Lecture 8 - Intergroup Relations and Conflict Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

What is intergroup behaviour?

A

“Any perception, cognition or behaviour that is influenced by people’s recognition that they and others are members of distinct social groups is intergroup behaviour” (Hogg & Vaughan, 2014, p.402)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the in-group?

A

Any social group which we feel a sense of belonging/investment/identify with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the out-group?

A

Alternative groups we don’t have a sense of investment/belonging to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What potential negative consequences could come from being in a group?

A

E.g. conflict and prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is relative deprivation?

A

A motivational account which explains intergroup competition/conflict as caused by a sense of having less than we feel entitled to

Perceived gap between expectations or entitlements (‘what ought to be’) and attainments (‘what is’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is deprivation absolute?

A

No, it is relative to other conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does relative deprivation relate to intergroup aggression?

A

It is a crucial precondition for intergroup aggression (Walker & Smith, 2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Berkowitz (1962) suggest intergroup prejudice and discriminatory behaviour was a function of?

A

(1) Aversive events e.g. subjective frustration

(2) Aggressive associations e.g. situational cues, past associations

Leads to collective violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an example of collective violence?

A

1965 LA riots

Relative deprivation caused frustration, which was amplified by aversive environmental conditions (e.g. heatwave)

Individual acts of aggression were exacerbated by aggressive stimuli (e.g. armed police)

Aggression became more widespread and assumed role of dominant response

Aggression spread rapidly through social facilitation processes, resulting in collective violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who made a distinction between two types of relative deprivation?

A

Runciman (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is egoistic relative deprivation?

A

Feeling of having less than we feel we are entitled to

Relative to our personal aspirations/experiences or to other individuals

E.g. a colleague getting a promotion over you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is fraternalistic relative deprivation?

A

Sense that our group has less than it is entitled to

Relative to the collective aspirations or other groups

Associated with social unrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is realistic conflict theory (Sherif, 1966)?

A

Where groups compete over scarce resources, intergroup relations become marked by conflict & ethnocentrism arises (Hogg & Vaughan, 2014, p.408)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is ethnocentrism?

A

“View of things in which one’s own group is at the centre of everything, and all others are scaled and rated with reference to it…” (Sumner, 1906, p. 13)

Evaluative preference for all aspects of own group relative to other groups

Resources e.g. tangible (land), economic (access to jobs), conceptual (power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Sherif’s summer camp studies?

A

Children invited to summer camp (actually a field experiment)

Four phases:

(1) Spontaneous friendship formation

(2) In-group and norm formation (ensure not a function of likeness)

(3) Intergroup competition

(4) Intergroup cooperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe phase 1 (spontaneous friendship formation) of Sherif’s summer camp studies

A

Arrived at camp

Engaged in various activities, friendships formed

17
Q

Describe stage 2 (in-group and norm formation) of Sherif’s summer camp studies

A

Camp divided into two groups, friendships split

Groups isolated, separate living quarters and daily activities, developed norms and status differences

18
Q

Describe phase 3 (intergroup competition) in Sherif’s summer camp studies

A

Introduction of competitive games between the groups -> competition and intergroup hostility

Ethnocentric attitudes and behaviour amplified

Majority of intergroup encounters degenerated into intergroup hostility

Intergroup relations deteriorated -> two of the experiments concluded at this stage

19
Q

Describe phase 4 (intergroup cooperation) in Sherif’s summer camp studies

A

Groups provided with superordinate goals (goals desired by two groups but can only be achieved if the two groups work together)

Groups had to work together in cooperation e.g. superordinate goal = everyone needed to help with broken down truck

Cooperation between the groups to achieve superordinate goal lead to a reduction in intergroup conflict

20
Q

What determines relations between groups in the realistic conflict theory?

A

The nature of the goals

21
Q

What happens as a result of mutually exclusive goals between groups?

A

Realistic intergroup conflict and ethnocentrism

22
Q

What happens as a result of shared (superordinate) goals?

A

Cooperation and reduction in conflict

23
Q

What is a limitation of realistic conflict theory?

A

It cannot explain why intergroup conflict occurs in the absence of a competitive situation

24
Q

What may realistic conflict theory be useful for?

A

Studying conflict in applied settings

25
What did Brewer and Campbell (1976) find?
Greater derogation of more proximal tribal groups led to direct competition for scarce resources
26
What did Fisher (1990, 2005) find?
Establishing superordinate goals can reduce IG conflict between communities & nations
27
What may be some limitations to the further support for realistic conflict theory?
Competitive IG behaviour also Under conditions of explicitly non-competitive or cooperative intergroup relations
28
What is the minimal group paradigm (MGP)?
NOT A THEORY – experimental paradigm which forms the base of social identity theory Tajfel et al. (1971) MGP: experimental methodology to investigate effect of social categorisation alone on behaviour
29
What did Tajfel et al. (1971) do?
Assigned participants to 2 groups (arbitrary selection – preference of painting) Participants only knew their own group membership, not other members or other group Identity of recipients was unknown Asked to allocate money to others (not self)
30
What did Tajfel et al. (1971) find?
In-group favouritism (allocated more points) Despite no history, no self-interest, identity of other members of each group unknown
31
What did Billing and Tajfel (1973) do?
Random allocation to X/Y toss of coin (more arbitrary) To eliminate possibility that participants may infer that people in same group interpersonally similar to one another because of artist preference
32
What did Billing and Tajfel (1973) find?
Mere allocation to a group produced in-group favouritism, and competitive intergroup behaviour
33
What is social identity theory?
“Theory of group membership and intergroup relations based on self-categorisation, social comparison, and the construction of a shared self-definition in terms of in-group defining properties” (Hogg & Vaughan, 2014, p.418)
34
What do social categories provide members with?
Social categories provide members with a ‘social identity’ = part of self-concept derived from membership of social groups Positive distinctiveness and self-enhancement (e.g. favour in-group)
35
How may realistic conflict theory be used to improve intergroup relations?
Existence of super-ordinate goals gradually reduces intergroup hostility and conflict
36
What are some potential limitations of using realistic conflict theory to improve intergroup relations?
Superordinate goals: problem if fail to achieve -> unsuccessful intergroup cooperation may worse IG relations if failure attributed to out-group
37
What is the contact hypothesis (Allport, 1954)?
“Bringing members of opposing social groups together will improve intergroup relations and reduce prejudice & discrimination” (Hogg & Vaughan, 2014, p.441)
38
What are the conditions for contact according to Allport (1954)?
Should be prolonged & involve cooperative activity (work together) Contact between people or groups of equal social status Should occur within framework of official and institutional support for integration