Psychopathology Flashcards
(132 cards)
What is psychopathology?
The study of mental illnesses
How can we decide if a persons behaviour or psychological state are sufficiently unusual to justify diagnosing and treating them?
Definitions:
1. Deviation from social norms
2. Statistical infrequency
3. Failure to function adequately
4. Deviation from ideal mental health
What ids meant by deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality?
A person is seen as abnormal if a persons behaviour or thinking violates unwritten rules (social norms) about what is acceptable in society.
Give an example of deviation from social norms
Running around naked -
Limitations for deviation from social norms:
1- Cultural relativism - social norms differ between cultures
2- Relies on the context of behaviour - may not be abnormal but deviant behaviour.
One issue with the deviation from social norms as a definition for abnormality is that social norms are culturally relative/specific to a certain culture. This is because social norms differ between different cultures and different things are considered normal and in other countries abnormal. For example drinking alcohol in Saudi vs the uk. therefore this is a limitation as our perception of abnormality/social norms must be adapted to specific cultures.
Another issue of this definition is that it relies on the context of the behaviour .if someone breaks a social norm this may not be deviant behaviour but only in certain situations this may be considered evidence of psychological disturbance. For example shouting in a football match but then shouting in public. This could possibly be an indication of a underlying health condition. As a consequence this definition fails to offer an alternative explanation related to degree and context of one’s behaviour
Another issue is that overtime social norms change so things that were seen as deviant before may not bee seen as deviant now for example homosexuality was illegal until1973.
Strength for deviation from social norms
1- Keeps society orderly
Strength = can keep society orderly. This means that social norms in society inform people of what to do and what not do do - what is acceptable therefore maintaining Oder in scoiety by preventing chaos and dysfunction n
What is meant by statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality?
A mathematical way of testing abnormality by looking at someone’s behaviour to see if its statistically uncommon or common.
Give an example of statistical infrequency
Average IQ can be represented on a normal distribution. If two standard deviations away from the mean then you are considered abnormal. so this is behaviour that is not seen very often.
Weakness of statistical infrequency:
1- Could lead to labelling
2- Statistically infrequent behaviour = labelled as abnormal could in fact be desirable characteristics
One problem of this definition of abnormality is that it could be an invite to labelling. This is because statistical infrequency can label individuals as abnormal which could be hinder our to an individuals life. For example those with a low IQ could face discrimination based upon the definition and set drawbacks in their life such as poor self-image etc
Another problem with this definition for abnormality is that statistically infrequent behaviours labelled as abnormal could in fact be desirable traits. for example a high IQ would be unusual yet be hugely celebrated so called genius those without this desirable trait would be seen as less. therefore has a negative impact on society.
evaluation (strengths) for statistical infrequency?
1- Real world Application
one strength of statistical infrequency is that it has real world application as it can be used in clinicians to diagnose a patient. for example intellectual disability we can measure the IQ of an individual if its below for example 60 it could justify their need for help
what is meant by failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality?
a person is considered abnormal when they are unable to cope with demands of everyday life and live independently in society. Their behaviour also causes stress and discomfort to family and friends
how to know if someone lies upon the definition of failure to function adequately according to Rosenhan and Seligman (1989)?
the global assessmment of functional scale:
unpredictability - impulsive, uncontrollable
maldaptiveness - going against acceptable standards
personal distress - excessive emotional responses
irrationality - unreasonable thinking/impulses
observer discomfort - to others
Weakness for failure to function adequately:
1- Individual Differences play a role
2- Confusing distinguishing failure to function adequately and deviation form social norms.
one limitation of this definition is that individual differences play a role. for example a person with OCD may exhibit rituals that may prevent them from functioning adequately, as they constantly miss work or school whereas another person may suffer from the same excessive rituals but find time to complete and come on time to work. therefore we need to take into account how individual differences.
another limitation of this definition is that it can often be confusing when distinguishing between failure to function adequately and deviation from social norms. For example, a behaviour which appears to be failure to function adequately, such as not being able to go to work, may in fact be a deviation from the social norm should that person be choosing to live an alternative lifestyle out of the common system for that society. It is therefore difficult to ascertain if this behaviour should be considered maladaptive. By labelling individuals who make such choices as ‘failing’, personal freedom is being squashed.
evaluation (strengths) foir failure to function adequately?
one strength of failure to function adequately is that it considers the subjective personal experiences of the partient. this definition considers the thoughts and feelings of the person experiencing the issue and does not simply make a judgement withought taking the personal viewpoint of the sufferer into consideration. this suggests that failure to function adequately ia auseful model for assessing psychopathological behaviour.
One strength of failure to function criterion is that it represents a sensible threshold for when people need profession help. Most of us have symptoms of mental disorders to some degree ant some time. Factually, around 25% of people in the Uk will experience mental health problems in any given year. People can be referred for help by others or notice themselves. This means that the treatment and services can be targeted to those who need them.
what is mneant by deviation from ideal mental health as a definition for abnormality?
Jahoda (1958) suggested that abnormnal behaviour is defined when there is an abscence of particular and ideal characteristics. so behqaviours which move away from ideal mental health.
what are the 6 principles of ideal mental health?
- having a high self-esteem and strong sence of identity
- capable of person growth and self-actualisation
- being independent of others and self-regulatiung
- having an accurate view of reality
- being able to integrate and resist stress
- being able to master your environment
eva;uation (weaknesses) of deviation from ifdeal mental health as a definition for abnormality?
one ;limitation of this definition is that the criteria is unrealistic as proposed by Jahoda. this is because at times everyone will experience stress and negativity for once in their life for examploe when a loved one passes away. however when we put this definition into this context the individual would be considered abnormal irrespective of the circumstances out of their control. therefore a weakness of this definition as a defintion for abnormality as it has set too much of a high stabndard and does not tkae into account little or major setbacks which infintely have an impact on anyones life.
another issue with this definition for explaining abnormality is that cultural relativism. Jahoda does not take intoi accountb how this definitiuon may differ in certain coun tries. for example personal growth may be seen as overly self-centered in countries which favour collectivist ideas. thus this definition is culture bound.
another issue with this definition it that mental illnesses could have an effect on whether or not an individual is able to cover this criteria. for example those with schizophrenia will struggle to form an accurate view of reality.
evaluation (strengths) of devioatioon from ideal mental health as a definition for abnormality?
one strength of Jahoda’s definition is that it takes a positive approach in defining abnormality rather than considering the negative and undesirable behaviours. this could help aid a persons’s determination to become and to strive to become a beter person. Also this takes into account multiple factors that can affect an individuals health and wellbeing. So thius shows that the defintion of ideal mental health is comprehensive and covers a broad range of criteria.
phobias
what is a phobia?
a phobia is an anxiety disorder which causes an irrational fear of a particular object or situation
what are the 3 categories of phobias?
- simple (specific) phobias
- social phobias
- Agorophobia
what is a simple phobias?
this is the most common type of phobia and this is where a person fears a specific object
simple phobias are then divided into a further 4 categories what are they?
- animal, injury, situational, natural
what is a social phobia?
social phobias involve feelings of anxiety in social situations