methods: case studies of brain-damaged patients and the use of qualitative data Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

what is the case study research method?

A
  • gathers in-depth and detailed data
  • uses many data sources
  • combines different research methods
  • examples: interviews, questionnaires, observations, case history (like a patient)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what type of data do case studies gather and how?

A
  • mainly gathers qualitative data for depth and detail
  • can also include quantitative data if tests/experiments are used
  • example: IQ test for quantitative data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is one way of using different research methods in case study?

A
  • triangulation
  • involves using different research methods (e.g. observation and interview)
  • helps develop themes from gathered data
  • if data from different sources are similar, they reinforce each other
  • increases reliability of the findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who was henry molaison (hm) and what happened to him?

A
  • suffered brain injury from surgery to treat epileptic seizures
  • lost memory during surgery in August 1953 at age 27
  • operation performed by William Scoville who removed HM’s hippocampus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the effects of hm’s surgery and how was it studied?

A
  • surgery reduced seizures but caused severe memory loss
  • referred to wilder penfield and brenda milner for assessment
  • hippocampus is key for consolidating memories, so its removal was devastating
  • hm became ideal amnesia case: injury was localised, personality and intelligence stayed intact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what types of amnesia did hm have and what were the effects?

A
  • had anterograde amnesia: couldn’t make new memories after surgery
  • had retrograde amnesia: couldn’t recall some past events before surgery
  • couldn’t remember new names, faces, events or information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was unusual about hm’s ability to learn after surgery?

A
  • could learn new skills
  • had no memory of learning or doing them
  • showed that procedural memory was still working despite amnesia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how did hm’s retrograde amnesia affect his memory?

A
  • couldn’t recall memories from 19 months to 11 years before surgery
  • at age 27, could only remember some events after age 16, almost none after 25
  • retrograde amnesia may be linked to epilepsy medication and seizures, not just surgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did hm contribute to psychological research during and after his life?

A
  • took part in many interviews giving qualitative data on memory and cognition
  • helped show which cognitive functions were intact or impaired
  • after death, his brain was donated to research
  • brain was cut into over 2000 segments at the brain observatory in San Diego
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what happened to hm during surgery and what were the effects?

A
  • had severe epilepsy, surgery removed two-thirds of hippocampus
  • only 2cm left, but it was non-functional
  • epilepsy cured, but lost ability to make new episodic memories
  • couldn’t live independently
  • could learn new motor skills (procedural memory still worked)
  • studied extensively throughout his life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does hm’s case tell us about memory systems?

A
  • supports idea that stm and ltm are separate (from multi-store model)
  • shows ltm has different types: semantic, episodic, procedural
  • episodic memory needs hippocampus, but procedural does not
  • proves msm is too simple – ltm isn’t just one store
  • hm could retrieve old memories, showing encoding and retrieval use different brain areas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

who was kf and what happened to him?

A
  • Shallice and Warrington
  • had motorbike accident at age 17, surgery caused brain damage
  • damage in left parietal-occipital cortex
  • developed epilepsy at age 19
  • at age 28, tested with overall iq 113, but verbal iq 79
  • good memory for daily and past events
  • couldn’t repeat verbal info, digit span only 1
  • visual info (like numbers/letters) easier, digit span 3–4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does kf’s case tell us about stm and memory models?

A
  • supports that stm and ltm are separate (from multi-store model)
  • shows there are at least two types of stm: verbal and visual
  • msm is too simple, only shows one stm store
  • supports working memory model by baddeley and hitch
  • stm has phonological loop (verbal) and visuo-spatial sketchpad (visual)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

who was cw and what does his case show about memory?

A
  • had severe brain infection causing damage to the hippocampus
  • completely unable to form new memories, memory lasts only 30 seconds
  • no memory of life before brain damage, except his love for his second wife
  • can play piano, showing procedural memory is intact
  • can learn new skills and some facts through procedural memory
  • example: could anticipate film content after watching without remembering it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what does cw’s case show about memory systems?

A
  • supports STM and LTM being separate (from multi-store model)
  • cw has only STM, like HM, cannot form new LTMs
  • cw has no LTM from before illness, showing more extensive brain damage
  • hippocampus encodes episodic memory, but procedural is not affected
  • semantic memory can survive damage to hippocampus and cortex
  • shows MSM is too simple, LTM isn’t just one store
  • emotional memories separate from episodic and can stay intact after hippocampus damage
  • emotional memories may be linked to deeper structures like the amygdala
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the strengths of using case studies in research?

A
  • useful for studying rare human behaviours or experiences (e.g. mental illness, brain damage)
    • can investigate cases that can’t be recreated in a lab
  • provides rich, in-depth data due to the complex interaction of many factors
    • allows research into factors that might be overlooked in experiments with controlled variables
    • important for psychologists using a holistic approach to understanding behavior
17
Q

what are the weaknesses of using case studies in research?

A
  • difficult to generalise due to unique characteristics of each case and lack of before and after comparisons
  • often relies on recollection of past events, which can be unreliable due to inaccurate memories
  • researchers may lack objectivity, influenced by familiarity with the case or theoretical biases
  • ethical issues like confidentiality and anonymity; unique cases are often easily identifiable even without real names
18
Q

how does memory research differ in case studies compared to other types of research?

A
  • memory research in cognitive psychology is often quantitative
  • case studies of brain-damaged patients typically provide qualitative data
  • describes intact or lost functions due to amnesia
  • helps understand the subjective experiences of patients
19
Q

what are the advantages and disadvantages of qualitative data in psychology?

A
  • advantage: provides detailed accounts of a person’s experiences, feelings, and beliefs
  • some argue it is the essence of psychology
  • disadvantage: can lack objectivity because it requires interpretation, which may be biased
20
Q

how does qualitative research differ from quantitative research?

A
  • qualitative research is not straightforward or mechanistic
  • quantitative research follows a step-by-step procedure leading to data analysis
  • qualitative research is defined by the nature of the investigation and choices made by the researcher
  • involves making meaning from ppt responses, open to individual interpretation by the researcher
21
Q

what is the process of analysing qualitative data and its potential limitations?

A
  • researcher establishes themes that emerge from the discourse
  • applies meaning to the content and reaches subjective conclusions
  • emergent themes are not invalid, but must be explained and justified with evidence from the discourse
  • conclusions are subjective, relying on the researcher’s interpretation
22
Q

how does qualitative research differ from the hypothetico-deductive model and what methods are used?

A
  • qualitative research is inductive, starting with a research question and developing answers through careful decoding of information
  • doesn’t follow the hypothetico-deductive model (theory → test)
  • data gathered using methods like unstructured/some-structured interviews, open-ended questionnaires, group discussions, speech analysis, and literature reviews
  • non-numerical data is transcribed and notes are taken on emerging themes
  • no single type of qualitative research or analysis, but general format is similar across studies
23
Q

what is the main aim of qualitative research and what does it reveal?

A
  • aims to understand how individuals make sense of their own experiences
  • focuses on how people perceive their world and the meanings they attach to it
  • results in rich descriptions of how people disclose personal information
  • explores the connections between events and feelings they associate with them
24
Q

what does it mean that qualitative data is idiographic and how is it typically used?

A
  • qualitative data is idiographic, meaning it focuses on individuals rather than generalizing to others
  • results are specific and unique to the individual involved
  • while some research may claim themes are generalisable, qualitative studies often use small sample sizes
  • research is typically built up into a case study
25
how is qualitative data analysed after it is gathered?
- **transcriptions** are made of the participant’s **discourse** - researcher **immerses** in the text, making notes on **feelings, beliefs, and meanings** - notes are **reflected on** and checked against the transcript - **emerging themes** are developed from the notes - themes are presented as **conclusions** with **quotes** from the transcript to support them
26
what are the strengths of qualitative analysis in psychology?
- gathers **rich descriptions** based on **meaning**, often missed by **quantitative methods** - goes beyond description to **understand, connect, and theorise** about emerging themes - helps explore **deep beliefs and feelings** that can’t be captured by questionnaires - especially useful in **health and clinical psychology** - helps understand how **patients experience palliative care** or what **caregivers** believe would help them
27
what are the weaknesses of qualitative analysis?
- can be **laborious** and **time-consuming** - **transcription** takes a lot of time - lacks a **standardised format** - often criticised as **unscientific and highly subjective** - seen by some as more **descriptive** than **explanatory**