Lecture Week 7 Flashcards
(18 cards)
Terrorism
The use of violence by an organization other than a national government to intimidate or frighten a target audience
Radical/fanatic/fundamentalist/extremist
These are normative labels. One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter
Salafi-jihadi
This is a contentious term
-Salafi = belief. Living like the first generation of muslims
- Jihadi- method. Struggle, legitimizing violence, neotraditional
Insurgent, non-state armed actor, rebel
Why are jihadi hard to study?
- its not unique
- its about a ideology
- dangerous fieldwork
- extremely diverse actors
What are the root ideas of the Jihad?
- context of colonialsm, imperialism and questioning the islam’s role
Early Jihadi movements in the 1960-80s
Context: newly independent nations, cold war and dictators
Goals: political and social change at home
Tactics: terror, targetted violence and preaching, social movements
Academic approach
Afghan-Soviet war (1979-89)
CONTEXT: Cold War, + important events in muslim nations
GOALS: defending Islamic world
TACTICS: Guerrilla warfare
ACADEMIC APPROACH :
Noble mujahideen, imperialism…
Global Jihad
CONTEXT: American empire, neoliberalism, globalization
GOALS: Targetting West, for local end-objectives
TACTICS: Terrorism as war, franchising
ACADEMIC APPROACH : End of history / Clash of civilizations / New Wars.
aims, financing, mobilisation…
Post 9/11
ACADEMIC APPROACH :
Terrorism studies/”jihadology”. Security as starting point
Lumping together
Assumptions on identity (primordialism/instrumentalism)
Refusal to look at historical roots / political aspects
ISIS
STRUCTURE: Trauma of Iraq & US imperialism
GOALS: Globally defending the local ‘islamic state’
TACTICS: governance & terrorism & media jihad
SCHOLARSHIP: media studies, governance (tentative).
Boom of “jihadology” and Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE)
At home (deradicalization)
Global South: humanitarian/peace/development NEXUS. (impact Trump?)
Main issues in the study of jihad
Politicized knowledge
Dogmatic / Taboos
Top-down / North-South
Epistemology
Opportunities:
NEEDED: critical analyses
Inter-disciplinary approach
Common applied perspectives: identity framing
Identity-framing (race; herder/farmer…)
Critique: identity as a social construct (but still felt & used)
Common applied perspectives: Greed
(war economy, extractivism, narco-jihadis…)
Critique: financial gains = means
+ complex motivations (not just
rational actors)
Commonly applied perspectives: terrorism studies
lumping”
Critique: local specificity
diversity of jihadis
Commonly applied perspectives: Proxy wars
France/West vs Russia
Critique: agency!
Commonly applied perspectives: New Barbarism
New barbarism’: barbarity, irrationality of Global South
Critique: legitimizer of intervention + violence bias
The lecturers research in Mali
She looked at the margins to observe transformation. She did interviews with non-combattants talking about everyday life and concerns. She collaborated with Malian researchers. But she had some difficulties due to security, taboos, shorter stays and decolonizing.