Personality Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

Define personality

A

Stable, enduring + unique traits of an individual that influences people to behave a certain way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why study personality in sport?

A

Good for coaches as all performers are diff. so important to understand how to motivate them.

Linked w/ choice of sport + success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the different trait theories

A

Eysenck’s theory - 1955

Cattell’s theory - 1965

Type A + B personalities theory

Biological theory- Sheldon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Criticisms of the trait theories

A

Behaviour can’t ALWAYS be predicted

Doesn’t take into account personality change

Personality + behaviour can change w/ the situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain Eysenck’s theory - 1955 (TRAIT)

A

Measured by the EPI (Eysenck’s Personality Inventory)

Extroversion + Introversion dimensions are initiated from a persons RAS (reticular activating system).

Stable/Neurotic dimensions are linked to a persons ANS (Autonomic Nervous System).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eysenck’s theory - 1955 (TRAIT)

Define extroverts vs introverts

A

Extroverts = Like social contact / affiliation

Introverts = Avoid social contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eysenck’s theory - 1955 (TRAIT)

Define stable vs unstable/neurotic

A

Stable = Reliable + predictable

Unstable/Neurotic = Extreme emotions + unreliable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eysenck’s theory - 1955 (TRAIT)

How does the ANS respond to stable + neurotic people?

A

Stable = ANS responds SLOWLY to stressful situations = even-tempered + easy going

Neurotic = ANS responds QUICKLY + STRONGLY to stressful situations = restless, anxious + excitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define the RAS (Reticular Activating System)

A

Part of the central cortex of the brain

Helps maintain optimum levels of arousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Eysenck’s theory - 1955 (TRAIT)

How does the RAS function in extroverts

A

RAS inhibits incoming info = under-arousal

So require additional stimulation to maintain optimum levels of brain activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Eysenck’s theory - 1955 (TRAIT)

How does the RAS function in introverts

A

RAS amplifies incoming info = over-arousal

Tended no to need external stimulation or excitement to function optimally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain Cattell’s theory - 1965 (TRAIT)

A

Used a self-report questionnaire

  • 16 personality factor questionnaire assesses overall personality.

Better than Eysenck’s theory due to accepting personality can change w. situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Type A + B Personalities (TRAIT)

Explain type A

A

Highly competitive

Achievement orientated

Eat, walk + talk fast

Aggressive, restless + impatient

High levels of stress

Diff. to not be in control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type A + B Personalities (TRAIT)

Explain type B

A

Less competitive

More relaxed

Calm, laid back + patient

Low levels of stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain biological theory - Sheldon (TRAIT)

A

Endomorphs = fun, sociable, relaxed

Mesomorphs = adventurous, competitive, extrovert

Ectomorphs = Self-conscious, introverted, intense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conclusion to the trait theories

A

Many traits contribute to our personality

Once we’ve assessed someone’s traits we can predict their behaviour

17
Q

Concerns w/ the trait theories

A

Fails to predict our behaviour

Failed to recognise that individuals are actively involved in constructing their own personality.

Failed to recognise the specific effects of diff. environmental situations.

18
Q

What are the problems with the socials learning theory - NURTURE

A

Doesn’t account for genetically inherited factors.

19
Q

Explain the interactionist approach (NATURE+NURTURE) of personality

A

Mixture of trait + social learning theories is more appropriate so a mixture of trait + environmental influence develop our personality.

Lewin approach to personality

B=f(PE)

Behaviour is a function of (Personality traits + the env.)

20
Q

What does Lewin’s approach to personality recognise w/in the interactionist approach?

A

That individuals in certain sports don’t all behave the same.

When situational factors are strong (i.e comp) they are more likely to affect behaviour than personality traits

When SF are weak (i.e training), personality traits are more likely to affect behaviour.

21
Q

What did Hollander believe about personality?

A

Personality was a layered structure:

  1. Psychological core = Fairly permanent, values, what you believe
  2. Typical Responses = to a situation
  3. Role-related behaviours = changeable, dependent on situation, could be diff. to core.
22
Q

What are the different ways to measure personality?

A

Self-report Questionnaires

Psychometric Tests

Personality profiling

Observation

Interview

23
Q

What are the 2 types of Personality profiling under measuring personality?

A

Eysenck’s Personality inventory (EPI) = Yes or No answers

Cattell’s 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) = 141 statements + subject is given a score out of 10

24
Q

Define validity in measuring personality

A

Does the personality test measure the performer’s whole personality?

25
Define reliability in measuring personality
If the tests are repeated will the same results be gained?
26
What are the adv. to questionnaires
Quick Cheap Objective Efficient so large numbers can be assessed quickly. Coach can then compare and use results
27
What are the disadv. to questionnaires
Players may not understand questions so may say socially desirable answers Answers depend on mood state (win or loss) Results influenced by time – may rush to complete and give wrong answer Answers too vague (yes/no)
28
What are the adv to observation
Personality tested in the actual setting
29
What are the disadv to observation
⬇️ validity + reliability Subjects know they are being watched so change behaviour Based on opinion of observer (subjective) Time consuming = would need to know about the performer before watching so can compare behaviour to the norm Training required
30
Give adv to interviews to measure personality
Gain an in-depth understanding of the person Face to face, can read body language, can ask for further reasoning, open questions, qualitative
31
Give disadv to interviews to measure personality
⬇️ validity + reliability Time consuming Responses can change according to mood Person interviewing the subject may cause them to be nervous which will affect responses to questions
32
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Morgan 1979 Those w/ a good mental health will produce the Iceberg profile implying that success in sport may enhance +ive mental health. That +ive mental health doesn't lead to sporting success. Found that successful athletes were above the norm for vigour but below the line for tension, depression, anger...
33
What are the 6 moods in the Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Tension Depression Anger Vigour Fatigue Confusion
34
What research was found by Butt
That those involved in team sports are more extroverted than those involved in ind. sports. Explanation = Reticular Activating System is strong in introverts + weak in extroverts.
35
According to Morgan what 2 groups have emerged based on views into personality in sport
The credulous view Sceptical view
36
Define the credulous view
Sports psychologists who believe personality test are accurate predictors of success + that there's a link between personality, participation + performance in sport.
37
Define the sceptical view
Sports psychologists who believe personality tests were of little value in predicting athlete success.