Lecture 20 : Sprinting Mechanics of Performance and Fatigue Flashcards
(33 cards)
sprint running and rowing are very different in terms of sprinting
explain how their angular velocity, peak force, application times and SSC differ
sprint running : very high angular velocities, peak forces and short application times, fast SSC
rowing : low angular velocities, high peak forces, long applications times, slow SSC
when you become an elite athlete shorter application windows are more influenced by what and longer application windows are more influenced by
shorter more influenced by fibre type
longer more influenced by MVC
as elite athletes indivdual characteristics such as these make more of a difference as they are usually at their ceiling.
how do these compare in terms of trainability
strength
RFD
RR
elasticity
strength is highly trainable, RFD, RR and elasticity are less so
how does contraction duration change when accelerating from a static position
contraction duration is initially quite long, gets shorter with each subsequent contraction so you have less time to apply force
there is an optimal point of combination of contractile speed and force which optimises power, what happens if speed increases above this
power can diminish
increasing PCr stores does what for one off sprints
nothing.
fatigue usually occurs when in sprinting
in 10s
the concept of optimal cadence is
cadence at which peak power is achieved
how has the concept of optimal cadence changed track cycling and decreased times
increased gearing size which has allowed athletes to race at cadences that optimise power
the faster your sprint the less time for
less time for force application
usually reach peak power when in an 100m sprint
about 10 m into the race so power is descending for the rest of it
how does the gear change that happened in cycling link to running and why it would be very hard for someone to beat usan bolts time
his long legs…
The gear change analogy explains why you can’t just run faster by moving your legs quicker — you need to produce more force and maintain stiffness, just like pushing a harder gear in cycling.
Usain Bolt’s unique combination of limb length, force output, while still being able to have an increase stride frequency makes replicating his performance incredibly difficult.
for a shorter athlete to be able to compete with usan bolt they would need ..
unfeasible proportions (>90% type II) to compete with him
Ken Clarke thinks the new 100m world champ will need to be taller than Bolt, but what are the disadvantages to this
power to weight : skeletal mass relative to muscle CSA
aerodynamic drag : larger frontal surface
what are two key factors influencing force application at speed
time available for force application (RFD and RR key components)
ability to apply force at high angular velocities
what is needed to improve the ability to apply force at high angular velocities
optimise number of sarcomeres in series
fast twitch fibres produce more force and power at every speed, when does the advantages of higher proportions of these become more apparent
as speed increases
power in short sprinting decreases after how many seconds
2-4
conventional literature says that changing excursion angle to modify contact length is not really feasible why
because they say it limits vertical force and can lose efficiency
what is the BUT in to the conventional literature saying that changing excursion angle to modify contact length is not really feasible
if we could change the length tension curve of muscle with appropriate training it could work
it would perhaps provide options for increasing horizontal force
perhaps we could bounce efficiently from longer muscle lengths
if increasing excursion angles were possible what would the implications be
shorter runners could increase CL and thus increase ground contact time, perhaps negating some of the impulse time advantages of the taller athlete
what it the BUT for the shorter runner if we were able to increase excursion angles
could increase GCT
but
would have very high angular velocities which would require a lot of fast muscle or sarcomeres in series
nonetheless there may be some advantage to increasing excursion angles
some evidence suggests that longer fascicle lengths could what
could be metabolically advantageous by reducing metabolic energy expenditure
to change the length tension curve, what type of contraction is most likely to be possible to do this
eccentric training