Lecture 6 - Social Categorisation, Stereotypes and Prejudice Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

What is personal identity?

A

Personality characteristics e.g. introverted, honest, caring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is social identity?

A

Groups you are a member of e.g. woman, business executive, collect stamps -> stereotyping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a stereotype?

A

“Widely shared and simplified evaluative image of a social group and its members” (Hogg & Vaughan, 2014, p.47)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a category?

A

Collections of instances that have a family resemblance organised around a prototype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are prototypes?

A

Cognitive representation of typical defining features of a category (standards against which family resemblance is assessed & category membership decided)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the process of categorisation

A

“The process of understanding what something is by knowing what other things it is equivalent to, and what other things it is different from” (McGarty, 1999 - cited in Crisp & Turner, 2014, p.53)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are categories rigid?

A

No - categories not rigid, but fuzzy i.e. move and change (Rosch, 1978)

More or less typical of the category

Depending on the prototype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens when trying to categorise less typical members?

A

Categorisation of less typical members is more difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe an example of how social identity leads to stereotyping

A

Characteristics of person? – e.g. mask, stripy jumper, ‘SWAG’ bag

How would you describe this person? – e.g. burglar

If it is a burglar, what does this mean? – e.g. steals other peoples’ possessions, criminal, dangerous?

Why does it matter? – e.g. you want to run away

We categorise people, give assumptions based on category, influences behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why do we categorise? - save cognitive energy

A

Saves time & cognitive processing

Simplify how individuals think about world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why do we categorise? - clarifies and refines perception of the world

A

Once category is activated - tend to see members as possessing all traits of the stereotype

Reducing uncertainty, predict social world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why do we categorise? - maintain a positive self-esteem

A

Motivational function for social identify & self-concept

E.g. understand what group you are and how others are different (understand self)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some common group distinctions?

A

Sexual orientation

Profession

‘Class’

Race

Age

Employment status

Nationality

Immigrant status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the illusory correlation?

A

Negative stereotypes may occur when people inaccurately pair minority groups with negative events/behaviours because they are both distinct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Hamilton and Sherman (1996) find about illusory correlations?

A

Asked White American participants to estimate the arrest rate of various types of American

African Americans were estimated to have a higher arrest rate than they, in fact, did

African Americans = relative minority <- illusion that they are correlated -> being arrested = negative and therefore unusual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is behavioural assimilation?

A

An effect of stereotyping

Stereotypes don’t just influence our perceptions of others; they influence our own behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Bargh et al. (1996) show about behavioural assimilation

A

‘Scrambled sentence’ task - making sentences out of randomly ordered words

IV: word types (2 conditions) = (1) ‘elderly’: task used words associated with elderly stereotypes (e.g. grey, lonely, wise, old). (2) Neutral: words unrelated to age (e.g. thirsty, clean)

DV: participants directed to the exit and hidden confederate timed how long it took them to leave room

Participants primed with elderly words behaved in a way related to an ‘elderly’ stereotype i.e. moved more slowly to leave the room (even though ‘slow’ wasn’t primed specifically – it was part of the stereotype activated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are some potential problems with Bargh et al.’s (1996) study?

A

The studies that prime stereotypes (e.g. the Bargh study) often don’t replicate

It might be because the effects are not universal; people might already need to care about what’s being primed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Papies (2015) find in relation to these problems?

A

Papies (2015) found that people who want to become thinner are likelier to make healthy food choices if they are primes, say, with words on a menu such as ‘diet’, ‘thin’ and ‘trim figure’

But it works only in people for whom a healthy diet is a central goal; it doesn’t make everyone avoid fattening foods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is stereotype threat?

A

The threat of negative evaluations can actually lead to poor performance e.g. sinking to the level expected of you when expectations are low

When negative stereotypes define our own groups, and we behave in line with them:

“Feeling that we will be judged and treated in terms of negative stereotypes of our group & that we will inadvertently confirm these stereotypes through our behaviour” (Hogg & Vaughan, 2014, p.383)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are some examples of stereotype threat?

A

Women and maths (Spencer, Steele, & Quinn, 1999)

Men and social sensitivity (Koenig & Eagly, 2005)

Elderly people and memory (Levy, 1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Is the negative impact of stereotype threat inevitable?

A

This negative impact is not inevitable; reframing low expectations as a challenge instead of a threat can eliminate the effect (Alter & al., 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Does stereotype threat replicate across groups?

A

Tan and Barber (2020) examined whether age-based stereotypes impact older Chinese adults

They tested older Chinese participants’ memory recall under a stereotype threat condition (or control condition)

Results demonstrated poorer memory recall in the stereotype threat condition (vs. control)

24
Q

What should be notes in participants in Tan and Barber’s (2020) study?

A

However, it should be noted that participants were immigrants residing in the United States

As shown in other studies, could the effects of stereotype threat be different in Asian participants who still reside in an Asian country (e.g., Zhang et al. 2017)?

25
Alongside behavioural assimilation and stereotype threat, what is a final effect of stereotyping?
Prejudice and discrimination
26
What is prejudice?
Strong, highly accessible negative attitude (dominated by cognitive bias and negative stereotypes)
27
What is discrimination?
Behaviour based on unjust treatment of certain groups: reluctance to help, tokenism, reverse discrimination
28
How does prejudice lead to discrimination?
Intergroup bias (e.g. favouritism) -> intergroup prejudice -> discrimination (but: attitude <-> behaviour?)
29
What did Gaetner and Dovidio (1977) show about reluctance to help as a form of discrimination?
Participants were more reluctant to help a minority member (than their own group) when faced with an emergency, but only when others were present
30
What is tokenism?
Process of favouring a member of a minority group in isolated episodes
31
What did Monin and Miller (2001) show about tokenism?
Found that participants who were given the opportunity to hire a well-qualified minority candidate were willing to discriminate against other minorities in future hiring, as they had already ‘proved’ that they were not prejudiced
32
What is reverse discrimination?
Opening displays pro-minority behaviour but as a way to deflect accusations of prejudice, e.g. giving more money to a minority member when feeling threatened (Dutton & Lake, 1973)
33
Is racism and sexism gone or in new dress?
Dovido et al. (1996): decline of racist attitudes over 60 years But Quillian and Lee (2022): find that hiring discrimination among 170k apps for minority groups has not fallen over the past decades Specific stereotypes changed, but negatively remains
34
What are some features of new/modern racism?
Conflict between evaluation towards out-group and values of equality and egalitarian attitudes (human equality) -> aversive/discomfort (a bit more implicit) Old fashioned -> aversive -> total egalitarianism
35
What is modern or symbolic racism (Kinder & Sears, 1981)?
A theory of subtle prejudice Blaming the victim Support of policies that all happen to disadvantage racial minorities
36
What is ambivalent racism (Katz & Hass, 1988)?
A theory of subtle prejudice High scores on pro-Black attitudes (pity for the disadvantaged) High scores on anti-Black attitudes (hostility toward the deviant)
37
What is ambivalent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 1996)?
A theory of subtle prejudice Hostile sexism paints women in a negative light Benevolent sexism could be seen as apparently positive
38
What causes prejudice?
Two categories of causes: (1) Historical/economical = linked to the psychological notion of frustration of aggression (2) Psychological = individual differences in personality; group processes (such as unequal status)
39
Describe the frustration-aggression hypothesis (Dollard et al., 1939)
Frustration causes aggression (Dollard et al., 1939): ‘Psychic energy’ built up by frustration needs an outlet We find a scapegoat e.g. a minority group. Linked to the Freudian notion of ‘displacement’ When we get angry, we misdirect our anger Also, linked to historical context
40
What evidence is there to support frustration-aggression hypothesis?
Hovland and Sears (1940) Archival study about cotton workers Over a fifty year period measured the price of cotton and number of lynchings of Black workers As frustration increased (i.e. price of cotton fell), lynching increased (displaced aggression)
41
Evaluate the frustration-aggression hypothesis
Can’t determine cause and effect (not the best theory)
42
What are potential psychological causes of prejudice?
Researchers then started to ask: ‘are some types of people predisposed to be prejudiced towards minority groups?’ Authoritarian personality
43
What are some authoritarian personality traits?
Extreme reactions to authority figures, obsession with rank and status, tendency to displace anger Related to upbringing = harsh parental discipline
44
How did Adorno et al. (1950) provide evidence for the authoritarian personality?
Retrospective interviews about childhood Questionnaire (F-scale) monitoring anti-Semitism, ethnocentrism, political and economic conservatism, potential for fascism E.g. ‘a person who has bad manners and poor breeding can hardly expect to get along with decent people’ Correlation between the harshness of upbringing and measures of prejudice
45
What are some criticisms of the authoritarian personality explanation?
Problems with supporting evidence (the F-scale) Correlation evidence – can’t determine cause and effect Poor methodology = relies on memory of upbringing, not all strict upbringings result in fascist, self-report Ignores the social context – need to take into account history and culture (Pettigrew, 1958) Personality can be predicted, but not this personality
46
What did Tajfel (1981) argue caused hatred and suspicion of certain groups instead of personality?
Social learning - hatred and suspicion of certain groups learnt early in life
47
What evidence did Barrett and Short (1992) provide for the social learning explanation?
English children, aged 4-5 years old French and Spanish were liked, followed by Italians, and Germans were liked the least
48
How may parents influence prejudices?
Modelling (child witness expression of racial hatred) Conditioning (parents approval of racist behaviour)
49
How may some group processes such as conformity influence prejudice?
Conforming to group norms Are some groups more prejudiced than others?
50
How did Minard (1952) provide evidence that supports conformity as an explanation for prejudice?
Investigated attitudes of White miners 60% would readily switch between racism & non racism depending on whether situational norms encouraged or discouraged prejudice (e.g. friendly at work then segregated outside of work in society) Being influenced by a group authority figure? e.g. 1920s & 30s Germany
51
What are group relation theories?
“We cannot extrapolate from the properties of individuals to the characteristics of group situations" (Sherif, 1962, p1)
52
What is social identity theory?
We have a social identity as well as a personal one. Made up of how we categorise ourselves in terms of social groups (Turner et al., 1987) Intergroup differentiation: ‘in-group’ vs ‘outgroup’ Depersonalisation In-group bias
53
Why is social identity important?
Helps to maintain self-esteem Social bonding BUT Implications for interaction with out-group members Hypothesised cause of prejudice and stereotyping
54
Describe the blue eyes/brown eyes demonstration (Hogg & Vaughn, 2011)
School teacher Jane Elliot (1968) tried to highlight effects of prejudice to school children (not a psychological experiment – done in a classroom) One day, blue eyed children were ‘inferior’ and had to wear a collar and lost privileges Brown eyed children were very quick to derogate those with blue eyes
55
What did Akrami et al. (2011) do to bring together theories about personality and social-psychology to explain prejudice?
Previous research has almost exclusively examined sexism from either a personality or a social-psychology perspective Akrami et al. explored whether personality (e.g. right-wing authoritarianism) or social-psychological (e.g. group member) – or a combination of both – predicted sexism
56
What were the results found by Akrami et al. (2011)?
Results demonstrated that sexism was best explained by considering the combined influence of both personality- and social-psychology constructs The findings imply that it is necessary to integrate various approaches to explain prejudice