Lecture 2 - Social Cognition and Biases Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

What is social psychology?

A

Perceptions and behaviour and how it is influenced by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is social cognition?

A

How we process and store social information, and how this affects our perceptions and behaviour (give rise to new hypotheses and perspectives)

Dominant area in social psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is attribution?

A

Process of assigning a cause to our own and others’ behaviour (understanding why someone acts the way they do)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are (social) schemas?

A

Knowledge about concepts

Make sense of our world with limited information (fill in blanks and predict behaviour)

Facilitate top-down (theory-driven) processing

Can have self-schemas, schemas about other people (stereotypes), events, places e.g. restaurant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are categories?

A

Organised hierarchically (associative network = connected stimuli activated in different circumstances)

Fuzzy sets of features organised around a prototype (boundaries around categories are fuzzy)

Categorise what we perceive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are prototypes?

A

Cognitive representation of typical defining features of a category (average category member)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is causal attribution?

A

An inference process through which perceivers attribute an effect to one or more causes

Metaphors for how lay people practice psychology/process social material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the naïve scientist?

A

People are rational and scientific-like in making cause-effect attributions

All want to understand what happens to us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is biased/intuitionist?

A

Information is limited and driven by motivations (leads to errors and biases)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is cognitive miser?

A

People use least complex and demanding info processing (cognitive short-cuts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is motivated tactician?

A

Think deeply when required (only when we need to)

Most common now

More efficient

Combination of previous metaphors

Think carefully and scientifically about certain things (when personally important or necessary)

Think quickly and use heuristics for others (when less important so that can do things quickly and get more done)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who came up with the naïve psychologist theory of attribution?

A

Heider (1958)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the naïve psychologist theory

A

Heider and Simmel (1994) = presented stimuli and asked participants to write down what they saw e.g. circles/triangles trying to get out of room – ascribe human feelings to abstract stimuli

Anthromorphising – ascribing human feelings to non-human objects

Homo rationalis = analytical, cogent, balanced, logical

Hypothesis testing

Attribute cause to effects to create a stable world that makes sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the three principles of need?

A

(1) Need to form coherent view of the world (search for motives in others’ behaviour)

(2) Need to gain control over the environment (search for enduring properties that cause behaviour)

(3) Need to identify internal (personal) vs external (situational) factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who came up with attributional theory?

A

Weiner (1979)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe attributional theory

A

Causality of success or failure

Multi-dimensional approach:

Locus (internal/external)

Stability (e.g. natural ability/mood) – whether behaviour is always the same

Controllability (e.g. effort/luck) – whether things can be changed

Dynamic model:

Performance (success/failure) -> feelings (positive/negative) -> attributions -> specific emotions (e.g. pride) -> expectations ->…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is attributional retraining?

A

People are encouraged to make more optimistic attributions

Outcomes are controllable

Success attributed to internal causes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does Parker et al. (2018) support attributional retraining?

A

University athletes prone to difficult transition from school

RCT = attributional training or waitlist control

Attributional training = better grades explained by increased perceived academic control

When people believed outcomes were under their control (internal), increased motivation

Used in clinical practices e.g. CBT

19
Q

Who came up with the correspondent interference theory?

A

Jones and Davis (1965)

20
Q

Describe the correspondent interference theory

A

Whether behaviour reflects an internally driven behaviour (intentional)

Act freely chosen

Non-common effect = effect of behaviour unusual compared to other behaviours

(Not) Socially desirable = more likely to be produced by situation

Hedonic relevance

Personalism = whether behaviour designed to affect you e.g. positive consequences

But: overly focused on internal attribution

21
Q

Who came up with the covariation model?

A

Kelley (1967)

22
Q

Describe the covariation model

A

Use multiple observations to try and identify factors that co-vary with behaviour (more scientific)

Assign causal role to the factor(s)

Whether behaviour is internal or external is key

Look for 3 bits of information

23
Q

What is constistency?

A

Does this behaviour always co-occur with the cause?

Low (e.g. never failed before after nights out) -> discounting – look for different cause

High (always fail if go out night before) -> these are linked

24
Q

What is distinctiveness?

A

Is the behaviour exclusively linked to this cause or is it a common reaction?

High (e.g. I never failed other exams) -> attribute to external cause

Low (e.g. I generally fail exams) -> internal attribution

25
What is consensus?
Do other people react in the same way to the cause/situation? High - strengthens attribution to external cause (e.g. realise not to drink before exam) Low - internal attribution (e.g. may just affect me in an adverse way)
26
How does the covariation model relate to mental health?
People with depression attribute negative events to internal, global and stable causes (Abramson et al., 1989) E.g. “I failed because I am stupid” = internal attribution Key aspect Psychotherapy – stop explaining events in an overly pessimistic, self-defeating way (Ebeck et al., 1979)
27
What are some critiques of the covariation model?
BUT: Covariation really used? Salience of prior info? – maybe focus on information that stands out/obvious Empirical evidence suggests that we are actually quite poor at assessing covariation Covariation = Correlation ≠ Causation! Are we really all information seekers and rational scientists?
28
What are attribution biases?
Systematic errors indicative of shortcuts, gut feeling, intuition
29
What is false consensus?
Use our opinions as representative of others How common is your opinion?
30
How does Ross et al. (1977) support false consensus?
Asked students would you walk around campus to advertise cafeteria and if other people would do it Yes = 62% think others will also say yes No = 67% think others will also say no
31
What is the explanation behind the false consensus?
Seek out similar others to hang out with which gives us a biased view of the world, salience of own opinion (our opinions stand out), self-esteem maintenance (like to validate our own behaviours) People with extreme views often overestimate others who have similar views e.g. vaccines cause autism (Rabinowitz et al., 2016)
32
What is the fundamental attribution error?
Tendency to attribute behaviour to enduring dispositions rather than situations (even when clear situational causes)
33
How did Ross et al. (1977) support the fundamental attribution error?
Assigned some to knowledgeable quiz master role and some to contestant Other audience still watching Rated quiz master as more knowledgeable Clear situational cues but people still think behaviour is internal/dispositional
34
What is the explanation behind the fundamental attribution error?
Focus of attention/saliency effect Target most salient -> internal attribution most accessible More likely to forget situational causes -> dispositional shift Also known as correspondence bias (children don’t demonstrate this bias and we don’t find it in the same strength across cultures)
35
What is actor-observer bias?
Extension of fundamental attribution error More likely to make situational attributions for our behaviour and dispositional to others Internal for others, external for yourself
36
How did Jones and Nisbett (1972) support actor-observer bias?
A shop assistant it rude to you They are a rude person (internal) You are rude to a shop assistant You are simply stressed (external)
37
What is the explanation behind actor-observer bias?
Perceptual focus, informational difference (got more information about ourselves)
38
What are moderators?
Positive behaviour makes dispositional more likely, perspective taking reverses effect (put yourself in their position reduces dispositional attribution and increases understanding of the situation)
39
What is self-serving bias (Olson & Ross, 1988)
Success = internal Failure = external E.g. Kingdon (1976) – self-serving bias in American politicians
40
What is the explanation behind self-serving bias?
Expectations and self-esteem Motivational: maintenance of self-esteem (split into self-enhancing and self-protecting bias) Cognitive: intend/expect to succeed -> attribute internal causes to expected events Operates at a group level too (e.g. football wins/losses)
41
What are cognitive shortcuts?
Avoid effort, resources expenditure Rule of thumb, not complex mental judgement Quick and easy E.g. which are deadlier – sharks or horses? – most people are more scared of sharks but it is horses (shark deaths are more salient)
42
What is the availability heuristic?
Judge frequency or probability of events by how easy it is to think of examples (memory accessibility)
43
What is the representative heuristic?
Categorise based on similarity between instance and prototypical category members Allocate a set of attributes E.g. may judge new outbreak of a disease compared to covid because its familiar and in that category
44
What is the anchoring and adjustment heuristic?
Make a judgement based on a starting point (or initial standard) influences subsequent judgements, even if its an arbitrary starting point