memory Flashcards
(187 cards)
define short term memory?
the limited capacity memory store
define long term memory?
the permanent capacity memory store
What is a Memory Model?
A memory model tries to develop a theoretical picture of how our memories work
What is the earliest Model of Memory?
The Multi-store model - Proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968)
Define coding?
the format in which information is coded (how it’s changed and stored) in memory stores
Define capacity?
the amount of information that can be stored in memory stores
Define duration?
the amount of time information can be witheld in certain memory stores
KEY STUDY: BADDELEY (1966)
What was his aim?
To explore the effects of acoustic and semantic encoding in STM and LTM.
Describe Baddeley’s key study on memory?
- there 4 groups shown groups of word lists to remember
- G1- acoustically similar words G2- acoustically dissimilar words G3- semantically similar words (words with similar meaning) G4- semantically dissimilar words (words with different meaning)
- they had to recall the words straight away in the correct order and then 20 mins later
What was Baddeley’s results?
STM recall was worse for G1 and LTM was worse for G3.
when they did the task immediately, recalling from short-term memory, they tended to do worse with acoustically similar words. When they recalled the word list after a time interval of 20 minutes, recalling from Long-term memory, they did worse with semantically similar words
Baddeley’s conclusion?
His results showed that STM is coded acoustically because STM recall was confused by acoustically similar words and
LTM is coded semantically as LTM recall was confused by semantically similar words
Strength of Baddeley’s study?
- Identified CLEAR DIFERENCE BETWEEN 2 MEMORY STORES - important to understanding of memory system - development of MSM
- he identified a clear difference between the 2 memory stores
- later research showed that there was some exceptions to Baddeley’s findings
- But the idea that STM is mostly acoustically coded and LTM is semantically coded has stood the test of time
- Was an important step in understanding the memory system, led to the discover of the MSM of memory
Weakness of Baddeley’s Study?
- LACKS ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - stimuli is ARTIFICAL - does not reflect everyday memory tasks.
- lacks ecological validity
- stimuli is artificial, the word lists had no personal meaning to participants
- The world list may not tell us about coding in different kinds of memory tasks, especially in everyday life
- for example when processing more useful information people may use semantic coding even for STM tasks
- therefore findings from this study had limited application
KEY STUDY: JACOBS (1887) AND MILLER (1956)
what was their aim?
To investigate the capacity of short term memory
Describe the method Miller (1956) and Jacobs (1887) used to investigate capacity of STM?
Jacobs -> Investigated how much information short term memory store can hold using a digits span. The researcher would read aloud 4 letters/numbers at a time and increase after 4, and the participant would repeat each letter/word until they could no longer remember the order.
miller-> He found out that organising in chunks enabled STM to cope with about 7+/-2 chunks. He found out that we chunk up information in order to remember it more successfully.
Describe how both Jacobs and Miller’s studies are interlinked?
Jacob found an average span of 7.3 letters and 9.3 words which supports millers notion 7+/-2.
Weakness of Jacobs research?
-LACK OF STANDARDISATION AND APPRECIATION OF SCIENTIFIC METHODS- confounding variables = not controlled efficiently
— A key issue with historical psychological research, particularly concerning Jacobs, is the lack of standardisation and appreciation of scientific methods. For example, the current laboratory experiment methodology produces highly reliable and valid data through controlling and so removing the effects of extraneous and confounding variables. The same is unlikely to be said of Jacobs, where confounding variables such as a noisy room or difficult word lists, may have had a greater influence on accuracy of recall, leading to unreliable results.
A Strength of Jacobs study:
-Replicated - findings = confirmed - thus his research is valid
Has been replicated, even though the study lacked adequate controls, and the results/findings have been confirmed by better controlled studies. Suggesting that His test was valid in testing digit span in STM.
Weakness of millers research:
1- Miller overestimated the capacity of STM
2- Cannot conclude exact capacity and he did not take into consideration other factors that could effect capacity
- One limitation of STM is that he may have overestimated STM capacity. Cowan (2001) reviewed other research and concluded that capacity of STM is only about 4+/-1 chunks. This may reflect the outdated methodologies adopted by Miller and specifically, the lack of control over confounding variables which may have contributed to this inaccurate estimate.
- millers research did not specify how large each chunk could be therefore we are unable to conclude the exact capacity.
- also he did not take into consideration other factors which could effect the capacity of STM e.g age
duration of long term memory?
thought to be limitless even if we cant recall everything
KEY STUDY: PETERSON AND PETERSON (1959)
how long STM lasts when rehearsal is prevented
Describe the method used by Peterson and Peterson (1959)
- 24 male and female participants shown consonant trigrams (e.g JBW) and were told to memorise it
- They then were given a 3 digit number and told to count back from that number in 3s until they were told to stop, this prevented any mental rehearsal of the trigram by the participant
- On each trial they were told to stop after varying periods of time. (3-18 seconds)
What did Peterson and Peterson (1959) find?
longer the interval, the less accurate the recall
after 3 seconds trigram recalled successfully
after 18 seconds only 10% recalled trigrams successfully. so STM duration is approx. 18 seconds
What did Peterson and Peterson (1959) conclude?
STM has a duration of approximately 18 seconds. Furthermore, if we are unable to rehearse information, it will not be passed to LTM, providing further support for the MSM and the idea of discrete components