well but as you don’t know exactly when, you work well for most of the time in anticipation
39
fixed ratio example
getting paid at work for every 100 parts produced
40
variable ratio example
gambling using a slot machine- machine would be expected to pay out over time but person playing wouldn’t know when a reward is going to be given
41
shaping
idea of encouraging complex behaviors, this is done by reinforcing successive approximations of the behavior
42
successful approximations
rewarding behavior should occur in steps and should gradually be more selective with rewards until exact behavior is given
43
chaining
break down behaviors info steps which are taught and reinforced 1 at a time
44
shaping example
when babies start to babble when learning to speak they are initially reinforced by attention but this only continued if the child goes on to produce recognizable words and later a series of words
45
thorndike - operant conditioning
cats and puzzle box : cats used trial and error to try and escape the puzzle box with positive reinforcement cat food helped them to remember how to escape the puzzle box behavior changes due to consequence
46
skinner - skinners box - operant conditioning
- box which animals are put in with levers which delivered a positive, eg food or negative reinforcement, eg shock rats quickly learnt to go straight to the lever which delivered food (reward) positive reinforcement
47
skinner - superstitious pigeon - operant conditioning
- pigeons placed in a box and were randomly dispensed food - pigeons started to dance as they thought whatever action they did when food was delivered would reward them - tried to repeat and get further rewarded associated beauvoir with food - reward can reinforce behavior
48
strengths of operant conditioning
Applied Reliable Evidence
49
applications of operant conditioning
- helps to create effective learning systems, particularly for children and animals e.g training them to follow an instructions by giving a reward - explains phobias as they are maintained through avoidance which is negatively reinforced
50
how is operant conditioning reliable ?
- lots of evidence to support it - standardized procedures in controlled conditions
51
evidence for operant conditioning
- skinners box - skinner - superstition pigeons - cats puzzle box
52
operant conditioning lovaas theory
- used behavior modification to treat children with autism - therapy of reinforcement and punishment
53
weaknesses operant conditioning
- ethics - fails to consider intrinsic motivation
54
operant conditioning ethics
behavior modification gives therapists power to determine behavior of patients open to abuse not protected from harm - animals used in experiments may be distressed
55
how does operant fail to consider intrinsic motivation
- properties of reinforcement provide complete account of human motivation - reinforcement is linked to extrinsic motivation which are outside factors - but we can also be intrinsically motivated by our own enjoyment
56
is classical conditioning voluntary or involuntary
involuntary, NS causes UCS
57
is operant conditioning voluntary or involuntary work responses
- voluntary - behavior is associated with consequence
58
what is the role of the learner in classical conditioning
passive - learner internalizes their natural environments and learns information
59
role of learner operant conditioning
involved active participation of the learner - consciously changing behavior
60
timing of stimulus classical conditioning
interval between C + UCS
61
timing of stimulus operant conditioning
reinforcement schedule dictates when and how often behavior will be reinforced
62
what was the aim of vaughan et al study
- researchers wanted to find out about urination of cows and defactation habits of cows - used both operant and classical conditioning to see if they could get cows to urinate in a specific place
63
sample vaughan et al
24 cows 12 calves given UCS of a diuretic which caused USR of ruination 12 calves milk allowance was cut to make milk a better reward -
64
how were the 12 cows classically conditioned
given diuretic which caused UCR of urination cows were given diuretic in the stall which made them urinate in the stall when diuretic was no longer used cows were conditioned to urinate in stall
65
how were 12 cows operant conditioning
12 calves milk allowance was cut to make milk a better reward when calf urinated bell rang and they were given milk as a reward whenever they urinated in the stall
66
vaughan et al which condition worked better ?
operant conditioning
67
strengths of evidence operant conditioning
- highly scientific - well controlled environment
68
weakness of experiments operant conditioning
- lacks ecological validity - often uses animals which can’t always be generalized to humans
69
limitations of operant conditioning
- ignores cognitive processes such as specific behavior patterns - reductionist - ignores influence of biology
70
what is the social learning theory
learning occurs through observation someone we look up to or relate to (role model) after we observe behavior we can imitate them
71
what characteristics are important for a role model ?
whether they are of high status if they share similar characteristics or interests same gender similar age
72
what factors affect imitation
- characters of the observer, self esteem, self efficacy - consequences of behavior of the model, whether they are rewarded or punished
73
what is vicarious learning
we learn through others mistakes or successes
74
vicarious reinforcement
when you imitate the behavior of someone who has been reinforced for that behavior
75
example of vicarious reinforcement
avoiding hot water after seeing another person get burnt by it
76
vicarious punishment
tendency to engage in a behavior is weakened after having observed negative consequences for another engaging in that behavior
77
vicarious extinction
occurs when it is noticed that the person who has bdddn observed in engaging in a behavior jd no longer rewarded for that behavior
78
what are the stages of social learning theory
observation / attention retention reproduction motivation
79
observation
active process through which observer chooses to focus their attention on the modeled behavior
80
retention
individual must retain or store what they’ve seen assisted by imagery or language and stored by mental images
81
reproduction
person shows behaviors they have seen modelled self efficacy is important here
82
influence of self esteem social learning theory
people are more likely to copy role models who were similar to them, getting positive feedback
83
influence of self efficacy social learning theory
- having previous successful experiences, observing and imitating peoples responses
84
motivation social learning theory
- final stage, refers to incentive if reward is offered we are more likely to reproduce behaviors
85
vicarious reinforcement
people learn new behaviors by observing and imitating others - a behavior is learnt by observing others being rewarded for it
86
vicarious punishment
someone sees another person experience negative consequences of a behavior
87
extrinsic motivation
- if behavior is rewarded, something tangible - revolves around a physical outcome
88
intrinsic motivation
- inherent satisfaction that comes from within 3.g excitement
89
what were the studies to support social learning theory
- bandura 1961 - bandura 1963 - bandura 1965
90
bandura 1961 aim
to investigate if aggressive behavior is learnt by children imitating an aggressive role model
91
bandura hypothesis 1961
- children will imitate same sex role models - boys are likely to be more aggressive than girls - observing an aggressive model will reproduce aggressive acts - observing a non aggressive role model or no role model at all will lead to to less aggressive behavior
92
sample bandura 1961
- 72 children from stanford nursery school - aged 37-69 months - 36 boys 36 girls
93
aggressive model - bandura 1961
- children observed adult aggressively
94
non aggressive model (bandura 1961)
- children observed a non aggressive adult
95
no model bandura 1961
- children observed no adults at all
96
how were children matched and assigned to watch each model bandura 1961
- matched on levels of natural aggression before their experiment
97
how were the children’s natural levels of aggression assigned
- children’s nursery teacher and the experimenter rated their aggression levels out of 5 looking for physical and verbal aggression and aggression inhibition, towards objects
98
who saw the aggressive model ?
6 - boys dee aggressive make model 6- boys see aggressive female model 6- girls see aggressive male model 6 - girls see aggressive female model
99
who saw non aggressive model - bandura 1961
same as aggressive but with non aggressive model instead
100
what was stage 1 of bandura 1961
- modelling = children were collected and taken into the experimental room - to keep kids interested they give them a high interest task, eg potato prints - once settled they are taken to see bobo doll - if in aggressive model condition the model is physically and verbally aggressive to the doll
101
give examples of physical and verbal aggression the aggressive model showed the bobo doll
- punching - kicking - throwing doll - hitting doll with mallet - “hit him down” - “he keeps coming back for more” - “sock him in the nose” - “pow”
102
how long does the aggressor spend being aggressive ?
10 mins
103
stage 2- bandura 1961
aggression arousal - child is taken into another room of colorful attractive toys after 2 mins the child is told the toys are for other children and taken out of the room to annoy the children
104
stage 3 bandura 1961 ?
- delayed imitation test - kids are taken to another room with new toys which are either aggressive or non aggressive, mallet, gun
105
stage 3- bandura 1961 how are children observed
experimenter another researcher and model is watching behind a one way mirror except for 1 experimenter who watched kid in room pretending to do work
106
how long is the child observed for in stage 3-
20 mins recorded every 5 seconds
107
what were the observers looking for during stage 3 bandura 1961
- imitative aggression - partial imitation - non imitative aggression
108
findings bandura 1961
children who saw aggressive model were more imitavely aggressive towards bobo doll boys were more likely to imitate same sex models then girls boys were more physically aggressive than girls
109
bandura 1963 aims
investigate whether a filmed model would hood to have the same effect as a live model on children’s aggression second aim was to investigate whether cartoon aggression would have a similar impact to realistic filmed aggression
110
experiment type bandura 1963
lab experiment independent groups designs
111
sample bandura 1963
48 boys 48 girls aged 39-52 months stanford university nursery
112
independent variable bandura 1963
- model
113
dependent variable bandura 1963
- level of aggression child displayed
114
bandura 1963 live aggression condition
- watched an adult aggressive bobo doll in real life
115
filmed realistic aggression bandura 1963
watched tv model aggressive vovo on screen
116
cartoon aggression bandura 1963
watched tv modem dressed as black cat do some aggressive actions to a bobo doll
117
control group bandura 1963
- did not watch aggression
118
procedure bandura 1963
- same as original surfy children are frustrated and observed in a playroom
119
conclusion bandura 1963
- exposure to live or filmed aggression increases likelihood of aggression in response to frustration even if aggression is modeled by a cartoon figure
120
bandura 1965 aim
- to consider whether reinforcement and punishment of an aggressive model would influence the aggression displayed by observers in response to frustration
121
sample bandura 1965
- 33 boys 33 girls - 42-71 months - stanford nursery
122
independent variable bandura 1965
- observed consequence for model
123
dependent variable bandura 1965
- children’s aggression
124
what were the 3 conditions bandura 1965
- model rewarded condition - model punished condition no consequence condition
125
model rewarded condition bandura 1965
- children saw adult praise model for aggression they were gifted chocolate and a drink
126
no consequences condition bandura 1965
- model neither reinforced or punished
127
bandura 1965 process -
- children were taken into a playroom and frustrated like before but all 3 groups were offered rewards to aggress towards the doll
128
bandura 1965 findings
- children in model punished condition were less aggressive than other 2 groups however adding a reward wiped out the difference increasing scores significantly for all groups
129
conclusion bandura 1965
- vicarious punishment reduces aggression however reinforcement is a more powerful influence on aggression
130
evidence - social learning theory
- bandura showed learning occurs through observation as the children behaved more aggressively if the behavior demonstrated was aggressive particularly if it was a similar role model
131
how good is evidence - social learning theory bandura
- highly controlled environment so more internal validity - lacks ecological validity - ethically questionable as we are unsure over consent
132
social learning theory comparisons and limitations - kendler et al
1 found identical twins are more similar in aggression than non identical twins suggesting genetics plays a role reductionist - ignoring biology
133
social learning theory applications
A violence in the media violent tv shows are shown after 9pm violent video games have she rating to avoid children copying behaviors explains acquisition of phobias and how kids could gain phobias from parents