Lecture 10 - Constructivism Flashcards
(30 cards)
What is the core assumption of Constructivism in IR?
Constructivism assumes that the international system is shaped by socially constructed realities — not fixed structures. Ideas, beliefs, identities, and norms determine state behavior, not just material factors like power or wealth.
What does “social construction” mean in Constructivist theory?
Social construction refers to the idea that many aspects of international politics (e.g., sovereignty, anarchy, norms) only exist because actors collectively believe in them and act accordingly — they are not objective, material facts.
How does Constructivism view “anarchy” in the international system?
Constructivists argue that anarchy is what states make of it. Anarchy exists, but how states respond to it depends on social interactions, shared understandings, and identities — not just fear or self-help (as Realists claim).
Why is identity central to Constructivist thought?
Identities shape interests. States do not act according to fixed, rational interests; they act based on how they see themselves and others. Identity is produced and reproduced through interaction.
How does Constructivism differ from Realism and Liberalism?
Unlike Realism and Liberalism, which treat interests and the state system as given, Constructivism sees both as contingent and changeable. Interests emerge through social interaction, not from human nature or fixed structures.
What are “norms” in Constructivist IR?
Norms are collective expectations about appropriate behavior for actors with a given identity. They shape what states consider legitimate and guide state behavior even without material enforcement.
Give an example of how norms shape state behavior.
The global norm against the use of chemical weapons discourages even powerful states from using them due to fear of moral condemnation, not just military retaliation
What role does language play in Constructivist IR theory?
Language shapes how we understand the world. Constructivists analyze how discourses — the ways we talk about things — construct meanings, identities, and realities in global politics.
What is the “mutual constitution” of agents and structures?
In Constructivism, agents (like states) and structures (like norms or institutions) co-create each other. Structures influence what actors can do, but actors can also change those structures through action.
Who are some key thinkers in Constructivist IR?
Alexander Wendt: “Anarchy is what states make of it.”
Nicholas Onuf: Coined the term “Constructivism” in IR.
Martha Finnemore & Kathryn Sikkink: Known for work on norm dynamics.
What is Wendt’s main contribution to Constructivism?
Wendt challenged Realism by arguing that power politics are not inevitable but shaped by social interaction. States develop interests through repeated engagement, which shapes identities and expectations.
What are the three cultures of anarchy Wendt describes?
Hobbesian (enemies)
Lockean (rivals)
Kantian (friends)
These are different possible “logics of anarchy” depending on social interaction.
How can norms change over time according to Constructivists?
Through norm entrepreneurs, transnational advocacy networks, and socialization processes — actors push for new norms, and others adopt them through persuasion or social pressure.
What is the “norm life cycle”?
Norm emergence
Norm cascade (widespread adoption)
Norm internalization (taken for granted)
(Finnemore & Sikkink)
How does Constructivism explain the decline in slavery or colonialism?
These shifts are due not only to economics or power, but to changing moral norms and values that made these practices unacceptable in the international community.
How does Constructivism explain cooperation?
States cooperate not only out of rational self-interest, but because of shared norms, common identities, or the desire to be seen as legitimate or “good” members of the international community.
How does Constructivism understand “national interest”?
Interests are not fixed. They are socially constructed and shaped by norms, identity, and interaction. What one state views as a priority may change over time with evolving ideas.
Can material power be interpreted differently under Constructivism?
Yes. Material capabilities (like nukes) matter, but their meaning depends on social context. A nuke in North Korea is feared; in the UK, it’s not — because of perceived identity and intent.
How does Constructivism understand “sovereignty”?
Sovereignty is a social institution — not just legal. Its meaning has changed (e.g., from non-intervention to responsibility to protect) as global ideas and norms evolved.
What are some limitations or criticisms of Constructivism?
Often lacks clear predictive power
Relies heavily on interpretation and discourse
Can struggle to explain hard material interests (like war for resources)
Sometimes overlaps with poststructuralism without clear boundaries
How does Constructivism conceptualize the role of norms in international relations?
Constructivism posits that norms are intersubjective understandings that shape state behavior by defining what is considered appropriate. These norms are not static; they evolve through social interaction and can influence the identities and interests of actors within the international system.
In what way does Constructivism challenge the Realist notion of anarchy?
While Realism views anarchy as a self-help system leading to power competition, Constructivism argues that anarchy’s implications are not predetermined. Instead, the meaning of anarchy is constructed through social interactions and shared understandings among states, making it a variable, not a constant.
What is the significance of identity in Constructivist theory?
Identity is central in Constructivism as it shapes how states perceive themselves and others, influencing their interests and actions. Identities are formed and reformed through social interaction, and they determine the range of acceptable behaviors for states within the international community.
How does the concept of “norm localization” contribute to our understanding of norm diffusion?
Norm localization, introduced by Amitav Acharya, explains how local actors adapt and modify external norms to fit their own cultural and institutional contexts. This process highlights the agency of local actors in shaping norm adoption, demonstrating that norm diffusion is not a one-way process from the global to the local.