Lecture 11 -> Political violence Flashcards
(27 cards)
Define Political Violence
- Political violence: violence outside of state control that is politically motivated
Actions carried out by nonstate actors. The intent is to lead to policy or institutional change. Crime is NOT political violence (lacks political motivation)
What is contentious politics
collective struggle carried out to achieve a political goal
Contentious politics can be violent or nonviolent.
Some consider political violence to be a form of contentious politics
What are the three explanations for violence
Institutional, Ideational, individual
Explain institutional reasoning for political violence
existing institutions may encourage violence or constrain human action, creating a violent backlash.
Explain ideational reasoning for political violence
Ideas may justify or promote the use of violence.
It is not only the content of the ideas that matter but also their relation to the status quo.
Explain individual reasoning for political violence
Psychological or strategic factors may lead people to carry out violence.
E.g. desperation and solidarity
The suffragets
The question of what is radical?
Democracy = common in west, but Hong Kong protests for democracy is seen as radical by the Chinese
What is the effect of perspective on political violence?
“One person’s terrorist is another person’s
freedom fighter”
What are the two main forms of violence
Revolution (uprising of the masses) and Terrorism (Represents conspirationial action carried out by small groups)
What is a revolution and its aim
- Revolutions: often have a vanguard; but also involve the public (i.e. not a coup d’état and hence some scholars describe the Russian Revolution as a coup)
- People are looking to gain control of the state
- Government change is not enough: the aim is regime change
What events are not a revolution
Coup d’etat, elites remove a regime and replace it
Negotiated transition, gov and opposition plan a new system
Secessionist, local control
what is the deprivation model:
predicts revolution when public expectations outpace the rate of domestic change.
Example of an individual explanation.
Basis of modern grievance-based explanations
for violence.
When is relative deprivation frustration more
likely to be triggered?
- Rapid economic growth creates unmet expectations.
- Some (ethnic, racial, class) groups are benefiting more than others.
- Possible examples: Iran, 1979; Egypt, 2011
what year did Europe break into revolution
1989 -> collapse of communism/ USSR
what is the Institutional approaches to the causes of revolution
An approach arguing that revolutions require a specific set of conditions
The conditions creating openings for revolution
Competition with rival states betrays regime weakness.
Weak(er) states seek to reform to boost their international power.
These reforms upset status quo, sowing dissent in elite and discord in
masses.
Possible examples: France, 1789; Russian Revolution, 1917
neglects role of individuals and ideas
What are the outcome of revolution
authoritarian government and increased
violence
When does revolution lead to democratic regime change?
If there is widespread public involvement
If protests are nonviolent
Define terrorism
Use of violence by nonstate actors against
civilians in order to achieve a political goal.
It is an act of violence intended to cause fear
Define state-sponsored terrorism
terrorism supported directly by a state as an
instrument of foreign policy
what is a current example of state sponsored terrorism
Pakistan sponsored groups in Kashmir, India
Can a state perpetrate acts of terrorism?
contentious - some authors would stress that
automatically excluding the state from
definitions of terrorism tends to legitimise its
monopoly of violence, and others say that such acts by a state can be labelled differently
what is Guerrilla War?
Nonstate combatants target the state
simple way to remember different forms of violence
state + state = war
state + nonstate = guerrilla war
civilians + state = human rights violation or war crime
civilians + nonstate = Terrorism
Why does religion or ideology turn violent especially in a time of modernity?
modernity is seeking to exterminate believers. The righteous are locked in a cosmic battle with modernity. Civilians are ultimately guilty enablers of moral bankruptcy. Dehumanising the enemy is a key strategy.