Midterm 1 - reading Flashcards

(144 cards)

1
Q

name the three broad themes we care about so far

A

processing principles
motivational principles
general axioms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are processing principles and name them

A

processing - thinking, cognitions; how we take in and deal with information

  • conservatism
  • accessinility
  • superficiality vs depth of processing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is conservatism

A

a persons thoughts, beliefs, and opinons are slow to change and tend to perpetuate themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is accessibility

A

information that is most accessible generally has the most impact on thoughts, feelings and behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is superficiality vs depth of processing

A

people typically put little effort into dealing with infromation, but at times are motivated and/or able to consider information more in depth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are motivational principles and name them

A

motivation - what drives people to think, feel and act

  • need to feel good about ourselves and what is ours (people want to see themselves and things connected to themselves in a positive light
  • Need to be accurate and to understand and make sense of the world; strive for mastery: we seek to understand and predict events in the social world around us in order to obtain rewards and a sense of control; we need to know
  • Need to seek connectedness: people seek support, liking, and acceptance from people and groups they care about and value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

name the three general axioms

A

interaction of the person and the situation
social influence is very persuasive
we construct / construe our own reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain interaction of the person and situaiton

A

both an individual’s personality/internal characteristics and environment/situational characteristics interact to influence feelings, thoughts, and behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain social influence is very pervasive

A

people influence virtually all of our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, whether these people are present or not, real or imagined, or whether or not we are aware of their influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

we construct / construe our own reality

A

ach person’s view of reality is a subjective, unique construction, shaped both by cognitive processes (the ways our minds work) and social processes (input from others either actually present or imagined); the world looks different from someone else’s eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define social psychology

A

the scientific study of the feelings, thoughts and behaviours of individuals in social situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Abu Ghraib

A

Iraqi prisoner mistreatedment by american soldiers
torture and sexual abuse
30 years previous = zimbardo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who is jurt lewin

A

founder of modern social pscy
jewish berliner, fled nazi germany
behaviour of people like objects is a function of the field of forces in which they find themselves (in humans force = social situation, persons attributes are important but they always interact with the situation to produce the resulting behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain Zimbardo

A

24 Stanford undergrad men - good character and mental health
random assignment to prisoner or guard
study ended after 6 days as went too brutal
balance of power so unequal, prison = brutal unless guards observe strict regs curbing their worst impulses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Milgram

A

learning and memory at yale (first done on just men then replicated with women)
participant = teacher administering shocks for mistakes, confederate = pupill recieving shocks
participant shocked way beyond safe levels
Teacher felt 45 v so knew it hurt but was told wasn’t causing any lasting damage
was egged on by experimenter who said he had to continue
key quesiton - why people conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

shock levels in milgram

A

80% past 150 v (heart problem and screamed let me out)
62.5% past 450 v (the whole way)
average = 360 v (learner had let out an agonised scream and had become hysterical0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what did milgram claim was key as to why people confromed

A

the step by step nature

if did 200 v then why not administer 225 v etc then suddenly we are at 450 v and we haven’t stopped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

seminarians vs samaritans experiment

A

seminarians only stopped to help a man groaning, coughing and in need of help if they weren’t in a rush
- had just been reminded of their faith!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what factors govern people most

A

situational (in a hurry or under pressure) > internal (kind of person someone is)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

define dispositions

A

internal factors such as beliefs, values, personality traits, and abilities, that guide a persons behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

define fundamental attribution error

A

the failure to recognize the importance of situational influences on behaviour, along with the corresponding tendency to overemphasise the importance of dispositions on behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what are channel factors and the study about it (healthcare)

A

nudges
preventative helthcare - get yale students to get a tetnus shot
read scary material or
others got a map with health centre circled and asked to review their schedule for a convinient time
the map approach worked way better - used in obama campaign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

define gestalt psych

A

form or figure
an approach that stresses the fact that people perceive objects not by means of some sutomatic registering device but by active, usually nonconscious interpretation of what the object represented as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

define construal

A

ones interpretation of or inference about the stimuli or situations that one confronts`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
define schemas
a knowledge structure consisting of any organized body of stored information that is used to help in understanding events
26
define stereotype
a belief that certain attributed are characteristic of members of a particular group
27
automatic vs controled processing overview
automatic - nonconscious often based on emotional factors | controlled - conscious and systematic and more likely to be controlled by deliberative thought
28
what kinds of attitudes does automatic processing lead to
implicit | beliefs that cant readily be controlled by the mind
29
what kinds of attitudes does controlled processing lead to
explicit
30
what is ideomotor mimicry
we change our body position to match the person we are conversing with
31
some studies showing automatic processing controlling our behaviour
will rate last pari of stockings as the best hostile and non hostile words then is donald hostile or not when surrounded by greenery people are less aggressive than red read persusive stuff in a fishy smelling room = more likley to find it fishy body mimicing
32
why we use noncontrolled processing
conscious processing runs serially step by step = slow | automatic runs in parallel = faster
33
implication of nonconscious processing in social psych research
must craft experiments to isolate the true causes of peoples behaviour - cannot rely on verbal reports
34
culture and how we've studied / viewed its impact on our behaviour
used to think was just religious language etc now think it goes much deeper to the level of fundamental forms of self-conception and social interaction even to the perceptual and cognitive processes people use to develop new thoughts and behaviours
35
define independent (individualistic) cultures
a culture in which people tend to think of themselves as distinct social entities, tied to each other by voluntary bonds of affection and organizational memberships but essentially separate from other people and having attributes that exist in the absence of any connection to others
36
define interdependent (collectivistic) cultures
a culture in which people tend to define themselves as part of a collevtive, inextricably tied to others in their group placing less importance on the individual freedom or personal control over their lives
37
table comparing independent and interdependent cultures
inde -conception of self as distinct -insistence on abilty to act on ones own -need for individual distinctiveness -preference for achieved status based on accomplishments -conviction that rules governing behaviour should apply to everyone inter -conception of self as linked to others -preference for collective action -desire for harmonious relations within group -acceptance of hierarcy based on attributes (age etc) -preference for rules that take context and particular relationships into account
38
pen study on cultures
pen reward, all the same colour and one a different americans = chose the special one koreans = chose the normal / majority colour
39
culture shaping the human brain
chinese participants brain scanned then questionnaire of how inde vs inter they were more independent ratings = denser grey matter in ventrmedial prefrontal cortex
40
social class and inter vs inde
``` working class = more inter, middle class = more inde changes parenting styles car study, middle class would be sad to have lost uniqueness if friend bought the same car as them whereas working class would be happy to share some trait middle class found to prefer object they chose over one given (working class was vice versa) ```
41
define hindsight bias
peoples tendency to be overconfident about whether they could have predicted a given outcome
42
what is a thought experiment
think through the results you might get from a study
43
hypothesis
a prediction about what will happen under particular circumstances
44
define theory
a set of related propositions intended to describe some phenomenon or aspect of the world
45
what is dissonance theory
people dont like cognitive dissonance so will do alot of hard mental manipulation to get rid of it
46
participants observation
observing some phenomena at close range
47
archival research
researchers can look through archives | eg homocide more common in south than north
48
surveys
questionnaire people
49
representative sampling
people in the survey / sample must be representative of the population as a whole best achieved through selecting potential respondents randomly so in practice must know entire population then can randomly select from it
50
conveinience sampling
not random but based on an easiky available group may be biased in some ways eg literary digest predicting wrong election outcome as used telephone directories and automobile registrations = so just surveyed the wealthy
51
southern violenec study
southerners were more likely to favour violence in response to insults, threats to hoe and fmaily, defense honor culture?
52
define correlaitonal research
research that involved measuring two or more variables and assessing whether there is a relationship betwen them
53
define experimental research
in social psycholgy research thay randomly assigns people to different conditions or situations and that enables researchers to mke inferences about why a relationship exists or how different situations affect behaviour
54
define third variable
a variable, often unmeasured in correlational research that can be the true explanation for the relationship between two other variables
55
self-selection
in correlational research the situaion in which the participant rather than the researcher determines the participants level of each variable therby creating a problem that it could be these unknown other properties that are responsible for the observed relationship basically the stuff we cannot control for eg whether someone is married or not
56
define longitudinal study
a study conducted over a long period of time with the same participants
57
define iv
in experimental research the variable that is manipulated; it is hypothesized to be the cause of a particular outcome
58
define dv
in experimental research the variable that is measured (as opposed to manipulated); it is hypothesized to be affected by manipulation of the iv
59
define random assignment
assigning participants in experimental research randomly to different conditions so they are as likely to be assigned to one condition as to another, with the effect of making the types of people in the different conditions roughly equal
60
define control condition
a condition comparable to the experimental condition in every way except that it lacks one ingredient hypothesized to produce the expected effect on the dv
61
southerner angry study
north vs south conditions = gets insulted in corridor or not dv - obs, made to finish a story off, testosterone levels, then chicken with the lab technition who walked down the middle of the corridor
62
define natural experiments
a naturally occuring event or phenomenon habing somewhat different conditions that can be compared with almost as much rigour as in experiments where the investigator manipulates the conditions
63
define external validity
how well the results of a study generalize to contexts outside the conditions of the lab
64
why poor external validity wasn't too problematic in milgram
people never going to be placed in that situation | but Milgram's study highlighted why such things have happened (nazi etc) and how they will probably happen again
65
when is external validity not essential
when the purpose is to clarify a general idea or theory
66
define field experiment
an experiment conducted in the real world (not a lab), usually with participants who are not aware they are in a study of any kind
67
define internal validity
in experimental research, confidence that only the manipulated variable could have produced the results
68
how to maintain internal validity
random assignemnet third variables controlled for realistic experimental set up
69
define reliability
the degree to which the particular way researchers measure a given variable is likely to yield consistent results
70
measurement validity
the correlation between a measure and some outcome the measure is supposed to predict validity coefficients = the number
71
define replication
reproduction of research results by the original investigator or by someone else - sometimes wont replicate = results called into question - replication may not have been done right - sometimes just chance fail - replication may fail because was a fluke it worked the first time
72
5 threats to internal validity named
``` selection bias differential attribution regression to the mean experimenter / rater buas expectancy / hawthorn effects ```
73
define selection bias
assignment to conditions is not random but systematic | so diff people in diff conditions = the reason for differences and not what was manipulated
74
define differential attribution
if many more people drop out from one condition than another the people who stay in the more taxing or upsetting condition are likely to be different from those in the other condition, thus undermining random assignment
75
define regression to the mean
if people are in a study because they are exteme on the variable of interest, they are likely to become less extreme even though nothing is done therefore a treatment can seem effective even when it is of no value to combat this prblem the subjects in the treatment condition should be equally extreme (by random assignment)
76
experimenter / rater bias
if DV has an element of subjectivity and the rater knows the hypothesis or what condition the subject or object of judgement was in, the rater may make biased judgements the most common solution = make the rater blind
77
what are expectancy / hawthorn effects
participants can be biased by their expectations about the purpose of the experiment and act in away that confirms them the most common solution is to make the experiment double blind so neither the rater or the participants know what the study is designed to test and/or what condition the participant is in
78
some ways we are trying to solve the replication crisis
using larger sample sizes | insistence on reporting all stats and not just the one measure that popped out as significant
79
define open science
practices such as sharing data and research materials with anyone in the broader scientific community in an effort to increase the integrity and replicability of scientific research
80
institutional review board (IRB)
a committee that examines research proposals and makes judgements about the ethical appropriateness of the research - one scientisit - one non scientist - one person not affiliated with the university pre 2018 all federal funding used to need an IRB but now if only benign intervention ie interviews and surveys, abilities and personality tests, economic games, decision making and research on conformity to group norms not needed
81
define informed consent
a persons signed agreement to participate in a procedure or research study after learning all of its relevant aspects
82
define deception research
research in which the participants are misled about the purpose of the research or the menaing of something that is done to them
83
define debriefing
in preliminary versions of an experiment, asking particpants directly if they understood the instructions, found the setup to be reasonable and so on in later version debriefing is used to educate participants about the questions being studied
84
snap judgements
how we quickly make impressions of people face ratings were just as accurate when made snap and in a hurry than when given a long time to make the decision - our first impressions of people most research says they do well but we shouldn't put too much confidence in them as are just a kernel of truth
85
the 5 parts of social cognition
our judgements are only as accurate as the quality of information on which they are based (and the info available to us in everyday life is not always representative or complete) the way info is presented, including the order in which it is presented or how it is framed, can affect the judgements we make we don't just passively take in information, we actively seek it out and pervasive bias in how we do so can distort the conclusions we reach our preexisting knowledge and mental habits can influence how we construe new info and thus substantially influence judgement two mental systems : reason and intuition undelie social cognition and their complex interplay determines what judgements we make
86
define pluralistic ignorance
misperception of a group norma the results from observing people who are acting at variance with their private beliefs out of a concern for the social consequences; those actions reinforce the erroneous group norm eg gang members all think they act too brutally but won't be the one to admit it racial groups not wanting to make friends because both think the other one isn't interested
87
define self-fulfilling prophecy
the tendency for people to act in ways that bring about the very thing they expect to happen eg bloomers study note to be self fulfiling some mechanism must be at work to translate a persons expectation into action
88
self fulfilling prophect in interviewing suspects
students go to classroom either told to take $100 or just go there another group of students told who was guilty and who wasn't student interviewer was much more rigorous with the ones they thoughts were guilty which then made those accused more defensive and appear like they had committed the crime
89
bad news bias
media reports crime looks like 80% is violent when in fact it is only 20% no rise and fall of crime in the media - its always there = leads people to think crime has increase in the last 20 years when it has in fact decreased
90
watching tv and being a victim of crime belief study
correlationally watch more tv, higher belief will be a victim of crime further research people who live in dangerous areas and dont watch much tv fell safer than ther neighbours who watch alot
91
define primacy effects
a type of order effect: the disproportionate influence on judgement by information presented first in a body of evidence
92
define recency effect
a type of order effect: the disproportionate influence on judgement by information presented last in a body of evidence
93
an example of order effects in questionnaire
how happy are you how many dates have you been on in the last month correlation wayyyy higher when asked the other way round
94
when does primacy effect most often occur
when the information is ambiguous | so what comes first alters how the later bits of info are perceived
95
when do recency effects occur most often
when the last item comes more readily to mind
96
define framing effect
the influence on judgement resulting from the way information is presented, such as the order of presentation or the wording order effects are a type of framing effect
97
spin framing
varies the content, not just the order, of what is presented eg frame product in terms of quality or in terms of price frame in negative terms = more likely to dislike and be cautious
98
define construal level theory
a theory about the relationship between temporal distance (and other kinds of distance) and abstract or concrete thinking: psychologically distinct actions and events are thought about in terms of abstract terms; actions and events that are close at hand are thought about in concrete terms
99
temporal frame
we change our ideas based on the time | ie commit to early plans yesterday afternoon but now when push comes to shove don't want to get out of bed
100
define confirmation bias
the tendency to test a proposition by searching for evidence that would support it
101
define bottom-up processing
data driven mental processing in which an individual forms conclusions based on the stimuli encountered in the environment
102
define top-down processing
theory driven mental processing in which an individual filters and interprets new information in light of preexisting knowledge and expectations
103
attention is ...
selective
104
how schemas effect our judgements
directing our attention structuring our memories influencing our interpretations but can lead us to mischaracterise the world
105
gorilla study
basketball thrown around and count passes you miss th gorilla walking through the scene only half the participants noticed it
106
schemas and memory
memory - attention in past tense | schemas effec tour memory
107
donald experiment
participants thought was two separate studies words - of confidence of aloofness then rated donald based on same description of him those shown more favourable words rated him as more favourable
108
define priming
the presentation of information designed to activate a concept and hence make it accessible. a prime is the stimulus presented to activate the concept in question
109
define subliminal
below the threshold of conscious awareness
110
some quick studeis using priming and subliminal messages
subliminall present gamble or stay will influence people gambling playing german music increases sales of german wine activate goal achievement through showing dollar signs = people work harder on difficult stuff
111
types of schema activations
recent = like priming those words in donald study frequent activations and chronic accessibility = if you use a schema alot you rely on it and will use it more in the future
112
do you need to be conscious a schema is being activated to act on it
probably not | interviews post studies most people dont realise there was a link
113
expectations and schema application
sometimes people apply a schema because of a preexisting expectation about what they will encounter this expectation activates the schema
114
when does the intuitive system operate
quickly and automatically based on associations performs many operations simultaneously and in parallel
115
when does the rational system operate
slower and more controlled | based on rules and deductions and performs operations one at time - serially
116
amos tversky and daniel kahneman | - what did they work on
heuristics of judegments | big impact of their work
117
define heuristics
intuitive mental operations, performed quickly and automatically, that provide efficient answers to common problems of judgement
118
define availability heuristics
the processs whereby judgements of frequency ot probabliity are based on how readily pertinent instances come to mind
119
define representativeness heuristic
the process whereby judgements of likelihood are based on assessments of similarity between individuals and group prototypes or between cause and effect
120
argument tversky and kahneman made
the intuitive system automatically performs certain mental operations that powerfully influence judgement they yield answers that feel right and therefore often forestall more effortful, rational deliberation although these heuristics generally serve us well, they distort our judgements leads to a systematically biased system
121
where can availability heuristics be problematic
assessment of risk
122
define fluency
the feeling of ease (or difficulty) associated with processing information
123
how we assess group membership
we ask if the person look slike the prototype and not assess the likelihood they are a group member we use representativeness heuristics
124
define base-rate information
information about the relative frequency of events or of members of different categories in a population
125
study on tom by tversy and kahneman
descirption of tom gp 1 read and said how likley it was he studies each subject gp2 read and said how likely it was he worked now in each discipline last group didnt read about tom and just rated how many people they thought did each college degree = found likelihood of tom studying and toms similatiy ratings were very similar (gp 1and 2) - people followed a prototype approach but base rates came out totally different
126
define attribution theory
a set of concepts explaining how people assign cuase to the events aound them and the effects of these kinds of causal assessments
127
define causal attribution
linking an event to a cause, such as inferring that a personality trait is responsible for a behaviour used to explain both their own and others behaviour
128
define explanatory style
a persons habitual way of explaining events, typically assessed along 3 dimensions; internal/external, stable/unstable ad global/specific
129
what explanatory styles are correlated with poor life outcomes
explain negative events im terms of internal, stable and global causes
130
explanaotry style and health
link has been found longitudinal optimistic explanatory style during younger adulthood was a significant predictor of good physical health in later life
131
attribtuions about controllability and success
if view outcomes as in your control will persevere, if you think they are out of your controll, will give up we can train people to adopt certain mindsets (Dweck stuff)
132
define covariation principle
the idea that behaviour should be attributed to potential causes that occur along with observed behaviour
133
define consensus
a type of covariation information: whether most people would behave the same way or differently in a given situation
134
define distinctiveness
a type of covariation information: whether a behaviour is unique to a particular situation or occurs in many or all situations
135
define consistency
a type of covariation information: whether an individual behaves the same way or differently in a given situation on different occasions
136
when do we make situational attributions
when consistency, consensus and distinctiveness are all high
137
when are dispositional attributions called for
when consistency is high but consensus and distinctiveness are low
138
what do we tend to focus on
information about the person (distinctiveness and consistency) at the expense of information that speaks to influence of the surrounding context (consensus)
139
define self-serving attribution bias
the tendency to attribute failure and other bad events to exernal circumstances and other good events to ourself
140
define the fundamental attribution error
the failure to recognize the importance of situational influences on behaviour, along with the corresponding tendency to overemphasize the importance of dispositions on behaviour
141
define just world hypothesis
the belief that people get what they deserve in life and deserve what they get
142
salience in attributions
features of the environment that grab our attention more become more salient so are blamed more
143
define the actor-observer difference
a difference in attribution based on who is maing the causal assessment: the actor (who is relatively inclined to make situational attributions) or the observer (who is relatively inclined to make the dispositions)
144
several causes of the actor-observer difference
assumptions about what needs explaining perceptual salience information the actor and observer have