demonic era
pre-1600
criminal and abnormal behaviour was thought to be caused by demons, evil spirits, or an indeterminate “force or evil”
trepanation
holes drilled into the skull to release demons from the inflicted soul
magna carta
the great charter
the foundation of modern laws (the foundations of civil liberties for all citizens)
the enlightenment
the age of reason
occurring in the late 1600 and early 1700, establishes ideas of legal authority and limits of state power and punishment
hobbes on human behaviour
the first principle of human behaviour is egoism or self-interest, which is the root of all social conflict
you must surrender all your natural rights to the state to have protection
locke on human behaviour
challenged conventional wisdom assuming people were born blank slates.’
- nurture, not nature, is the primary force that shapes human personality
must surrender some of your natural rights to the state to have protection
rationalism
the idea that people are self-determining entities
- free will and rational thought were deemed the basic building blocks of human activity
classical school of criminology
beccaria and bentham
argued that the law needs to be clear and well written- and that punishment is only justified if it prevents other crime (deterrence rather than punishment)
criticisms of the classical school
it can only operate in a society where property is equally distributed, the question of criminal responsibility, no consideration for mitigating circumstances
neoclassical school of criminology
considered the physical and social environment in which crime takes place
- the offender’s past record
- issues of mental illness
positivist school of thought
emerged in the 19th century
human behaviour was determined by forced beyond the control of the individual
early positivist thinking
social darwinism
belief in the theory of natural selection
lombroso’s theory
founded on social darwinism
criminals were biologically atavists or throwbacks - those who had primitive features (physically) were predisposed to crime
critiques: state of atavism does not exist, and physical attributes may have been observed as a result of their incarceration
rushton’s theory
proposed a theory accounting for racial differences in crime
that different races have different IQs (a direct function of difference in brain size)
criticisms: race as a social construct, crime rates vary within racial groups
sheldon’s theory
developed a typology of three different body shapes with distinctive temperaments
sociobiological explanations
human behaviour can be explained according to evolutionary principles
certain individuals have a predisposition towards criminality
psychological theories
modern psychological explanations about crime contend that criminals are made; interacting with the social environment is key
freud’s psychoanalytic theory
id: primal urges, unconscious biological drives
ego: reality principle, keeps id urges in check
superego: social conscience / moral code
psychopath
a person who lacks guilt, remorse and is unable to hold lasting bonds with others
also known as anti-social personality disorder
emile durkheim
considered the founder of sociology and his work on crime and deviance continues to impact criminological theories
Criticism: durkheim did not pay attention to how suicide stats were collected and interpreted
social disorganization
shaw and mckay argued that crime and juvenile delinquency were not randomly distributed
they are caused by the types of neighbourhoods in which youth grew up
anomie (normlessness)
the way societies are organized can bring strain on individuals that can lead to rule-breaking behaviour
five modes of strain
conformity, innovation, retreatism, ritualism and rebellion
social bond theory
most people are risk takers, but their bonds to society help them follow the rules/law
4 components: attachment, commitments, involvement and beliefs