Lecture 2 - Social Cognition and Biases Flashcards
(44 cards)
What is social psychology?
Perceptions and behaviour and how it is influenced by others
What is social cognition?
How we process and store social information, and how this affects our perceptions and behaviour (give rise to new hypotheses and perspectives)
Dominant area in social psychology
What is attribution?
Process of assigning a cause to our own and others’ behaviour (understanding why someone acts the way they do)
What are (social) schemas?
Knowledge about concepts
Make sense of our world with limited information (fill in blanks and predict behaviour)
Facilitate top-down (theory-driven) processing
Can have self-schemas, schemas about other people (stereotypes), events, places e.g. restaurant
What are categories?
Organised hierarchically (associative network = connected stimuli activated in different circumstances)
Fuzzy sets of features organised around a prototype (boundaries around categories are fuzzy)
Categorise what we perceive
What are prototypes?
Cognitive representation of typical defining features of a category (average category member)
What is causal attribution?
An inference process through which perceivers attribute an effect to one or more causes
Metaphors for how lay people practice psychology/process social material
What is the naïve scientist?
People are rational and scientific-like in making cause-effect attributions
All want to understand what happens to us
What is biased/intuitionist?
Information is limited and driven by motivations (leads to errors and biases)
What is cognitive miser?
People use least complex and demanding info processing (cognitive short-cuts)
What is motivated tactician?
Think deeply when required (only when we need to)
Most common now
More efficient
Combination of previous metaphors
Think carefully and scientifically about certain things (when personally important or necessary)
Think quickly and use heuristics for others (when less important so that can do things quickly and get more done)
Who came up with the naïve psychologist theory of attribution?
Heider (1958)
Describe the naïve psychologist theory
Heider and Simmel (1994) = presented stimuli and asked participants to write down what they saw e.g. circles/triangles trying to get out of room – ascribe human feelings to abstract stimuli
Anthromorphising – ascribing human feelings to non-human objects
Homo rationalis = analytical, cogent, balanced, logical
Hypothesis testing
Attribute cause to effects to create a stable world that makes sense
What are the three principles of need?
(1) Need to form coherent view of the world (search for motives in others’ behaviour)
(2) Need to gain control over the environment (search for enduring properties that cause behaviour)
(3) Need to identify internal (personal) vs external (situational) factors
Who came up with attributional theory?
Weiner (1979)
Describe attributional theory
Causality of success or failure
Multi-dimensional approach:
Locus (internal/external)
Stability (e.g. natural ability/mood) – whether behaviour is always the same
Controllability (e.g. effort/luck) – whether things can be changed
Dynamic model:
Performance (success/failure) -> feelings (positive/negative) -> attributions -> specific emotions (e.g. pride) -> expectations ->…
What is attributional retraining?
People are encouraged to make more optimistic attributions
Outcomes are controllable
Success attributed to internal causes
How does Parker et al. (2018) support attributional retraining?
University athletes prone to difficult transition from school
RCT = attributional training or waitlist control
Attributional training = better grades explained by increased perceived academic control
When people believed outcomes were under their control (internal), increased motivation
Used in clinical practices e.g. CBT
Who came up with the correspondent interference theory?
Jones and Davis (1965)
Describe the correspondent interference theory
Whether behaviour reflects an internally driven behaviour (intentional)
Act freely chosen
Non-common effect = effect of behaviour unusual compared to other behaviours
(Not) Socially desirable = more likely to be produced by situation
Hedonic relevance
Personalism = whether behaviour designed to affect you e.g. positive consequences
But: overly focused on internal attribution
Who came up with the covariation model?
Kelley (1967)
Describe the covariation model
Use multiple observations to try and identify factors that co-vary with behaviour (more scientific)
Assign causal role to the factor(s)
Whether behaviour is internal or external is key
Look for 3 bits of information
What is constistency?
Does this behaviour always co-occur with the cause?
Low (e.g. never failed before after nights out) -> discounting – look for different cause
High (always fail if go out night before) -> these are linked
What is distinctiveness?
Is the behaviour exclusively linked to this cause or is it a common reaction?
High (e.g. I never failed other exams) -> attribute to external cause
Low (e.g. I generally fail exams) -> internal attribution