Peikoff - Sense Perception And Volition - The Primary Choice As The Choice To Focus Or Not Flashcards
(35 cards)
Man, according to objectivism, is NOT moved by factors outside of his control.
He is …?
A VOLITIONAL BEING, WHO FUNCTIONS FREELY.
A course of thought or action is “free”, if …?
It is selected from 2 or more courses possible under the circumstances.
In such a case, the difference is made by the INDIVIDUAL’S DECISION, which did NOT HAVE TO BE WHAT IT IS, ie
==> WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN OTHERWISE.
To identify the exact locus of human freedom is a difficult task since it requires that one describe and distinguish complex states of consciousness.
Once this has been done, however, …?
The fact THAT man is free follows readily.
Overview of the Objectivist position.
Consciousness is an …?
ACTIVE PROCESS, not a motionless medium, such as a mirror, which passively reflects reality.
==> To achieve and maintain awareness, a man’s consciousness must perform a complex series of actions.
==> The OBJECT of awareness, REALITY, simply exists. It impinges on a man’s senses, but it does NOT do a man’s cognitive work for him NOR force itself on his mind.
==> THE MAN WHO WAITS FOR REALITY TO WRITE THE TRUTH INSIDE HIS SOUL WAITS IN VAIN.
The actions of consciousness required on the sensory-perceptual level are automatic.
On the CONCEPTUAL level, however, …?
They are NOT automatic.
THIS is the key to the locus of volition.
==> Man’s basic freedom of choice = to exercise his distinctively human cognitive machinery or not.
“TO THINK OR NOT TO THINK.”
As long as a man is awake (and his brain is intact), he is conscious of reality in the sensory-perceptual form.
THIS much is given to him by nature. But consciousness in the form required by his survival is …?
NOT given to man.
==> It must be achieved by a process of CHOICE.
==> Man’s choice is to be conscious (in the human sense) or not.
Volition subsumes different kinds of choices.
The PRIMARY CHOICE, the one that makes conceptual activity possible …?
Is the choice to FOCUS ONE’S CONSCIOUSNESS.
“Focus” (in the conceptual realm) names …?
A quality of purposeful alertness in a man’s mental state.
“Focus” is the state of a GOAL-DIRECTED MIND committed to attaining FULL AWARENESS OF REALITY.
“Full awareness” does NOT mean …?
Omniscience.
It means the awareness attainable by a man who seeks to understand some object by using to the full the evidence, the past knowledge, and the cognitive skills available to him at the time.
To “focus” one’s mind means to …?
Raise one’s degree of awareness.
It consists of shaking off mental lethargy and deciding to use one’s intelligence.
==> The state of being “in focus”-in FULL focus-means the decision to use one’s intelligence FULLY.
In situations where one’s knowledge is already adequate, full awareness does not require any new conceptualization.
It is attainable by a …?
Simple directing of attention.
In such cases, one is in focus if he does not relinquish control of his consciousness.
==> His mind remains self-aware and self-directed, and he is alert to the possibility that a process of cognition may be required at any time.
Focus is NOT …?
The same as thinking.
It need NOT involve problem-solving or the drawing of new conclusions.
Focus is the READINESS to think and as such the PRECONDITION OF THINKING.
(Use the visual analogy)
To change the visual analogy, the choice to focus, AR used to observe, is like …?
Throwing a switch. It may be compared to starting a car’s motor by turning on the ignition.
This throwing of the switch consists of the exertion of one’s mental capacity.
==> This exertion is WORK and is experienced as such-not pain, but WORK, IN THE SENSE OF BASIC MENTAL EFFORT.
==> It is the EFFORT required to reach and/or maintain full awareness.
“Effort” means …?
The expenditure of energy to achieve a purpose.
The exertion of such effort never becomes …?
Automatic.
==> The choice involved must be made anew in every situation and in regard to every subject a person deals with.
==> The decision to focus on one occasion does NOT determine other occasions.
==> It retains this capacity no matter how long a person has practiced the policy of seeking full awareness.
FOCUS NEVER TURNS INTO A MENTAL “REFLEX”. IT MUST BE WILLED CONTINUOUSLY.
==> This is INHERENT in calling it a MATTER OF CHOICE.
==> The essence of a VOLITIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS is the fact that its operation ALWAYS DEMANDS the same fundamental effort of initiation and then of maintenance across time.
The choice to focus is man’s primary choice. Primary here means:
PRESUPPOSED BY ALL OTHER CHOICES AND ITSELF IRREDUCIBLE.
Until a man is in focus, his mental machinery is unable to function in the human sense- …?
To think, to judge, to evaluate.
The choice to “throw the switch” is thus the ROOT CHOICE, on which all others depend.
Nor can a primary choice be …?
EXPLAINED BY ANYTHING MORE FUNDAMENTAL.
==> By its nature, it is a FIRST CAUSE within a consciousness, NOT AN EFFECT produced by antecedent factors.
==> It is NOT a product of parents or teachers, anatomy or conditioning, heredity or environment.
Nor can one explain the choice to focus by reference to a person’s own mental contents, such as his ideas:
The choice to activate the conceptual level of awareness MUST PRECEDE ANY IDEAS.
==> Until a person is conscious in a human sense, his mind cannot reach new conclusions or even apply previous ones to a current situation.
==> There can be NO INTELLECTUAL FACTOR which makes a man decide to become aware or which partly explains such a decision.
TO GRASP SUCH A FACTOR, HE MUST ALREADY BE AWARE.
For the same reason, there can be NO MOTIVE or VALUE-JUDGMENT which precedes consciousness:
The decision to perceive reality MUST PRECEDE VALUE-JUDGMENTS.
==> Otherwise, values have no source in one’s cognition of reality and thus become DELUSIONS.
Values do NOT lead to consciousness. Consciousness is what leads to values.
In short, it is invalid to ask: WHY did a man choose to focus?
There is no such “why”.
There is only the fact that a man CHOSE:
He chose the EFFORT OF CONSCIOUSNESS, or he chose non-effort and unconsciousness.
==> In THIS regard, every man at every waking moment is A PRIME MOVER.
This is not to deny that a person’s ideas can have effects, positive or negative, on his mental state:
If an individual accepts a philosophy of reason, and if he characteristically chooses to be in focus …
==> He will gradually gain knowledge, confidence, and a sense of INTELLECTUAL CONTROL.
This will make easier for him to be in focus. After he practices the policy for a time, focusing will come to seem natural, his thought processes will gain in speed and efficiency, he will enjoy using his mind, and he will experience little temptation to drop the mental reins.
On the other hand, if an individual accepts an anti-reason philosophy, and if he characteristically remains out of focus, he will …?
Increasingly feel BLIND, UNCERTAIN, and ANXIOUS.
This will make the choice to focus harder. After a while he will experience focus as an UNNATURAL STRAIN, his thought processes will become relatively tortured and unproductive, and he will be tempted more than ever to escape into a state of passive drift.
BOTH these patterns, however (and all the mixtures in between) are …?
SELF-MADE.
Human volition has produced each condition, and the opposite choices remain possible.
==> The first man still has to throw the switch the next time, which takes an expenditure of effort.
==> The second still has the capacity to focus as long as he is sane.
He has the capacity to gradually (and painfully) work his way out of his inner chaos and establish a better relationship to reality.