Medical Ethics Flashcards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vn4_4GBDSJ4 (47 cards)
Medical Ethics
What are the four bedrock principles of medical ethics?
Autonomy
Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
Justice
Medical Ethics
Assuming a patient has full decision-making capacity, what is the ethical difference between withholding life-saving care that the patient has refused and removing life-saving care that the patient has requested be discontinued?
There is no ethical difference between withholding and removing life-saving treatment.
(Patient autonomy is paramount.)
Medical Ethics
What are the three main components of the hierarchy of substitute decision makers in cases of medical care?
- Legally appointed SDMs
- Automatic family member SDMS
- SDM of last resort

Medical Ethics
Describe the hierarchy of substitute decision makers who are legally appointed in cases of medical care.
(Yellow category)

Medical Ethics
Describe the family hierarchy of substitute decision makers in cases of medical care.
(Green category)

Medical Ethics
In what order do parents, children, spouses, and siblings fit into the hierarchy of substitute decision makers (in terms of medical care)?
Spouse >
Parents or children >
Siblings
Medical Ethics
Describe the last resort in the hierarchy of substitute decision makers in cases of medical care.
(Blue category)

Medical Ethics
What is palliative sedation (as an alternative to euthanasia)?
Prescribing high doses of opiates or other medications to the point of producing unconsciousness in order to treat refractory physical pain
Medical Ethics
The doctrine of double effect distinguishes effects that are intended from those that are foreseen but unintended.
What is an example of this?
Opiates are used to relieve pain, but they also have the side effect of causing respiratory depression and hastening death
Medical Ethics
What are some basics regarding medical disputes over minors?

Medical Ethics
How would you describe the difference between medical negligence and battery?

Medical Ethics
Can a patient’s next of kin override their living will?
No. Only the patient can modify the living will.
Medical Ethics
What is the difference between consent and assent?
- Assent is the non-legal affirmation that children must give.
- Consent is the legal affirmation that parents, legal guardians, and emancipated minors give.

Medical Ethics
In what situations should a physician treat a minor without parental consent?
Emancipated minors; treatment for STDs, substance abuse, birth control, and emergency situations
Medical Ethics
Depressed patients who are suicidal and want to withdraw treatment should not have their wishes honored until this happens (2):
1) Assessment of competence
2) No honoring of decisions until depression resolves
Medical Ethics
What should a physician do if a patient makes sexual advances?
Should a physician have sexual or romantic relationships with past patients?
Immediately terminate the doctor-patient relationship.
No (the power differential is too large).
Medical Ethics
How long must a physician continue to provide treatment after termination of the doctor-patient relationship?
30 days (So the patient has time to find a new provider)
Medical Ethics
Case 1

D
- Personal diagnoses are not to be divulged (Even to partners) against the patient’s will.
- Certain diseases must be reported to the CDC:
Hepatitis A, B, C;
HIV, AIDS;
Syphilis, gonorrhea;
MMR;
TB;
Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli;
Varicella;
Meningitis.
Medical Ethics
Case 2

C
The first step in controversial, difficult situations is to attempt to understand the alternate party’s point of view.

Medical Ethics
Case 3

E
- As a parent, this patient is an emancipated minor that can consent to her own treatments and make her own decisions.

Medical Ethics
Case 4

A
- The mother has full control and precedence over the child.
Medical Ethics
Case 5

A
- HIPPA - “I am not allowed to say whether or not…”
Medical Ethics
Case 6

D
- Gifts should always be refused.
Medical Ethics
Case 7

B
- The physician failed to obtain informed consent.
No words were exchanged, no benefits or risks were explained, and no alternative options given.
- There were no damages due to a breach of duty; so, there is no case of negligence here.


























