MOCK SQE FLK 1 Flashcards
FLK 1
What cost order would be made by the judge if both C’s and D’s Part 36 offer fails?
A normal costs order will be made if none of the offer’s trigger is satisfied. Unsuccessful party pays successful party’s costs.
Which court is appropriate to issue a claim with a value lower than £100.000 which requires extensive expert evidence?
County court
When can a part 36 offer be shown to the trial judge?
After the case is decided.
If a document is no longer in a party’s control, should it be disclosed?
Yes, but the party disclosing that doc can refuse inspection.
If a value of claim is lower than £25k but anticipated to take 2 days for trial, which track should the claim be allocated to?
Intermediate track due the length of trial.
What is a without prejudice privilege? Give an example.
Privilege for the purpose to attempt genuinely to settle the dispute. Often marked ‘without prejudice’.
ex: Part 36 offer.
When does the limitation period starts to run if a person is disabled for a personal injury claim?
A person under 18 years old is under a disability. The limitation period starts to run when the disability ends. The limitation for PI claims is 3 years starting to run on the date the cause of action is accrued.
What are the limitation periods to issue a claim?
- contract: 6 years from date of cause of action occurs (the date of the breach of contract)
- tort: 6 years from date of acknowledgement (when in a position to know) or cause of action
- Personal Injury: 3 years from latest of date of death/date of knowledge – time starts running from the day after the cause of action accrued
- Fatal Accidents: 3 years from latest of date of death/date of knowledge of dependant
- Neg (other than PI): latest of:
–> 6 years from date of cause of
action
–> 3 years from date of knowledge - Contribution: 2 years from time right to contribution arises.
What are the requirements to satisfy for liability under fraudulent trading
INSOLVENCY VOIDABLE TRANSACTIONS
Any person or director
who is knowingly party to carrying on of any business of the company; AND
with the intent to defraud creditors for any fraudulent purpose.
If both claim form and Statements of case are filed and served. Whose consent is required to add an additional defendant?
Only permission/consent needed is from the COURT
When should a request for further info° must be made?
If defence or any statement of case (PoC, defence etc) prevents the party from understanding clearly the statements.
Eg. defence is not understandable due to extensive abbreviations and technical language.
Which judge should be applied for permission to appeal when County Court Circuit Judge refuses permission to appeal?
High Court Judge
What are the steps to consider under American Cyanamid Guidelines to order an interim injunction?
- Is there a serious question to be tried?
o The applicant must show that the case is not frivolous or vexatious and that there is a genuine issue for the court to decide. If this condition isn’t met, the injunction will be refused. - Would damages be an adequate remedy?
o For the applicant: If damages would compensate the applicant sufficiently for the harm, an injunction may not be necessary.
o For the respondent: If the injunction is later found to have been wrongly granted, the court will consider whether the respondent can be compensated adequately by damages. - Where does the balance of convenience lie?
o If damages are not sufficient for either party, the court evaluates which party would suffer the greater injustice if the injunction is granted or denied.
What should you do if your client refuses to disclose a doc/evidence that is under the duty to disclose?
You should first advise your client to disclose the document.
If client continues to refuse, you should cease to act.
Did an actionable misrepresentation occur if the claimant does not see or hear the attempted misrepresentation?
Depends:
Misrepresentation can be made by conduct, if ONLY they are induced by it.
If the C did not see or hear the attempted misrepresentation, they are not induced by it and therefore, there would be no actionable misrepresentation.
Can an offer be accepted at any time to form a contract?
NO - an offer remains open until it is revoked or lapsed. If the offeror does not specify an expiry date for the offer, the offer will lapse after a reasonable time.
(eg. a sale of ring offer would lapse few months)
How do we establish an ‘agency’ relationship to circumvent the doctrine of privity of contract?
1- The principal named and it is clear that the agent is contracting on behalf of the principal.
2- The agent should be authorised to act as an agent (requisite authority to bind the principal)
3- consideration moved from the principal (ultimately the principal pays for the contract)
When is a contract formed?
When the offer is accepted by the offeree mirroring the terms of the offer.
When is the contract made when offeree accepts via email (or any instantaneous means)?
When the acceptance email is received.
NOT when it’s made.
When a revocation of an offer cannot be made for a contract?
When the contract has been accepted.
If a practical benefit is provided by the completion of a project on time but to do so the party made a demand for an additional sum threatening the innocent party that in case of non-payment of the extra money they would not complete their obligation under contract. Is the contractor asking for additional money entitled to that extra sum?
NO if made under duress.
IF the demand for extra money to correct miscalculation will not be viewed as a demand in good faith for the purposes of duress.
The party paying must protest this and must be under pressure of some sort (eg. must finish the project for clients at that specific time).
What is the remedy for a fraudulent misrepresentation?
Rescission of the contract.
Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when the party knowingly covers up or hides or conceals a fact/info.
What happens if there is an unilateral mistake between the contracting parties?
Contract is void. (if a reasonable person would think that there was no agreement)
difference between unilateral mistake and common mistake
if one of the parties knew and other didn’t albeit there is no fraudulent intention, it would amount to unilateral mistake.
If both parties are mistaken. It would be a common mistake.